Is anyone going to light the fire? Drivers and barriers in the initiation of flexible use of charging infrastructure on major passenger transport hubs in the Netherlands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2025.25.4.7908Keywords:
Initiation, Collaboration, Drivers and barriers, Flexibility, Charging infrastructure, Major passenger transport hubsAbstract
Third party use of charging infrastructure for electric buses on major passenger transport hubs offers potential to make better use of existing electricity grid capacity, especially given the current lack of grid capacity. This requires flexibility in the charging operation, which is hampered due to lacking ownership of this opportunity to share charging infrastructure. This research aims to develop understanding of the perception of drivers and barriers for stakeholder organizations (SOs) to initiate collaboration on flexible use of this infrastructure. A survey under 141 respondents was applied to collect these perceptions on the drivers and barriers, the most logical initiator and motives behind these choices. Results indicate that presence of sufficient benefits, fitting organizational culture and entrepreneurial freedom are main drivers for initiation of collaboration. No specific barriers stood out. Furthermore, public parties – specifically the transport authority – are indicated as most logical initiator. The paper shows that challenge for initiating collaboration lies in the unclarity around the mandate to take initiative. Although the presence of mandate is not seen as main driver for one’s own organization, it is seen as reason why other organizations should be the initiator. The lacking overall mandate for collaboration causes inertia, and thereby is the reason why the fire is not lit yet. Fortunately, this challenge of ownerless opportunities in complex SO-environments can be overcome, but it does require a new way of looking at how infrastructure is applied and managed.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Adhikari, G. P. (2021). Calculating the sample size in quantitative studies. Scholars' Journal, 4(1). 14-29. https://doi.org/10.3126/scholars.v4i1.42458
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781
Ashkezari, L. S., Kaleybar, H. J., & Brenna, M. (2024). Electric bus charging infrastructures: Technologies, standards, and configurations. IEEE Access, 12, 80505-80528. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3410880
Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2010). CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.229
Bartlett II, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50.
Bartuševičienė, I., & Šakalytė, E. (2013). Organizational assessment: effectiveness vs. efficiency. Social Transformations in Contemporary Society, 1(1), 45-53.
Bijlsma, L., van Amsterdam, H., Dammers, E., & Harbers, A. (2023). Kansen rondom spoorknooppunten: Publieke meerwaarde in gebiedsontwikkeling [Opportunities around rail junctions: Public added value in area development] (Report No. 4455). Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving. https://www.pbl.nl/uploads/default/downloads/pbl-2023-kansen_rondom_het_spoor-4455_0.pdf
Bissel, M., & Becker, S. (2024). Can cargo bikes compete with cars? Cargo bike sharing users rate cargo bikes superior on most motives – especially if they reduced car ownership. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 101, 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.12.018
Block, T., & Paredis, E. (2013). Urban development projects catalyst for sustainable transformations: The need for entrepreneurial political leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 181-188. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.021
Böcker, L., & Meelen, T. (2016). Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.004
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Buhr, N. (2002). A structuration view on the initiation of environmental reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(1), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2000.0441
Cai, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, C., & Wang, B. (2018). A parking space allocation method to make a shared parking strategy for appertaining parking lots of public buildings. Sustainability, 11(1), Article 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010120
Cantarelli, C. C., & Flyvbjerg, B. (2015). Decision making and major transport infrastructure projects: The role of project ownership. In R. Hickman, M. Givoni, D. Bonilla & D. Banister (Eds.), Handbook on Transport and Development (pp. 380-393). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857937261.00032
Carbonara, N., Costantino, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2014). Concession period for PPPs: A win–win model for a fair risk sharing. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.007
Channon, D. F., & Caldart, A. A. (2015). McKinsey 7S model. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom120005
Cleophas, C., Cottrill, C., Ehmke, J. F., & Tierney, K. (2018). Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 273(3), 801–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.037
College van Rijksadviseurs, & Bureau Spoorbouwmeester. (2023, December 5). Advies Knooppunten - Verstandig verdichten [Junction Advice - Sensible densification]. https://www.collegevanrijksadviseurs.nl/adviezen-publicaties/brieven/2023/12/07/brief-hoogstedelijke-knooppunten
Deken, F., Berends, H., Gemser, G., & Lauche, K. (2018). Strategizing and the initiation of interorganizational collaboration through prospective resourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1920-1950. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0687
Dentchev, N. A., & Heene, A. (2004). Toward stakeholder responsibility and stakeholder motivation: Systemic and holistic perspectives on corporate sustainability. In S. Sharma, & M. Starik (Eds.), Stakeholders, the environment and society: New perspectives in research on corporate sustainability (pp. 117-139). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423629.00012
Diab, I., Mouli, G. R. C., & Bauer, P. (2023). Opportunity charging of electric buses directly from a DC metro catenary and without storage. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles & International Transportation Electrification Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESARS-ITEC57127.2023.10114818
Elmahroug, M. H., Tutesigensi, A., & Brookes, N. J. (2014). Integrating external stakeholder identification and project initiation in civil engineering infrastructure projects. In A. Raiden, & E. Aboagye-Nimo (Eds.), Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference (pp. 935-944). Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Enexis Netbeheer. (2022, July). Handreiking: Transportcapaciteit efficiënt gebruiken: oplossingsrichtingen [Guidance: Using transport capacity efficiently: solutions]. https://www.enexisgroep.nl/media/3205/handreiking-transportcapaciteit-efficient-gebruiken-afname-en-teruglevering.pdf
Enexis Netbeheer. (n.d.). Wie is Enexis Netbeheer? [Who is Enexis Netbeheer?]. Retrieved March 17, 2024, from https://www.enexis.nl/over-ons/wie-is-enexis-netbeheer
European Commission. (n.d.). Energy sharing and energy communities. Clean energy for EU islands. https://clean-energy-islands.ec.europa.eu/countries/finland/legal/community-energy-policies/energy-sharing-and-energy-communities
Fernández-Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Cardador, A., Cucala, A. P., & Falvo, M. C. (2019). Energy Efficiency and Integration of Urban Electrical Transport Systems: EVs and Metro-Trains of Two Real European Lines. Energies, 12(3), Article 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030366
Gemeente Amsterdam. (2024). Herijking Deelnemingen 2024 [Overview of participations 2024]. https://openresearch.amsterdam/nl/media/inline/2024/5/14/herijking_deelnemingen_2024.pdf?is_http_request=true&auth_replay_token=HP1jg0ukDsmFw7JgDqnM
Gustafson, P., & Hertting, N. (2016). Understanding participatory governance: An analysis of participants’ motives for participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015626298
Hamers, D., Kuiper, R., van der Wouden, R., van Dam, F., van Gaalen, F., van Hoorn, A., van Minnen, J., Pols, L., & van Eck, J. R. (2021). Grote opgaven in een beperkte ruimte: Ruimtelijke keuzes voor een toekomstbestendige leefomgeving [Major challenges in a limited space: Spatial choices for a future-proof living environment] (Report No. 4318). Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving. https://www.pbl.nl/uploads/default/downloads/pbl-2021-grote-opgaven-in-een-beperkte-ruimte-4318_1.pdf
Hauslbauer, A., Verse, B., Guenther, E., & Petzoldt, T. (2023). Access over ownership: Barriers and psychological motives for adopting mobility as a service (MaaS) from the perspective of users and non-users. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 23, Article 101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.101005
Hsu, S.-H., Wang, Y.-C., & Tzeng, S.-F. (2007). The source of innovation: Boundary spanner. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(10), 1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360701596274
Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5(3), 401-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903032000146964
European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, World Economic Forum, & International Energy Agency. (2024, October 15). Europe's clean energy future can only be delivered through unified action. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/europe-s-clean-energy-future-can-only-be-delivered-through-unified-action
Israel, G. D. (1992). Sampling the evidence of extension program impact. Program Evaluation and Organizational Development, 5, 1-9.
Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh006
Karam, A., Hussein, M., & Reinau, K. H. (2021). Analysis of the barriers to implementing horizontal collaborative transport using a hybrid fuzzy Delphi-AHP approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, Article 128943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128943
Keszey, T. (2018). Boundary spanners’ knowledge sharing for innovation success in turbulent times. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(5), 1061-1081. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0033
Netbeheer Nederland, Autoriteit Consument & Markt, Rijk, Interprovinciaal Overleg, Provincie Limburg, Provincie Noord-Brabant, Vereniging van Nederlandse Gemeenten, Nationaal Programma Regionale Energiestrategie, VNO-NCW, Vereniging voor Energie, Milieu en Water, CES-cluster Rotterdam-Moerdijk, CES-cluster Chemelot, CES-cluster 6, Energie-Nederland, & Nederlandse Vereniging Duurzame Energie. (2022). Landelijk Actieprogramma Netcongestie [National Action Programme for Grid Congestion]. https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-4a4a6f1bcb4f30278f4205aeb085c3208f62e8a6/pdf
Langfield-Smith, K. (2008). The relations between transactional characteristics, trust and risk in the start-up phase of a collaborative alliance. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.001
Lavrijssen, S., & Braggaar, D. (2020). Kink in de kabel: Voorstellen voor het proactiever afstemmen van vraag en aanbod van netwerkcapaciteit in de energietransitie [Hitch in the cable: Proposals for a more proactive coordination of supply and demand for network capacity in the energy transition]. Het Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Energierecht, 2020(2), 60-71.
Li, F., Guo, X., Zhou, L., Wu, J., & Li, T. (2022). A capacity matching model in a collaborative urban public transport system: integrating passenger and freight transportation. International Journal of Production Research, 60(20), 6303–6328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1991021
Li, Z., Shalaby, A., Roorda, M. J., & Mao, B. (2021). Urban rail service design for collaborative passenger and freight transport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 147, Article 102205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102205
Machado, B., Pimentel, C., & de Sousa, A. (2023). Integration planning of freight deliveries into passenger bus networks: Exact and heuristic algorithms. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 171, Article 103645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103645
Mair, J., & Reischauer, G. (2017). Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: Institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations. Technological Forecasting & and Social Change, 125, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.023
Melander, L., & Wallström, H. (2022). The benefits of green horizontal networks: Lessons learned from sharing charging infrastructure for electric freight vehicles. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1835–1846. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3222
Milanova, V., & Maas, P. (2017). Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting. Journal of Business Research, 75, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.002
Metropoolregio Rotterdam Den Haag. (n.d.). Concessies Openbaar Vervoer gebiedsontwikkeling [Concessions Public Transport area development]. Retrieved March 17, 2024, from https://www.mrdh.nl/project/concessies-openbaar-vervoer
Mullaly, M. (2014). The role of agency in project initiation decisions. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(3), 518–535. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-09-2013-0043
Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0015-4
OECD. (2017). The governance of land use in the Netherlands: The case of Amsterdam. OECD Regional Development Studies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264274648-en
Pennings, R., Wiegmans, B., & Spit, T. (2020). Can we have our cake and still eat it? A review of flexibility in the structural spatial development and passenger transport relation in developing countries. Sustainability, 12(15), Article 6091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156091
Pennings, R., Wiegmans, B., & Spit, T. (2023a). Are we missing the bus? A case study on flexibility options for charging infrastructure at the Amsterdam Central Station. Infrastructures, 8(3), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8030047
Pennings, R., Wiegmans, B., & Spit, T. (2023b). Can we do more with less? Analyzing the organization of flexibility of space and infrastructure at UDCs: A case study for Food Center Amsterdam. Logistics, 7(4), Article 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7040090
Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. Harper & Row.
Poitras, J., & Bowen, R. E. (2002). A framework for understanding consensus-building initiation. Negotiation Journal, 18, 211-232. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016382309621
ProRail. (2022). Bijlage 25 Stations (paragraaf 7.3.2) [Attachment 25 Stations (paragraph 7.3.2)]. In Netverklaring 2023 [Network statement] (pp. 277 - 280). https://stations.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Stationsklasse_Netverklaring-2023.pdf
RET. (n.d.). Opdrachtgevers [Clients]. Retrieved March 17, 2024, from https://corporate.ret.nl/financien/opdrachtgevers
Rijksoverheid. (n.d.). Taken van een gemeente [Tasks of a municipality]. Retrieved March 17, 2024, from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/gemeenten/taken-gemeente
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Rongen, T., Tillema, T., Arts, J., Alonso-González, M. J., & Witte, J.-J. (2022). An analysis of the mobility hub concept in the Netherlands: Historical lessons for its implementation. Journal of Transport Geography, 104, Article 103419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103419
Safford, H. D., Sawyer, S. C., Kocher, S. D., Hiers, J. K., & Cross, M. (2017). Linking knowledge to action: The role of boundary spanners in translating ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(10), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1731
Sánchez-Silva, M. (2018). Managing infrastructure systems through changeability. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 25(1), Article 04018040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000467
Serrat, O. (2017). Knowledge solutions: Tools, methods, and approaches to drive organizational performance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9
Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1-22.
Diran, D., van Veenstra, A. F., & Geerdink, T. (2021). Knelpunten bij het data gedreven werken aan de energietransitie in de gebouwde omgeving [Bottlenecks in data-driven work on the energy transition in the built environment]. TNO. https://publications.tno.nl/publication/34638659/IVltAi/TNO-2021-R10383.pdf
Toering, A., de Bruijne, M., & Veeneman, W. (2025). Exploring governance challenges of sustainable infrastructure development on the nexus between energy and mobility. npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44333-024-00018-0
Torres-Rincón, S., Villarraga, D. F., & Sánchez-Silva, M. (2020). Conceptual and numerical analysis of flexibility in infrastructure systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000546
Transdev Netherlands. (n.d.). Over ons [About us]. Retrieved March 17, 2024, from https://www.wijzijntransdev.nl/nl/over-ons
van den Brink, M., Edelenbos, J., van den Brink, A., Verweij, S., van Etteger, R., & Busscher, T. (2019). To draw or to cross the line? The landscape architect as boundary spanner in Dutch river management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 186, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.018
van der Horst, K., Diab, I., Mouli, G. R. C., & Bauer, P. (2023). Methods for increasing the potential of integration of EV chargers into the DC catenary of electric transport grids: A trolleygrid case study. eTransportation, 18, Article 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2023.100271
van Klingeren, F., & de Moor, T. (2024). Ecological, financial, social and societal motives for cooperative energy prosumerism: measuring preference heterogeneity in a Belgian energy cooperative. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 14, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-024-00444-5
Verweij, S., & van Meerkerk, I. (2020). Do public–private partnerships achieve better time and cost performance than regular contracts? Public Money & Management, 41(4), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1752011
Villani, E., & Phillips, N. (2020). Formal organizations and interstitial spaces: Catalysts, complexity, and the initiation of cross-field collaboration. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019897235
Wang, D., Wang, X., Liu, M., Liu, H., & Liu, B. (2020). Managing public–private partnerships: A transmission pattern of underlying dynamics determining project performance. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 28(4), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-01-2020-0034
Wiegmans, B. W., & Geerlings, H. (2010). Sustainable port innovations: Barriers and enablers for successful implementation. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 3(3), 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1504/WRITR.2010.034664
Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K., & Fils-Aime, F. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, Article 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206
Yström, A., Agogué, M., & Rampa, R. (2021). Preparing an organization for sustainability transitions—The making of boundary spanners through design training. Sustainability, 13(14), Article 8073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148073
Zografos, K. G., Madas, M. A., & Androutsopoulos, K. N. (2016). Increasing airport capacity utilisation through optimum slot scheduling: review of current developments and identification of future needs. Journal of Scheduling, 20(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-016-0496-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rogier Pennings, Bart Wiegmans, Tejo Spit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
