Who combines shared e-scooters and public transportation? Insights from Stockholm, Gothenburg, and Malmö, Sweden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2026.26.3.8350Keywords:
micromobility, e-scooters, first- and last-mile, multimodal travel, shared mobilityAbstract
Shared e-scooters have promising potential to solve the problem of first- and last-mile with public transportation. However, it remains unclear how often these modes are combined in practice and which users are most likely to make multimodal trips. We address this research gap by surveying 1269 shared e-scooter users in Stockholm, Gothenburg, and Malmö, Sweden. A binary logistic regression model is estimated to determine the characteristics of users who have made at least one combined trip in the last six months. In addition, an ordinal logistic regression model is estimated to understand the factors that determine whether users exhibit frequent multimodal usage. Similar to other studies, the typical shared e-scooter user in Sweden is a younger, highly educated, well-paid urban man who lives in the city center. Our results suggest, however, that multimodal users could be a contrasting subgroup. In Stockholm, frequent users had higher odds of making a combined trip. However, frequent e-scooter usage did not necessarily lead to more frequent multimodal travel. Users with lower incomes or those living outside the city center had higher odds of combined trips. Users living outside the central operational zone in Stockholm were more than three times as likely to have made a combined trip, while in Gothenburg, such users were more than five times as likely to do so. In contrast, Malmö’s multimodal users aligned more with the typical shared e-scooter profile: users who had combined the modes were under the age of 30, had higher incomes, or were more frequent users. These findings have important policy implications for authorities aiming for better and more equitable multimodal integration of e-scooters and public transportation.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aarhaug, J., Fearnley, N., & Johnsson, E. (2023). E-scooters and public transport – Complement or competition?. Research in Transportation Economics, 98, Article 101279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101279
Askari, S., Merikhipour, M., Rahimi, E., Peiravian, F., & Mohammadian, A. (2025). Uncovering individual-level determinants of shared e-scooting travel frequency. Multimodal Transportation, 4(4), Article 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2025.100228
Baek, K., Lee, H., Chung, J.-H., & Kim, J. (2020). Electric scooter sharing: How do people value it as a last-mile transportation mode?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102642
Berg Wincent, B., Jenelius, E., & Burghout, W. (2025). Shared e-scooter parking regulation: Effects on rider attitudes, perceptions, and use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 199, Article 104527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104527
Christoforou, Z., de Bortoli, A., Gioldasis, C., & Seidowsky, R. (2021). Who is using e-scooters and how? Evidence from Paris. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, Article 102708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102708
Currie, G., Delbosc, A., Cox, R., Jayawardhena, M., & Reynolds, J. (2025). Exploring shared e-scooter trip patterns and links to public transport service level. Multimodal Transportation, 4(2), Article 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2025.100205
Fearnley, N., Johnsson, E., & Berge, S. H. (2020). Patterns of e-scooter use in combination with public transport. Transport Findings. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.13707
Guo, Z., Liu, J., Zhao, P., Li, A., & Liu, X. (2023). Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the shared e-scooter–public transport relationships in Stockholm and Helsinki. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 122, Article 103880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103880
Hu, L., Liao, Y., Gao, K., Jin, S., & Precup, R.-E. (2025). Integration of e-scooter sharing with public transit on employment accessibility and equity. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 140, Article 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104604
Huang, E., Yin, Z., Broaddus, A., & Yan, X. (2023). Shared e-scooters as a last-mile transit solution? Travel behavior insights from Los Angeles and Washington D.C. Travel Behaviour and Society, 34, Article 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100663
Javadinasr, M., Asgharpour, S., & Mohammadian, A. (2025). E-scooters as transit feeders: Insights from revealed preferences of shared e-scooter users. Transportation Letters, 17(10), 1801–1818. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2025.2496455
Javadinasr, M., Davatgari, A., Rahimi, E., Mohammadi, M., Mohammadian, A., & Auld, J. (2023). Coupling shared E-scooters and public transit: A spatial and temporal analysis. Transportation Letters, 16(6), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2023.2227447
Laa, B., & Leth, U. (2020). Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: Who they are and how they ride. Journal of Transport Geography, 89, Article 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102874
Li, A., Gao, K., Zhao, P., & Axhausen, K. W. (2024). Integrating shared e-scooters as the feeder to public transit: A comparative analysis of 124 European cities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 160, Article 104496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2024.104496
Luo, H., Zhang, Z., Gkritza, K., & Cai, H. (2021). Are shared electric scooters competing with buses? A case study in Indianapolis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 97, 102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102877
McQueen, M., & Clifton, K. J. (2022). Assessing the perception of E-scooters as a practical and equitable first-mile/last-mile solution. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 165, 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.021
Psarrou Kalakoni, A. M., Christoforou, Z., & Gioldasis, C. (2024). The ambivalent relationship of e-scooters and public transport: Evidence from France. Transport Policy, 159, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.10.023s
Reck, D. J., & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Who uses shared micro-mobility services? Empirical evidence from Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, Article 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102803
Reck, D. J., Martin, H., & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Mode choice, substitution patterns and environmental impacts of shared and personal micro-mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102, Article 103134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103134
Sarker, M. A. A., Asgari, H., Chowdhury, A. Z., & Jin, X. (2024). Exploring micromobility choice behavior across different mode users using machine learning methods. Multimodal Transportation, 3(4), Article 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2024.100167
Statistics Sweden. (2025). Statistical database (income statistics and educational attainment by region, 2022). Retrieved April 3, 2025. https://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/en/ssd/
Tyndall, J. (2022). Complementarity of dockless micromobility and rail transit. Journal of Transport Geography, 103, Article 103411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103411
Vinagre Díaz, J. J., Fernández Pozo, R., Rodríguez González, A. B., Wilby, M. R., & Anvari, B. (2023). Blind classification of e-scooter trips according to their relationship with public transport. Transportation, 51(5), 1679–1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-023-10382-4
Wang, K., Qian, X., Fitch, D. T., Lee, Y., Malik, J., & Circella, G. (2022). What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings. Transport Reviews, 43(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2015639
Weschke, J. (2023). Scooting when the metro arrives—Estimating the impact of public transport stations on shared e-scooter demand. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 178, Article 103868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103868
Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., & Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, Article 103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468
Yan, X., Zhao, X., Broaddus, A., Johnson, J., & Srinivasan, S. (2023). Evaluating shared e-scooters’ potential to enhance public transit and reduce driving. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 117, 103640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103640
Yin, Z., Rybarczyk, G., Zheng, A., Su, L., Sun, B., & Yan, X. (2023). Shared micromobility as a first- and last-mile transit solution? Spatiotemporal insights from a novel dataset. Journal of Transport Geography, 114, Article 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103778
Ziedan, A., Darling, W., Brakewood, C., Erhardt, G., & Watkins, K. (2021). The impacts of shared e-scooters on bus ridership. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 153, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.08.019
Ziedan, A., Shah, N. R., Wen, Y., Brakewood, C., Cherry, C. R., & Cole, J. (2021). Complement or compete? The effects of shared electric scooters on bus ridership. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 101, 103098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103098
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Boel Berg Wincent, Erik Jenelius, Wilco Burghout

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

