Digital platforms for mobility services: Analyzing the current market landscape and European regulatory efforts

David Ennen; Benjamin Frieske; Marc Hasselwander; Shravana Kumar; Klaus Lütjens; Sven Maertens; Janina Scheelhaase; Benedikt Scheier

doi:10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.4.7834

Digital platforms for mobility services: Analyzing the current market landscape and European regulatory efforts

Authors

David Ennen Institute of Air Transport, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany; Benjamin Frieske Institute of Vehicle Concepts, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Stuttgart, Germany; Marc Hasselwander Institute of Transport Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany; Shravana Kumar Institute of Air Transport, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany; Klaus Lütjens Institute of Air Transport, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Hamburg, Germany; Sven Maertens Institute of Air Transport, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany | Emirates Aviation University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Janina Scheelhaase Institute of Air Transport, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany; Benedikt Scheier Institute of Transportation Systems, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Braunschweig, Germany;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.4.7834

Keywords:

Multimodal mobility, Platform economics, Mobile apps, EU regulation, SWOT analysis

Abstract

This paper analyses multimodal mobility platforms which enable the matching of supply and demand for transportation services, including new forms such as ride-hailing, ride-pooling, or vehicle sharing. Typically, such platforms appear as mobile applications (apps), sometimes evolving into “super apps” that even include non-transport services. This paper aims at answering the following research questions: (1) Which digital mobility platforms dominate the global market and how can they be characterized?; (2) What economic impacts can be expected for mobility companies from a possible EU regulation to facilitate platform-based bookings and multimodal travel (e.g., the EU Multimodal Digital Mobility Services (MDMS) initiative)?; and (3) Which overarching recommendations can be derived for policymakers concerning such a possible regulation? To investigate these questions, we first identify and characterize the most important mobility platforms based on data from an analytics firm for the mobile app market. The characteristics considered include platform usage, the number of integrated mobility services, and the countries in which they are operated. We then analyse statements from stakeholders collected during a public consultation on the EU MDMS initiative to identify significant SWOTs (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) for individual stakeholder groups in connection with such a possible future EU regulation. Based on this, we derive regulatory recommendations for policymakers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bakos, Y. (1998). The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1145/280324.280330

Becker, H., Balac, M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2020). Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.027

Bedre-Defolie, Ö., & Nitsche, R. (2020). When do markets tip? An overview and some insights for policy. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 11(10), 610-622. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpaa084

Brousseau, E., & Pénard, T. (2007). The economics of digital business models: A framework for analyzing the economics of platforms. Review of Network Economics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1112

Bryan, K. A., & Gans, J. S. (2019). A theory of multihoming in rideshare competition. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 28(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12306

Butler, L., Yigitcanlar, T., & Paz, A. (2021). Barriers and risks of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) adoption in cities: A systematic review of the literature. Cities, 109, Article 103036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103036

Cruz, C. O., & Sarmento, J. M. (2020). “Mobility as a service” platforms: A critical path towards increasing the sustainability of transportation systems. Sustainability, 12(16), Article 6368. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166368

Da Silveira, G., Borenstein, D., & Fogliatto, F.S. (2001). Mass customization: Literature review and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 72(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00079-7

Data.ai (2024). Top Apps. Retrieved May 27, 2024, from https://www.data.ai/intelligence/top-apps/usage

de Ruijter, A., Cats, O., & van Lint, H. (2022). Emerging dynamics in ridesourcing markets. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4258151

European Commission (2011). Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system [White paper]. COM(2011) 144 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0144:FIN:en:PDF

European Commission (n.d.). Multimodal digital mobility services – About this initiative. Retrieved March 14, 2024, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13133-Multimodal-digital-mobility-services_en

Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press.

Gerwe, O., & Silva, R. (2020). Clarifying the sharing economy: Conceptualization, typology, antecedents, and effects. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0010

Guyader, H., & Piscicelli, L. (2019). Business model diversification in the sharing economy: The case of GoMore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.114

Hasselwander, M. (2024a). Digital platforms’ growth strategies and the rise of super apps. Heliyon, 10(5), Article e25856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25856

Hasselwander, M. (2024b). Mobility-as-a-Feature (MaaF): Why and how ride-sharing platforms have evolved into super apps. Transportation Research Procedia, 78, 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2024.02.038

Hasselwander, M., & Bigotte, J. F. (2023). Mobility as a service (MaaS) in the Global South: Research findings, gaps, and directions. European Transport Research Review, 15, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00604-2

Hasselwander, M., Bigotte, J. F., & Fonseca, M. (2022). Understanding platform internationalisation to predict the diffusion of new mobility services. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, Article 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100765

Hensher, D. A., & Hietanen, S. (2023). Mobility as a feature (MaaF): Rethinking the focus of the second generation of mobility as a service (MaaS). Transport Reviews, 43(3), 325-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2159122

Jiang, F., Zheng, X., Fan, D., Zhang, P., & Li, S. (2021). The sharing economy and business model design: A configurational approach. Journal of Management Studies, 58(4), 949-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12711

Lime (2023, February 21). Lime becomes the first shared electric vehicle company to achieve a full profitable year. Retrieved May 15, 2024, from https://www.li.me/blog/lime-becomes-the-first-shared-electric-vehicle-company-to-achieve-a-full-profitable-year

Lyons, G., Hammond, P., & Mackay, K. (2019). The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 121, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.010

Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Basics and techniques] (12th ed.). Beltz Verlag.

Mitropoulos, L., Kortsari, A., & Ayfantopoulou, G. (2021). A systematic literature review of ride-sharing platforms, user factors and barriers. European Transport Research Review, 13, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00522-1

Montero, J. J. (2019). Regulating transport platforms: The case of carpooling in Europe. In M. Finger, M. Audouin (Eds.) The governance of smart transportation systems: Towards new organizational structures for the development of shared, automated, electric and integrated mobility (pp. 13-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96526-0_2

Murati, E. (2023). MaaS differentiated treatment conducts under the EU competition law and beyond. In Regulating mobility as a service (MaaS) in European Union: A legal analysis of digitalization, competition, and multimodality (pp. 275-323). Springer. https ://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46731-8_9

Narayanan, S., & Antoniou, C. (2023). Shared mobility services towards mobility as a service (MaaS): What, who and when?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 168, Article 103581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103581

Nourinejad, M., & Ramezani, M. (2019). Ride-sourcing modelling and pricing in non-equilibrium two-sided markets. Transportation Research Procedia, 38, 833-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.05.043

Padilla, J., Perkins, J., & Piccolo, S. (2022). Self‐preferencing in markets with vertically integrated gatekeeper platforms. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 70(2), 371-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12287

Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212

Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: a progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x

Scheier, B., Frieske, B., & Viergutz, K. (2021). Chancen und potenziale von Mobility-as-a-Service nach der corona-pandemie [Opportunities and potential of Mobility-as-a-Service after the coronavirus pandemic]. Wirtschaftsdienst, 101(5), 394-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2924-3

Shaheen, S., & Chan, N. (2016). Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first- and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environment, 42(4), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.42.4.573

Stopka, U., Pessier, R., & Günther, C. (2018). Mobility as a service (MaaS) based on intermodal electronic platforms in public transport. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 10902. Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction in Context (pp. 419 – 439). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91244-8_34

Täuscher, K., & Laudien, S. M. (2018). Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal, 36(3), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005

Thelen K. (2018) Regulating Uber: The politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 938-953. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001081

Tirachini, A. (2020). Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review. Transportation, 47(4), 2011–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10070-2

Uber (2023). Uber 2022 annual report. Uber Investor. https://s23.q4cdn.com/407969754/files/doc_financials/2023/ar/2022-annual-report.pdf

van den Berg, V. A. C., Meurs, H., & Verhoef, E. T. (2022). Business models for mobility as an service (MaaS). Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 157, 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2022.02.004

VNV Global (2023). Annual report 2022. VNV Global. https://vnv.global/netcat_files/12/13/vnv_ar_2022_eng.pdf

Weiss, D., & Hasselwander, M. (2024). Super apps and the mobility transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 55, Article 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100955