The Associations of Street Network and Urban Form with Walking Frequencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.1.7234Keywords:
Network Analysis, Space Syntax, Walking, Centrality, Reach, Density, Diversity, AccessibilityAbstract
Walking is globally promoted as an urban transport mode that reduces greenhouse gas emissions and increases physical activity. While it is well-known that accessibility at neighbourhood and urban levels impact walking levels, studies on pedestrian travel behaviour are typically based on area-based measures. Network-based measures of street configuration, connectivity, urban density, and land-use diversity have scarcely been applied. This paper aims to find associations of network-based connectivity and accessibility measures with walking frequencies. We applied a series of multivariable ordinal regressions adjusted for distance to various destinations, building-type diversity, socio-demographic variables, and car ownership. We operationalise connectivity as reach, i.e., the number of streets reached through the network, and density and diversity as weighted reach, i.e., the floor area, population, or retail accessible within walkable distances through the network. Street network configurations are described by topological centrality (integration). Results show significant positive associations of reach, attraction reach, and integration with walking frequency, with the best model fits achieved by accessible total floor area and reach within relatively high network radii (1000 – 2000 m and 6 axial steps), indicating that connectivity and access to a variety of attraction and functions, often beyond administrative borders, encourage walking.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ArcGIS Data Appliance. (2022). World Light Gray Base. Retrieved May 20, 2023, from https://doc.arcgis.com/en/data-appliance/2022/maps/world-light-gray-base.htm
Baran, P. K., Rodríguez, D. A., & Khattak, A. J. (2008). Space syntax and walking in a New Urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701803498
Berghauser Pont, M., & Haupt, P. (2021). Spacematrix: Space, density and urban form. nai010 Publishers.
Berghauser Pont, M., & Marcus, L. (2015). What can typology explain that configuration cannot? In Proceedings of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 43:1–43:16). London, UK.
Berghauser Pont, M., Stavroulaki, G., & Marcus, L. (2019). Development of urban types based on network centrality, built density and their impact on pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(8), 1549–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319852632
Berhie, G. K., & Haq, S. (2017). Land use and transport mode choices: Space syntax analysis of American cities. Enquiry (Washington, D.C.), 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v14i1.429
Bobkova, E., Marcus, L., & Berghauser Pont, M. (2017). Multivariable measures of plot systems: Describing the potential link between urban diversity and spatial form based on the spatial capacity concept. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 47.1–47.15). Lisbon, Portugal.
Boeing, G. (2021). Street network models and indicators for every urban area in the world. Geographical Analysis, 54(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12281
Bolin, D., Verendel, V., Berghauser Pont, M., Stavroulaki, I., Ivarsson, O., & Håkansson, E. (2021). Functional ANOVA modelling of pedestrian counts on streets in three European cities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12646
Brant, R. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46(4), 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532457
Burnham, K. P. (2002). Information and likelihood theory: A basis for model selection and inference. In Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (pp. 49–97).
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802539195
Chiaradia, A., Cooper, C. H., & Wedderburn, M. (2014). Network geography and accessibility. In Proceedings of the 12th Transport Practitioners’ Meeting. London, UK.
Chiaradia, A., Hillier, B., Schwander, C., & Wedderburn, M. (2012). Compositional and urban form effects on centres in Greater London. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, 165(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2012.165.1.21
Cooper, C. H. V. (2018). Predictive spatial network analysis for high-resolution transport modeling, applied to cyclist flows, mode choice, and targeting investment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(10), 714–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1432730
Cooper, C. H. V. (2017). Using spatial network analysis to model pedal cycle flows, risk and mode choice. Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.003
Cooper, C. H. V., & Chiaradia, A. J. F. (2020). sDNA: 3-d spatial network analysis for GIS, CAD, Command Line & Python. SoftwareX, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100525
Cooper, C. H. V., Harvey, I., Orford, S., & Chiaradia, A. J. F. (2021). Using multiple hybrid spatial design network analysis to predict longitudinal effect of a major city centre redevelopment on pedestrian flows. Transportation, 48, 643–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10072-0
De Nazelle, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Antó, J. M., Brauer, M., Briggs, D., Braun-Fahrlander, C., Cavill, N., Cooper, A. R., Desqueyroux, H., & Fruin, S. (2011). Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environment International, 37(4), 766–777.
Dovey, K., & Pafka, E. (2020). What is walkability? The urban DMA. Urban Studies, 57(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819727
Ellis, G., Hunter, R., Tully, M. A., Donnelly, M., Kelleher, L., & Kee, F. (2016). Connectivity and physical activity: Using footpath networks to measure the walkability of built environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(1), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515610672
Feng, C., & Zhang, W. (2019). Algorithms for the parametric analysis of metric, directional, and intersection reach. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(8), 1422–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319827299
Fonseca, F., Ribeiro, P. J. G., Conticelli, E., Jabbari, M., Papageorgiou, G., Tondelli, S., & Ramos, R. A. R. (2022). Built environment attributes and their influence on walkability. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(7), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1914793
Fossum, M., & Ryeng, E. O. (2022). Pedestrians’ and bicyclists’ route choice during winter conditions. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 10(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2034524
FramtidsTrondheim. (n.d.). Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://sites.google.com/trondheim.kommune.no/framtidstrondheim/lokale-sentra
Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Saelens, B. E., Leary, L., Cain, K., Conway, T. L., & Hess, P. M. (2010). The development of a walkability index: Application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(13), 924–933. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
GeoNorge. (2024). Statistiske enheter grunnkretser - Kartkatalogen. Retrieved December 2, 2024, from https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/statistiske-enheter-grunnkretser/51d279f8-e2be-4f5e-9f72-1a53f7535ec1
GeoNorge. (2023). Befolkning på rutenett 250 m. Retrieved March 17, 2023, from https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/befolkning-paa-rutenett-250-m/
GeoNorge. (2022). Sentrumssoner. Retrieved June 3, 2022, from https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/sentrumssoner/55b401f3-2ea1-4045-9f87-22ac9d6ecf66
GeoNorge. (2021). FKB-Bygning - Kartkatalogen. Retrieved December 2, 2024, from https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/fkb-bygning/8b4304ea-4fb0-479c-a24d-fa225e2c6e97?search=byggnu
Gössling, S., Choi, A., Dekker, K., & Metzler, D. (2019). The social cost of automobility, cycling and walking in the European Union. Ecological Economics, 158, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.016
Grue, B., Landa-Mata, I., & Langset Flotve, B. (2021). Den nasjonale reisevaneundersøkelsen 2018/19 – nøkkelrapport. Oslo: TØI.
Hall, C. M., & Ram, Y. (2018). Walk score® and its potential contribution to the study of active transport and walkability: A critical and systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61, 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.018
Hillier, B. (1996). Cities as movement economies. Urban Design International, 1(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.1996.5
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., & Iida, S. (2005). Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT 2005 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House.
Kang, C. (2018). The S+5Ds: Spatial access to pedestrian environments and walking in Seoul, Korea. Cities, 77, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.019
Kartverket. (2024). Høydedata. Retrieved August 3, 2024, from https://hoydedata.no/LaserInnsyn2/
Kartverket. (2021). Kartverket, Flyfoto. Retrieved September 24, 2022, from https://www.kartverket.no/til-lands/flyfoto
Knapskog, M., & Peters, S. (2021). Characteristics of walking strategies affecting their usefulness and effect: Studies of walking strategies in Haugesund, Trondheim, and Ås (No. TØI Rapport 1839/2021).
Knight, P. L., & Marshall, W. E. (2015). The metrics of street network connectivity: Their inconsistencies. Journal of Urbanism, 8(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909515
Koohsari, M., Owen, N., Cerin, E., Giles-Corti, B., & Sugiyama, T. (2016). Walkability and walking for transport: Characterizing the built environment using space syntax. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13(1), Article 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0448-9
Koohsari, M. J., Sugiyama, T., Lamb, K. E., Villanueva, K., & Owen, N. (2014). Street connectivity and walking for transport: Role of neighborhood destinations. Preventive Medicine, 66, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.019
Lahoorpoor, B., & Levinson, D. M. (2020). Catchment if you can: The effect of station entrance and exit locations on accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 102556.
Lamíquiz, P. J., & López-Domínguez, J. (2015). Effects of built environment on walking at the neighbourhood scale: A new role for street networks by modelling their configurational accessibility? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.003
Lee, I.-M., & Buchner, D. M. (2008). The importance of walking to public health. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(S512–S518). https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0
Legeby, A., Koch, D., & Abshirini, E. (2017). Characterizing urban centres: Reading configuration as point, line, field. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 78:1–78:16). Lisbon, Portugal.
Manum, B., & Nordstrom, T. (2013). Integrating bicycle network analysis in urban design: Improving bikeability in Trondheim by combining space syntax and GIS methods using the place syntax tool. In Proceedings of the 9th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 1–14). Seoul, South Korea.
Marcus, L., Pont, M. B., & Bobkova, E. (2017). Cities as accessible densities and diversities: Adding attraction variables to configurational analysis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 167.1–167.12). Lisbon, Portugal.
McCormack, G. R., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., du Toit, L., & Owen, N. (2008). Objective versus perceived walking distances to destinations: Correspondence and predictive validity. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507300560
Netto, V. M., Saboya, R., Vargas, J. C., Figueiredo, L., Freitas, C., & Pinheiro, M. (2012). The convergence of patterns in the city: Isolating the effects of architectural morphology on movement and activity. In Proceedings of the 8th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 8167:1–8167:32). Santiago, Chile.
Norwegian Building Authority. (2022). Retrieved June 3, 2022, from https://dibk.no/verktoy-og-veivisere/andre-fagomrader/hvor-stort-kan-du-bygge/hvor-stort-kan-du-bygge/dette-er-bruksareal-t-bra/
Ozbil, A., & Peponis, J. (2012). The effects of urban form on walking to transit. In Proceedings of the 8th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 8030:1–8030:15). Santiago, Chile.
Ozbil, A., Yesiltepe, D., Argin, G., & Rybarczyk, G. (2021). Children’s active school travel: Examining the combined perceived and objective built-environment factors from space syntax. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010286
Pafka, E., & Dovey, K. (2017). Walkable access. In Mapping Urbanities: Morphologies, Flows, Possibilities (pp. 41–61). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315309170
Pearce, D. M., Matsunaka, R., Oba, T., & Yamamoto, S. (2021). Utilising dedicated pedestrian networks to understand the relationship between accessibility and pedestrian density in Asian cities. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 5(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V5-N2-150-161
Peponis, J., Bafna, S., & Zhang, Z. (2008). The connectivity of streets: Reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(5), 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33088
Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2006). The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(5), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045
Rokseth, L. S., Manum, B., & Nordström, T. (2019). Assessing cities: Applying GIS-based methods for mapping cross-scale spatial indicators. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 352, 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012055
Royston, P. (2013). Boxtid: Stata module to fit Box-Tidwell and exponential regression models.
Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. L. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(7 Suppl), S550–S566.
Salvo, G., Lashewicz, B. M., Doyle-Baker, P. K., & McCormack, G. R. (2018). Neighbourhood built environment influences on physical activity among adults: A systematized review of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050897
Sarkar, C., Webster, C., & Gallacher, J. (2018). Neighbourhood walkability and incidence of hypertension: Findings from the study of 429,334 UK Biobank participants. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 221(3), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.009
Schlossberg, M., Greene, J., Phillips, P. P., Johnson, B., & Parker, B. (2006). School trips: Effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976755
Schön, P., Heinen, E., Rangul, V., Sund, E. R., & Manum, B. (2024). The impact of street network connectivity on active school travel: Norway’s HUNT study. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241235978
Schwalb-Willmann, J. (2022). basemaps: A lightweight package to access spatial basemaps from open sources such as “OpenStreetMap,” “Carto,” “Mapbox,” and others in R.
Scoppa, M. D., & Peponis, J. (2015). Distributed attraction: The effects of street network connectivity upon the distribution of retail frontage in the city of Buenos Aires. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42(2), 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1068/b130051p
Sevtsuk, A., & Mekonnen, M. (2012). Urban network analysis: A new toolbox for ArcGIS. Revue internationale de géomatique, 22(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.3166/rig.22.287-305
Sharmin, S., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2018). Meta-analysis of the relationships between space syntax measures and pedestrian movement. Transport Reviews, 38(4), 524–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1365101
Shields, R., Gomes da Silva, E. J., Lima e Lima, T., & Osorio, N. (2021). Walkability: A review of trends. Journal of Urbanism. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1936601
Smith, M., Hosking, J., Woodward, A., Witten, K., MacMillan, A., Field, A., Baas, P., & Mackie, H. (2017). Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14, Article 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9
Ståhle, A. (2008). Compact sprawl: Exploring public open space and contradictions in urban density. KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Architecture.
Ståhle, A., Marcus, L., Karlström, A., & Koch, D. (2010). Place syntax—Geographic accessibility with axial lines. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.
Statens Vegvesen. (2019). Den nasjonale reisevaneundersøkelsen 2018/2019. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://www.vegvesen.no/fag/fokusomrader/nasjonal-transportplan/den-nasjonale-reisevaneundersokelsen/reisevaner-2019/
Statistics Norway. (2002). Tettsted [Variable definition]. Retrieved July 14, 2024, from https://www.ssb.no/a/metadata/conceptvariable/vardok/141/nb
Statistics Norway. (2020). Classification of type of building / cadastre. Retrieved June 13, 2022, from https://www.ssb.no/en/klass/klassifikasjoner/31
Stavroulaki, G., Koch, D., Legeby, A., Marcus, L., Ståhle, A., & Berghauser Pont, M. (2019). Documentation PST 20191122. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25718.55364
Trøndelag i Tall. (2023). Befolkning i delområder og grunnkretser | Trøndelag i tall. Retrieved April 24, 2023, from https://trondelagitall.no/statistikk/befolkning-i-delomrader-og-grunnkretser
Trondheim kommune. (2022). Trondheim kommune. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://www.trondheim.kommune.no/aktuelt/om-kommunen/statistikk/befolkningsstatistikk/
Turner, A. (2007). From axial to road-centre lines: A new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3), 539–555.
Vale, D. S., Saraiva, M., & Pereira, M. (2016). Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(1), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.593
Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., McCormack, G. R., Timperio, A., Middleton, N., Beesley, B., & Trapp, G. (2012). How far do children travel from their homes? Exploring children’s activity spaces in their neighborhood. Health and Place, 18(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.019
Wang, Z., Han, Q., de Vries, B. (2019). Land use/land cover and accessibility: Implications of the correlations for land use and transport planning. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 12(4), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-018-9278-2
Wegener, M., & Fürst, F. (2004). Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art. University Library of Munich, Germany.
Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0600600104
Zhu, J., Wang, X., Hu, L., Huang, J., Jiang, K., Zhang, Y., Lin, S., & Zhu, J. (2022). abess: A fast best-subset selection library in Python and R. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23, 1–7.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Peter Schön, Eva Heinen , Bendik Manum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
