A Collection of Machine Learning Models for Improved Airport Operations Amidst Adverse Weather Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.1.7487Keywords:
Machine Learning, adverse weather, airport operations, Air traffic flow managementAbstract
In the face of escalating climate change, airports worldwide are finding themselves at the mercy of extreme weather events. This research paper presents a comprehensive system that models key indicators, aiding airport management during such challenging weather conditions. The system adopts an integrated approach, combining various machine learning models to provide a detailed projection of an airport's future state, drawing from past occurrences. The heart of the system is a model that focuses on the airport's peak service rate. This model meticulously correlates weather conditions and runway configurations with the 99th percentile of observed throughput from the training dataset. As such, the peak service rate model provides an estimate of the airport's capacity, which is essential for effective planning and resource allocation. Moreover, the system includes a predictive model that assesses the likelihood of air traffic flow management regulations based on weather data and calendar information. The robustness of this model against noise and uncertainty in the training dataset is fortified by the application of confident learning techniques and the inclusion of monotonic constraints. The system further enhances its capabilities by forecasting the potential entry rate of regulations, expressed in hourly arrivals, providing valuable insights that can guide proactive decision-making. By seamlessly integrating these three models, the system serves as an effective tool for airport operators and airlines. It enables operational optimisation and the development of strategic plans to mitigate the effects of increasing weather-related disruptions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Furtak, K., Wolińska, A. (2023). The impact of extreme weather events as a consequence of climate change on the soil moisture and on the quality of the soil environment and agriculture – a review. CATENA, 231, 107378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107378
Voskaki, A., Budd, T., Mason, K. (2023). The impact of climate hazards to airport systems: a synthesis of the implications and risk mitigation trends. Transport Reviews, 43(4), 652–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2163319
De Vivo, C., Ellena, M., Capozzi, V., Budillon, G., Mercogliano, P. (2022). Risk assessment framework for Mediterranean airports: a focus on extreme temperatures and precipitations and sea level rise. Natural Hazards, 111, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05066-0
Dalmau, R., Attia, J., Gawinowski, G. (2023a). Modelling the impact of adverse weather on airport peak service rate with machine learning. Atmosphere, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14101476
Dalmau, R., Attia, J., Gawinowski, G. (2023b). Modelling the Likelihood of Air Traffic Management Regulations due to Weather at Airports. In: 13th SESAR Innovation Days (SID), Seville, Spain.
Patriarca, R., Simone, F., Di Gravio, G. (2023). Supporting weather forecasting performance management at aerodromes through anomaly detection and hierarchical clustering. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, 119210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119210
Dalmau, R., Gawinowski, G. (2023c). Learning with confidence the likelihood of flight diversion due to adverse weather at destination. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(5), 5615–5624. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3235741
Northcutt, C., Jiang, L., Chuang, I. (2021). Confident learning: Estimating uncertainty in dataset labels. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70, 1373–1411. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12125
Wang, Y. (2011). Prediction of weather impacted airport capacity using ensemble learning. In: IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, pp. 2–612611. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2011.6096002
Wang, Y. (2012). Prediction of weather impacted airport capacity using RUC-2 forecast. In: IEEE/AIAA 31st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), pp. 3–313312. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2012.6382312
Dhal, R., Roy, S., Taylor, C.P., Wanke, C.R. (2013). Forecasting weather-impacted airport capacities for flow contingency management: advanced methods and integration. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-4356
Kicinger, R., Chen, J.-T., Steiner, M., Pinto, J. (2014). Probabilistic airport capacity prediction incorporating weather forecast uncertainty. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-1465
Kicinger, R., Chen, J.-T., Steiner, M., Pinto, J. (2016). Airport capacity prediction with explicit consideration of weather forecast uncertainty. Journal of Air Transportation, 24(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.D0017
Tien, S.-L.A., Taylor, C., Vargo, E., Wanke, C. (2018). Using ensemble weather forecasts for predicting airport arrival capacity. Journal of Air Transportation, 26(3), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.D0105
Choi, S., Kim, Y.J. (2021). Artificial neural network models for airport capacity prediction. Journal of Air Transport Management, 97, 102146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102146
Schultz, M., Reitmann, S., Alam, S. (2021). Predictive classification and understanding of weather impact on airport performance through machine learning. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 131, 103119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103119
Jardines, A., Soler, M., García-Heras, J. (2021). Estimating entry counts and ATFM regulations during adverse weather conditions using machine learning. Journal of Air Transport Management, 95, 102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102109
Mas-Pujol, S., Salamí, E., Pastor, E. (2021). Predict ATFCM weather regulations using a time-distributed recurrent neural network. In: 2021 IEEE/AIAA 40th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC52595.2021.9594303
Lattrez, O., Barragán-Montes, R., Michalski, M. (2022). Predicting airport ATFM regulations using deep convolutional networks. In: 12th SESAR Innovation Days (SID), Budapest, Hungary.
Olive, X. (2019). traffic, a toolbox for processing and analysing air traffic data. Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1518. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01518
Schapire, R.E. (2013). Explaining AdaBoost. In: Schölkopf, B., Luo, Z., Vovk, V. (eds), Empirical Inference: Festschrift in Honor of Vladimir N. Vapnik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41136-6_5
Lundberg, S.M., Erion, G., Chen, H., et al. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9
Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 3149–3157. https://doi.org/10.5555/3294996.3295074
Chen, T., Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: 22nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A.V., Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. In: Proceedings of the 31st Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Montreal, Canada.
Fisher, W.D. (1958). On grouping for maximum homogeneity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(284), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501479
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ramon Dalmau, Jonathan Attia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.