Impact of stakeholder cooperation for centralized route guidance and full automated vehicle compliance

Simeon Calvert; Bas van den Burg; Henk Taale

doi:10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.2.7194

Impact of stakeholder cooperation for centralized route guidance and full automated vehicle compliance

Authors

Simeon Calvert Department of Transport & Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1173-0071
Bas van den Burg Civil Engineering, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Henk Taale Department of Transport & Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7366-1075

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.2.7194

Keywords:

Route guidance, Traffic policy strategies, Service provider cooperation, Automated vehicle routing

Abstract

Route guidance in traffic management aims to improve traffic network performance aligned with a system optimum. However, service providers commonly offer user optimal travel advice that can negatively impact centralized route guidance. This paper quantifies and demonstrates the impact of different policy strategies for a centralized route guidance systems where road authorities and service providers work together in a coordinated approach. Cooperation through an intermediary is considered with various policy strategies that consider different approaches and levels of cooperation between road authorities and service providers, which are evaluated using traffic modelling. A use case for the ring network of Milan shows that cooperation between the two parties has the potential to get the best out of the measure by utilizing a system optimum approach, while still allowing service providers to offer individual travel advice. The results of the modelled case study clearly show that the two approaches of far-reaching cooperation and increased compliance have a greater positive effect on traffic network performance in terms of reduced delays, reduced congestion and total time spent. In addition, the future presence of Connected Automated Vehicles (CAV) is also considered in which these vehicle demonstrate full compliance. This shows that with increasing percentage of CAVs that route guidance can have a substantial positive effect compared to low compliance or a smaller penetration rate of automated vehicles.

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views

67

|

References

Abdelghany, K. F., Mahmassani, H. S., & Abdelghany, A. F. (2007). A modeling framework for bus rapid transit operations evaluation and service planning. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(6), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060701835812

Antoniou, C., Koutsopoulos, H. N., Ben-Akiva, M., & Chauhan, A. S. (2011). Evaluation of diversion strategies using dynamic traffic assignment. Transportation Planning and Technology, 34(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2011.562378

Armstrong, M., & Sappington, D. E. (2006). Regulation, competition and liberalization. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(2), 325–366. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.44.2.325

Backfrieder, C., Ostermayer, G., & Mecklenbräuker, C. F. (2016). Increased traffic flow through node-based bottleneck prediction and V2X communication. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(2), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2599133

Bagloee, S. A., Tavana, M., Asadi, M., & Oliver, T. (2016). Autonomous vehicles: Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies. Journal of Modern Transportation, 24(4), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3

Bilali, A., Isaac, G., Amini, S., & Motamedidehkordi, N. (2019). Analyzing the impact of anticipatory vehicle routing on the network performance. Transportation Research Procedia, 41, 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.083

Bliemer, M. C., Raadsen, M. P., Brederode, L. J., Bell, M. G. H., Wismans, L. J., & Smith, M. J. (2017). Genetics of traffic assignment models for strategic transport planning. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1207789

Bliemer, M., Raadsen, M., De Romph, E., & Smits, E.-S. (2013). Requirements for traffic assignment models for strategic transport planning: A critical assessment. In Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum. Brisbane, Australia.

Bonsall, P. W., & Joint, M. (1991). Driver compliance with route guidance advice: The evidence and its implications. In Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 47–59). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VNIS.1991.205616

Boyce, D., & Xiong, Q. (2004). User-optimal and system-optimal route choices for a large road network. Review of Network Economics, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1054

Brederode, L., Gerards, L., Wismans, L., Pel, A., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2023). Extension of a static into a semi-dynamic traffic assignment model with strict capacity constraints. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2023.2249118

Brunekreeft, G. (2015). Network unbundling and flawed coordination: Experience from the electricity sector. Utilities Policy, 34, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2015.03.001

Burghout, W., Koutsopoulos, H. N., & Andreasson, I. (2010). Incident management and traffic information: Tools and methods for simulation-based traffic prediction. Transportation Research Record, 2161(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/2161-03

Calvert, S. C., Snelder, M., Bakri, T., Heijligers, B., & Knoop, V. L. (2015). Real-time travel time prediction framework for departure time and route advice. In Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting.

Cascetta, E., Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F., & Vitetta, A. (1996). A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: Specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (pp. 697–711). Lyon, France.

Chen, H., Wu, F., Hou, K., & Qiu, T. Z. (2022). Backpressure-based distributed dynamic route control for connected and automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3171734

De Souza, A. M., Brennand, C. A., Yokoyama, R. S., Donato, E. A., Madeira, E. R., & Villas, L. A. (2017). Traffic management systems: A classification, review, challenges, and future perspectives. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(4), 1550147716683612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147716683612

El Hamdani, S., & Benamar, N. (2018). Autonomous traffic management: Open issues and new directions. In 2018 International Conference on Selected Topics in Mobile and Wireless Networking (MoWNeT) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MoWNeT.2018.8428984

Emmerink, R. H., Axhausen, K. W., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1995). Effects of information in road transport networks with recurrent congestion. Transportation, 22, 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098982

Gan, H., & Chen, S. (2013). Why do drivers change routes? Impact of graphical route information panels. ITE Journal, 83(8), 38.

Groenendijk, J., de Kievit, M., van Min, E., & van Oosten, M. (2021). SOCRATES2.0 Final Evaluation. SOCRATES2.0 Project.

Hegyi, A., De Schutter, B., Hoogendoorn, S., Babuska, R., van Zuylen, H., & Schuurman, H. (2001). A fuzzy decision support system for traffic control centers. In 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No. 01TH8585) (pp. 358–363). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2001.948556

Hoogendoorn, S., Schuurman, H., & De Schutter, B. (2003). Real-time traffic management scenario evaluation. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 36(14), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)33394-2

Houshmand, A., Wollenstein-Betech, S., & Cassandras, C. G. (2019). The penetration rate effect of connected and automated vehicles in mixed traffic routing. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) (pp. 1755–1760). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917394

Huisken, G., Pepikj, M., Yperman, I., Feitsma, A., Rodrigues, N., & Vlemmings, T. (2020). Optimising network traffic flow with cooperative traffic management in the Amsterdam region.

Huisken, G., Rodrigues, N., & Vlemmings, T. (2019). Cooperation models for public-private partnerships in traffic management. In Proceedings of the 14th European Congress on ITS, Eindhoven. ERTICO – ITS Europe.

Iraganaboina, N. C., Bhowmik, T., Yasmin, S., Eluru, N., & Abdel-Aty, M. A. (2021). Evaluating the influence of information provision (when and how) on route choice preferences of road users in Greater Orlando: Application of a regret minimization approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 122, 102923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102923

Jaag, C., & Trinkner, U. (2011). A general framework for regulation and liberalization in network industries. In International Handbook of Network Industries (pp. 14–33). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Kammoun, H. M., Kallel, I., Casillas, J., Abraham, A., & Alimi, A. M. (2014). Adapt-Traf: An adaptive multiagent road traffic management system based on hybrid ant-hierarchical fuzzy model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 42, 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.003

KiM. (2017). De rol van reisinformatie in het wegverkeer [The role of travel information in road traffic]. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.

Knapper, A., van Nes, N., Christoph, M., Hagenzieker, M., & Brookhuis, K. (2016). The use of navigation systems in naturalistic driving. Traffic Injury Prevention, 17(3), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2015.1077385

Koller-Matschke, I. (2018). Proposed cooperation framework & bottlenecks. SOCRATES2.0 Project. Retrieved from https://socrates2.org/download_file/112/184

Kuru, K., & Khan, W. (2020). A framework for the synergistic integration of fully autonomous ground vehicles with smart city. IEEE Access, 9, 923–948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046423

Liebig, T., Piatkowski, N., Bockermann, C., & Morik, K. (2017). Dynamic route planning with real-time traffic predictions. Information Systems, 64, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2016.09.005

Loder, A., Bliemer, M. C., & Axhausen, K. W. (2022). Optimal pricing and investment in a multi-modal city—Introducing a macroscopic network design problem based on the MFD. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 156, 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.12.004

Mahmassani, H. S. (2001). Dynamic network traffic assignment and simulation methodology for advanced system management applications. Networks and Spatial Economics, 1, 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012821505448

Mariotte, G., Leclercq, L., Ramirez, H. G., Krug, J., & Becarie, C. (2021). Assessing traveler compliance with the social optimum: A stated preference study. Travel Behaviour and Society, 23, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.11.005

van der Mede, P. H. J., & Van Berkum, E. C. (1993). The impact of traffic information: Dynamics in route and departure time choice. Delft University of Technology.

Metz, D. (2022). The impact of digital navigation on travel behaviour. UCL Open: Environment, 4, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000041

Peeta, S., & Ziliaskopoulos, A. K. (2001). Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: The past, the present and the future. Networks and Spatial Economics, 1, 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012827724856

Rehrl, K., Grau, J. M. S., Laborda, J., Tzanidaki, J. D., & van Waes, F. (2016). Traffic Management 2.0 – The Win-Win. In Proceedings of the 11th European Congress on ITS, Glasgow. ERTICO – ITS Europe.

Reinolsmann, N., Alhajyaseen, W., Brijs, T., Pirdavani, A., Ross, V., Hussain, Q., & Brijs, K. (2020). Dynamic travel information strategies in advance traveler information systems and their effect on route choices along highways. Procedia Computer Science, 170, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.037

Saw, K., Katti, B., & Joshi, G. (2015). Literature review of traffic assignment: Static and dynamic. International Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2(4), 339–347.

SOCRATES².⁰. (2020). SOCRATES2.0 Cooperation Framework. SOCRATES2.0 Project.

Summerfield, N. S., Deokar, A. V., Xu, M., & Zhu, W. (2021). Should drivers cooperate? Performance evaluation of cooperative navigation on simulated road networks using network DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(5), 1042–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1723719

Sundaram, S., Koutsopoulos, H. N., Ben-Akiva, M., Antoniou, C., & Balakrishna, R. (2011). Simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment for short-term planning applications. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19(1), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2010.08.010

Taale, H. (2008). Integrated anticipatory control of road networks: A game-theoretical approach (Doctoral dissertation). Delft University of Technology.

Taale, H. (2020). Cooperative Route Guidance – A Simulation Study for Stockholm [Report]. Delft University of Technology.

Taale, H. (2022). MARPLE: Description and manual [Report]. Rijkswaterstaat.

Tampère, C. M. J., Corthout, R., Cattrysse, D., & Immers, L. H. (2011). A generic class of first order node models for dynamic macroscopic simulation of traffic flows. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45(1), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.06.004

van Essen, M., Thomas, T., van Berkum, E., & Chorus, C. (2020). Travelers’ compliance with social routing advice: Evidence from SP and RP experiments. Transportation, 47(3), 1047–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9938-2

Vlemmings, T., Vroom, O., Tzanidaki, J., Vreeswijk, J., Hofman, P., Spoelstra, J., & Rodrigues, N. (2017). Contractual agreements in interactive traffic management – Looking for the optimal cooperation of stakeholders within the TM 2.0 concept. In Proceedings of the 12th European Congress on ITS, Strasbourg, France (pp. 19–22).

Wang, Y., Szeto, W. Y., Han, K., & Friesz, T. L. (2018). Dynamic traffic assignment: A review of the methodological advances for environmentally sustainable road transportation applications. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 111, 370–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.011

Wardman, M., Bonsall, P. W., & Shires, J. (1996). Stated preference analysis of driver route choice reaction to variable message sign information. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 4(6), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(97)00003-2

Wilmink, I., Jonkers, E., Snelder, M., & Klunder, G. (2017). Evaluation results of the Amsterdam, Netherlands, practical trial with in-car travel and route advice. Transportation Research Record, 2621(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.3141/2621-05

Yperman, I. (2019). Setting the stage for the deployment of interactive traffic management. SOCRATES2.0 Project.

Zambrano-Martinez, J. L., Calafate, C. T., Soler, D., Lemus-Zúñiga, L.-G., Cano, J.-C., Manzoni, P., & Gayraud, T. (2019). A centralized route-management solution for autonomous vehicles in urban areas. Electronics, 8(7), 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8070722