Exploring accessibility conditions for bike–train commuting: A qualitative study among university staff in Belgium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2026.26.2.8222Keywords:
bike-train commuting, perceived accessibility, station accessibilityAbstract
The integration of cycling and rail transport is a key element of sustainable commuting, yet its success depends on the accessibility of stations, their surrounding environments, and destinations. While quantitative studies have extensively analysed infrastructural and behavioural determinants of bike–train use, fewer have examined how users perceive accessibility in practice. This article explores how accessibility conditions shape the bike–train commuting experience in Flanders, Belgium. Drawing on five focus groups with university staff across four campuses with varying levels of bike–train accessibility, the analysis identifies critical accessibility dimensions at both the home-end and activity-end of trips. Physical accessibility factors, including bicycle parking availability, visibility and proximity to platforms, strongly shape users’ evaluations of station quality. Accessibility is further influenced by the presence of cycle highways, multiple station entrances, and the availability and coverage of shared bicycle systems. Beyond physical elements, perceived accessibility is affected by train frequency and reliability, ease of use, perceived safety, legibility and design of the public realm, and the atmosphere and services provided at stations. The findings demonstrate that accessibility challenges and expectations differ substantially between home-end and activity-end stations: the former is primarily evaluated based on functional access to platforms, while the latter is judged more broadly on service reliability and the comfort of the station environment. While limited to current users, this study offers qualitative evidence on how accessibility conditions shape the usability of bike–train commuting, informing policies aimed at strengthening multimodal integration.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Adnan, M., Altaf, S., Bellemans, T., Yasar, A.-U.-H., & Shakshuki, E. M. (2018). Last-mile travel and bicycle sharing system in small/medium sized cities: user’s preferences investigation using hybrid choice model. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(12), 4721–4731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0849-5
Bertolini, L. (1999). Spatial development patterns and public transport: The application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Planning Practice and Research, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459915724
Bonham, J., & Koth, B. (2009). Universities and the cycling culture. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.006
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brons, M., Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2008). Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.08.002
Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press.
Caset, F., Teixeira, F. M., Derudder, B., Boussauw, K., & Witlox, F. (2019). Planning for nodes, places, and people in Flanders and Brussels: An empirical railway station assessment tool for strategic decision-making. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 12(1), 811–837. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2019.1483
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Geurs, K. T., La Paix, L., & van Weperen, S. (2016). A multi-modal network approach to model public transport accessibility impacts of bicycle-train integration policies. European Transport Research Review, 8(4), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-016-0212-x
Giansoldati, M., Danielis, R., & Rotaris, L. (2020). Train-feeder modes in Italy. Is there a role for active mobility?. Research in Transportation Economics, 86, Article 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100990
Groenendijk, L., Rezaei, J., & Correia, G. (2018). Incorporating the travellers’ experience value in assessing the quality of transit nodes: A Rotterdam case study. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(4), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.007
Halldórsdóttir, K., Nielsen, O. A., & Prato, C. G. (2017). Home-end and activity-end preferences for access to and egress from train stations in the Copenhagen region. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(10), 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1317888
Heinen, E., & Bohte, W. (2014). Multimodal commuting to work by public transport and bicycle: Attitudes toward mode choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2468(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.3141/2468-13
Heinen, E., & Buehler, R. (2019). Bicycle parking: A systematic review of scientific literature on parking behaviour, parking preferences, and their influence on cycling and travel behaviour. Transport Reviews, 39(5), 630–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1590477
Jacobson, J., & Forsyth, A. (2008). Seven American TODs: Good practices for urban design in transit-oriented development projects. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1(2), 51–88. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v1i2.67
Jamei, E., Chan, M., Chau, H. W., Gaisie, E., & Lättman, K. (2022). Perceived accessibility and key influencing factors in transportation. Sustainability, 14(17), Article 10806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710806
Janssens, D., Ectors, W., & Paul, R. (2023). Onderzoek verplaatsingsgedrag (2021-2022): Analyse Rapport: Vlaanderen [Travel behaviour survey (2021-2022): Analysis report: Flanders]. Vlaamse Overheid – Departement Mobiliteit en Openbare Werken.
Jones, T., Harms, L., & Heinen, E. (2016). Motives, perceptions and experiences of electric bicycle owners and implications for health, wellbeing and mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 53, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.04.006
Jonkeren, O., & Kager, R. (2020). Bicycle parking at train stations in the Netherlands: Travellers’ behaviour and policy options. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 40, Article 100581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100581
Jonkeren, O., Kager, R., Harms, L., & te Brömmelstroet, M. (2019). The bicycle-train travellers in the Netherlands: personal profiles and travel choices. Transportation, 48(1), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10061-3
Kager, R., Bertolini, L., & te Brömmelstroet, M. (2016). Characterisation of and reflections on the synergy of bicycles and public transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.01.015
Kager, R., & Harms, L. (2017). Synergies from improved cycling-transit integration: Towards an integrated urban mobility system [Working paper No. 2017/23]. The International Transport Forum Discussion Papers. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ce404b2e-en
Kosmidis, I., & Müller-Eie, D. (2023). The synergy of bicycles and public transport: a systematic literature review. Transport Reviews, 44(1), 34–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2222911
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research [5th ed.]. Sage Publications.
Krygsman, S., Dijst, M., & Arentze, T. (2004). Multimodal public transport : An analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio. Transport Policy, 11(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.12.001
La Paix, L., Cherchi, E., & Geurs, K. (2020). Role of perception of bicycle infrastructure on the choice of the bicycle as a train feeder mode. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(6), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1765223
La Paix Puello, L., & Geurs, K. (2015). Modelling observed and unobserved factors in cycling to railway stations: Application to transit-oriented-developments in the Netherlands. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 15(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2015.15.1.3057
Labo Ruimte. (2021). Metro-polis. Naar een spoorgedreven territoriale transitie voor Vlaanderen: Eindrapport verkennend onderzoek [Metro-polis. Towards a rail-driven territorial transition in Flanders: Final report exploratory research]. https://www.vlaamsbouwmeester.be/sites/default/files/2024-10/20230705_Metropolis_FINAL REPORT_web.pdf
Lee, J., Choi, K., & Leem, Y. (2015). Bicycle-based transit-oriented development as an alternative to overcome the criticisms of the conventional transit-oriented development. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(10), 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2014.923547
Manaugh, K., Boisjoly, G., & El-Geneidy, A. (2016). Overcoming barriers to cycling: understanding frequency of cycling in a University setting and the factors preventing commuters from cycling on a regular basis. Transportation, 44(4), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9682-x
Martens, K. (2004). The bicycle as a feedering mode: Experiences from three European countries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9(4), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2004.02.005
Martens, K. (2006). Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(4), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.010
Moinse, D. (2024). A systematic literature review on station area integrating micromobility in Europe: A twenty-first century transit-oriented development. In F. Belaïd, A. Arora (Eds.), Smart Cities: Social and Environmental Challenges and Opportunities for Local Authorities (pp. 171-204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35664-3_12
Molin, E., & Maat, K. (2015). Bicycle parking demand at railway stations: Capturing price-walking trade offs. Research in Transportation Economics, 53, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.014
Nello-Deakin, S., & te Brömmelstroet, M. (2021). Scaling up cycling or replacing driving? Triggers and trajectories of bike–train uptake in the Randstad area. Transportation, 48(6), 3239-3267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10165-9
Nematchoua, M. K., Deuse, C., Cools, M., & Reiter, S. (2019). Evaluation of the potential of classic and electric bicycle commuting as an impetus for the transition towards environmentally sustainable cities: A case study of the university campuses in Liege, Belgium. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, Article 109544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109544
Ploeger, J., & Oldenziel, R. (2022). Bicycle-oriented development: How the Dutch railroad shaped urban planning and discovered cyclists along the way, 1960-1990. Journal of Urban History, 50(5), 997-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/00961442221133080
Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2015). Transit-oriented design in the Netherlands. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15573263
Robillard, A., Boisjoly, G., & van Lierop, D. (2023). Transit-oriented development and bikeability: Classifying public transport station areas in Montreal, Canada. Transport Policy, 148, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.12.012
Rybels, S., Vanoutrive, T., Corradi, D., & Coppens, T. (2024). Bicycle commuting beyond short distances: built environment, socio-demographic factors and type of bicycle influencing the choice to cycle to three university campuses. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 24(4), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2024.24.4.7013
Samyn, W., Lagrou, R., & Goetgebuer, C. (2025). Onderzoek verplaatsingsgedrag analyserapport 2025 [Research on travel behavior analysis report 2025]. Vlaamse Overheid – Departement Mobiliteit en Openbare Werken. https://assets.vlaanderen.be/image/upload/v1747834928/repositories-prd/finaal-analyserapport-vg7_x6csy3.pdf
Shelat, S., Huisman, R., & van Oort, N. (2018). Analysing the trip and user characteristics of the combined bicycle and transit mode. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.017
Sherwin, H., Parkhurst, G., Robbins, D., & Walker, I. (2011). Practices and motivations of travellers making rail-cycle trips. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 164(3), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.2011.164.3.189
Vale, D. S., Saraiva, M., & Pereira, M. (2015). Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(1), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.593
Vale, D. S., Viana, C. M., & Pereira, M. (2018). The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon’s subway network. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.004
van Mil, J. F. P., Leferink, T. S., Annema, J. A., & van Oort, N. (2020). Insights into factors affecting the combined bicycle-transit mode. Public Transport, 13(3), 649-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-020-00240-2
van Wee, B. (2015). Accessible accessibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.018
Vanoutrive, T., van Malderen, L., Jourquin, B., Thomas, I., Verhetsel, A., & Witlox, F. (2010). Mobility management measures by employers: Overview and exploratory analysis for Belgium. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 10(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2010.10.2.2878
Vanoutrive, T., van Malderen, L., Jourquin, B., Thomas, I., Verhetsel, A., & Witlox, F. (2011). Rail commuting to workplaces in Belgium: A multilevel approach. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 6(2), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2011.555599
Verachtert, E., Mayeres, I., Vermeiren, K., van der Meulen, M., Vanhulsel, M., Vanderstraeten, G., Loris, I., Mertens, G., Engelen, G., & Poelmans, L. (2023). Mapping regional accessibility of public transport and services in support of spatial planning: A case study in Flanders. Land Use Policy, 133, Article 106873. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2023.106873
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Stijn Rybels, Thomas Vanoutrive
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
