Modelling and Analysis of Autonomous Airport Surface Movement Operations based on Multi-Agent Planning

Explorative Case Study at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol

Authors

  • Malte von der Burg Delft University of Technology
  • Alexei Sharpanskykh Delft University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.1.7459

Keywords:

multi-agent system, multi-agent motion planning, autonomous airport operations, airport surface movement operations, automation, air traffic control

Abstract

Both EASA and SESAR JU define a vision and roadmap towards an autonomous air traffic management system. Furthermore, past and ongoing SESAR JU projects investigate how to increase the efficiency and predictability of current operations by means of automation. In this paper, we explore the operational implications that result from fully-automated airport surface movement operations modelled with high realism. A hierarchical multi-agent system model was developed to coordinate and control all movements on the airport surface. It comprises the Airport Operations Agent to handle the flight schedule and runway configuration, the Routing Agent to compute conflict-free trajectories, and the Guidance Agents to instruct and monitor the Aircraft Agents while these execute the planned routes. The model incorporates the decisive processes and elements of airport surface movement operations such as pushback, engine-start, inbound and outbound holding, compliance to CTOT-slots, and wake turbulence separation for takeoffs. To compute conflict-free trajectories for all taxiing agents, we tailored and extended state-of-the-art multi-agent motion planning algorithms: the two-level routing algorithm combines Priority-Based Search (PBS) with Safe Interval Path Planning (SIPP). We defined different sizes of aircraft, accounted for a minimal safety distance between them, and calibrated their speed limits in curves with historic ADS-B data. Using the real-world flight schedules of two of the busiest days at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, including different runway configurations, we examine the performance of the autonomous taxiing system with respect to the historic operations. For the considered simulation conditions, we show that the MAS yields 30% lower taxi times that vary less and are more predictable, and increases runway capacity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

AEON - Advanced Engine-Off Taxiing Operations. (2021). AEON. Retrieved September 25, 2023, from https://www.aeon-project.eu/

AI roadmap 2.0: Human-centric approach to AI in aviation. (2023, May). EASA.

Atkin, J. A. D., Burke, E. K., & Ravizza, S. (2010). The Airport Ground Movement Problem: Past and Current Research and Future Directions. In 4th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation.

Automation in air traffic management: Long-term vision and initial research roadmap. (2020). SESAR JU.

Bae, I., Moon, J., Jhung, J., Suk, H., Kim, T., Park, H., Cha, J., Kim, J., Kim, D., & Kim, S. (2022, November 18). Self-Driving like a Human driver instead of a Robocar: Personalized comfortable driving experience for autonomous vehicles. arXiv: 2001.03908 [cs, eess]. Retrieved March 8, 2024, from http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.03908

Bakowski, D. L., Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C., & Wolter, C. A. (2015). NextGen Surface Trajectory-Based Operations (STBO): Evaluating Conformance to a Four-dimensional Trajectory (4DT). Procedia Manufacturing, 3.

Chen, J., Weiszer, M., Stewart, P., & Shabani, M. (2015). Toward a More Realistic, Cost-Effective, and Greener Ground Movement Through Active Routing—Part I: Optimal Speed Profile Generation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17.

Chua, Z., Cousy, M., Causse, M., & Lancelot, F. (2017). Initial assessment of the impact of modern taxiing techniques on airport ground control. Proceedings of HCI-Aero 2016.

Cohen, L., Uras, T., Kumar, T. K. S., & Koenig, S. (2019). Optimal and bounded-suboptimal multi-agent motion planning. Proceedings of SoCS-19.

De Winkel, K. N., Irmak, T., Happee, R., & Shyrokau, B. (2023). Standards for passenger comfort in automated vehicles: Acceleration and jerk. Applied Ergonomics, 106.

Eurocontrol. (2018). European aviation in 2040 - challenges of growth. Eurocontrol StatisticsForecast Service.

Eurocontrol. (2021, November 30). Data snapshot #22 on lower summer taxi-out times.

Helbing, D., & Balietti, S. (2015). How to do agent-based simulations in the future: From modeling social mechanisms to emergent phenomena and interactive systems design.

IATA. (2021, October 4). Net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Press Release No. 66. Retrieved April 4, 2023, from https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/pressroom-archive/2021-releases/2021-10-04-03/

ICAO. (2004). Advanced Surface Guidance and Control Systems (A-SMGCS) Manual.

ICAO. (2016). Aerodrome design and operations. In Annex 14 to the convention on international civil aviation (7th ed.).

Lane, R., Dubuisson, S., Ellejmi, M., & Cerasi, E. (2020, April 22). EUROCONTROL specification for A-SMGCS services.

Li, J., Tinka, A., Kiesel, S., Durham, J. W., Kumar, T. K. S., & Koenig, S. (2021). Lifelong multi-agent path finding in large-scale warehouses. Proceedings of AAAI-21.

Liu, Y., Hansen, M., Gupta, G., Malik, W., & Jung, Y. (2014). Predictability impacts of airport surface automation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 44.

Ma, H., Harabor, D., Stuckey, P. J., Li, J., & Koenig, S. (2019). Searching with consistent prioritization for multi-agent path finding. Proceedings of AAAI-19.

Morris, R., Pasareanu, C. S., Luckow, K., Malik, W., Ma, H., Kumar, T. K. S., & Koenig, S. (2016). Planning, Scheduling and Monitoring for Airport Surface Operations. In AAAI-16 Workshop on Planning for Hybrid Systems.

NielsB. (2007, August 6). Schiphol (Amsterdam Airport) overview map. Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved September 28, 2023, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schiphol-overview.png Phillips, M., & Likhachev, M. (2011). SIPP: Safe Interval Path Planning for dynamic environments. Proceedings of ICRA-11.

Roling, P. C., & Visser, H. G. (2008). Optimal Airport Surface Traffic Planning Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2008.

Rooseleer, F., & Treve, V. (2018, February 14). RECAT-EU: European wake turbulence categorisation and separation minima on approach and departure.

Sargent, R. G. (2011). Verification and validation of simulation models. Proceedings of WSC-10. Schiphol - standaard pushback per positie. (n.d.). Schiphol. Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.schiphol.nl/en/operations/page/sleep-en-pushbackbewegingen/

SESAR Joint Undertaking | ASTAIR - Auto-Steer Taxi at Airport. (2023). Retrieved September 25, 2023, from https://www.sesarju.eu/projects/astair

SESAR Joint Undertaking | MOTO - the Embodied Remote Tower. (2016). Retrieved September 25, 2023, from https://www.sesarju.eu/projects/moto

SESAR Joint Undertaking | TaCo - Take Control. (2017). Retrieved September 25, 2023, from https ://www.sesarju.eu/projects/taco

Stergianos, C., Atkin, J., Schittekat, P., Nordlander, T., Gerada, C., & Morvan, H. (2016). The importance of considering pushback time and arrivals when routing departures on the ground at airports. Proceedings of ICAOR-16.

Stern, R., & Sturtevant, N. R. (2019). Multi-agent pathfinding: Definitions, variants, and benchmarks. Proceedings of SoCS-19.

Udluft, H. (2017). Decentralization in Air Transportation [Doctoral dissertation, Department of Control and Operations, Aerospace Engineering, TU Delft].

von der Burg, M., & Sharpanskykh, A. (2023). Multi-Agent Planning for Autonomous Airport Surface Movement Operations. SESAR Innovation Days 2023.

Weiszer, M., Burke, E. K., & Chen, J. (2020). Multi-objective routing and scheduling for airport ground movement. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 119.

X-Plane. (2024). WorldEditor (WED) (Version WED 2.5).

Zhang, M., Huang, Liu, & Li. (2019). Multi-Objective Optimization of Aircraft Taxiing on the Airport Surface with Consideration to Taxiing Conflicts and the Airport Environment. Sustainability, 11.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-09

How to Cite

von der Burg, M., & Sharpanskykh, A. (2025). Modelling and Analysis of Autonomous Airport Surface Movement Operations based on Multi-Agent Planning: Explorative Case Study at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 25(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.1.7459

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.