The role of the (e-)bike: a mode choice model for short distances

Authors

  • Chantal Huurman Witteveen+Bos
  • Adam Pel
  • Winnie Daamen
  • Kees Maat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2024.24.4.6965

Abstract

The bicycle is a very important mode for travel in various countries, particularly in the Netherlands. However, it is in practice often modelled with less detail than other urban modes, such as the car and public transport. Moreover, the increasing use of e-bikes and the differences with conventional bikes show that more research into this transport mode is needed. E-bikes require less physical effort and allow higher speeds, making the e-bike suitable for longer distances. The goals of this research are to (1) create a mode choice model that predicts an accurate modal split for urban areas in the Netherlands and this model is used to (2) find significant factors that influence the modal split, in order to support municipalities of Dutch urban areas to stimulate the use of the (e-)bike. Within both goals, potential differences between conventional bikes and e-bikes are considered. A conceptual model, following from the literature, describes the assumed modal choice including factors relevant to cycling. Data was used mainly from the Dutch National Travel Survey (ODiN). Discrete choice models, a multinomial logit and a nested logit, are estimated to identify significant influencing factors. Results show that a nested logit model is the most explanatory one compared to the other models, with a rho-square-bar of 0.469. The model includes 15 main variables, 3 quadratic components and 4 interaction effects. The nested structure is formed by a correlation between the bike and the e-bike. The factors that show to be generally highly influential for the bike and the e-bike are the travel distance, owning a driver’s license and street density. The model is practically applicable for municipalities to form expectations in the modal shift for changes in their networks or policies. However, modelling these changes has not been validated and thus needs further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Barberan, A., Silva, J. D. A. E. and Monzon, A. (2017). Factors influencing bicycle use: a binary choice model with panel data. Transportation Research Procedia, 27, 253.

von Behren, S., Schubert, R., and Chlond, B. (2020). International comparison of psychological factors and their influence on travel behavior in hybrid cities. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 36.

Bicycle Dutch (2018). Dutch cycling figures.

Buehler, R., and Dill, J. (2015). Bikeway Networks: A review of effects on cycling. Transport Reviews, 36, 9.

Buehler, R. (2012). Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: The role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17, 525.

CBS (2022a). Onderweg in Nederland (ODiN) 2018-2020. Centraal Bureau Voor De Statistiek https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/longread/rapportages/2022/onderweg-in-nederland--odin---2018-2020

CBS (2022b). StatLine. Centraal Bureau Voor De Statistiek. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/

CBS (2022c). Stedelijkheid (van een gebied). Centraal Bureau Voor De Statistiek. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/onze-diensten/methoden/begrippen/stedelijkheid--van-een-gebied--

Charreire, H., Roda, C., Feuillet, T., Piombini, A., Bardos, H., Rutter, H., Compernolle, S., Mackenbach, J. D., Lakerveld, J., Oppert, J. M., and et al. (2021). Walking, cycling, and public transport for commuting and noncommuting travels across 5 European urban regions: Modal choice correlates and motivations. Journal of Transport Geography, 96, 103196.

Eldeeb, G., Mohamed, M., and Paez, A. (2021). Built for active travel? Investigating the contextual effects of the built environment on transportation mode choice. Journal of Transport Geography, 96, 103158.

Gemeente Rotterdam (2022). Vervoer. https://www.rotterdam.nl/vervoer

Gemeente Amsterdam (2022). Volg het beleid: Verkeer en vervoer. https://www.amsterdam.nl/bestuur-organisatie/volg-beleid/verkeer-vervoer/

Grudgings, N., Hughes, S., and Hagen-Zanker, A. (2021). The comparison and interaction of age and gender effects on cycling mode-share: An analysis of commuting in England and Wales. Journal of Transport and Health, 20, 101004.

Hallberg, M., Rasmussen, T. K., and Rich, J. (2021). Modelling the impact of cycle superhighways and electric bicycles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 149, 397.

Heesch, K. C., Giles-Corti, B., and Turrell, G. (2014). Cycling for transport and recreation: Associations with socioeconomic position, environmental perceptions, and psychological disposition. Preventive Medicine, 63, 29.

Heinen, E., Maat, K., and Van Wee, B. (2012). The effect of work-related factors on the bicycle commute mode choice in the Netherlands. Transportation, 40, 23.

Heinen, E., Maat, K., and Van Wee, B. (2011). The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 102.

Holmgren, J., and Ivehammar, P. (2020). Mode choice in home-to-work travel in mid-size towns: The competitiveness of public transport when bicycling and walking are viable options. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 1635.

Ibeas, A., Dell’Olio, L., Bordagaray M. E., and De Dios Ortúzar, J. (2014). Modelling parking choices considering user heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 70, 41–49.

Kamargianni, M., and Polydoropoulou, A. (2013). Hybrid choice model to investigate effects of teenagers’ attitudes toward walking and cycling on mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Record, 151.

KiM (2018). Cycling Facts 2018.

Ko, J., Lee, S., and Byun, M. (2019). Exploring factors associated with commute mode choice: An application of city-level general social survey data. Transport Policy, 75, 36.

Kroesen, M. (2017). To what extent do e-bikes substitute travel by other modes? Evidence from the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 53, 377.

Mattisson, K., Idris, A. O., Cromley, E., Hakansson, C., Ostergren, P. O., and Jakobsson, K. (2018). Modelling the association between health indicators and commute mode choice: a cross-sectional study in southern Sweden. Journal of Transport & Health, 11, 110.

Muller, S., Tscharaktschiew, S., and Haase, K. (2008). Travel-to-school mode choice modelling and patterns of school choice in urban areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 16, 342.

NDOV loket (2022). https://ndovloket.nl/

Nello-Deakin, S., and Harms, L. (2019). Assessing the relationship between neighbourhood characteristics and cycling: Findings from Amsterdam. Transportation Research Procedia, 41, 17.

Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., and Khreis, H. (2016). Car free cities: Pathway to healthy urban living. Environment International, 94, 251.

Orozco-Fontalvo, M., Arevalo-Tamara, A., Guerrero-Barbosa, T., and Gutierrez-Torres, M. (2018). Bicycle choice modeling: A study of university trips in a small Colombian city. Journal of Transport & Health, 9, 264.

OpenStreetMap (2022). https://www.openstreetmap.org/

Piatkowski, D. P., and Marshall, W. E. (2015). Not all prospective bicyclists are created equal: The role of attitudes, socio-demographics, and the built environment in bicycle commuting. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2, 166.

Rietveld, P., and Daniel, V. (2004). Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38, 531.

Rijsman, L., Van Oort, N., Ton, D., Hoogendoorn, S., Molin, E., and Teijl, T. (2019). Walking and bicycle catchment areas of tram stops: factors and insights.

Rodriguez-Valencia, A., Rosas-Satizabal, D., Unda, R., and Handy, S. (2021). The decision to start commuting by bicycle in Bogota, Colombia: Motivations and influences. Travel Behaviour and Society, 24, 57.

Santos, G., Maoh, H., Potoglou, D., and Brunn, T. V. (2013). Factors influencing modal split of commuting journeys in medium-size European cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 127.

Schneider, F., Jensen, A. F., Daamen, W., and Hoogendoorn, S. (2020). Bicycle accessibility: What can we learn from best-practice examples? Journal of Transport Geography.

Scorrano M., and Danielis, R. (2021). Active mobility in an Italian city: Mode choice determinants and attitudes before and during the Covid-19 emergency. Research in Transportation Economics, 86.

Simsekoglu, O., and Klockner, C. A. (2019). The role of psychological and socio-demographical factors for electric bike use in Norway. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13, 315.

Ton, D., Bekhor, S., Cats, O., Duives, D. C., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., and Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2020). The experienced mode choice set and its determinants: Commuting trips in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 744.

Ton, D., Duives, D. C., Cats, O., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., and Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2019). Cycling or walking? Determinants of mode choice in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 123, 7.

Wati, K., and Tranter, P. J. (2015). Spatial and socio-demographic determinants of South East Queensland students’ school cycling. Journal of Transport Geography, 47, 23.

Witte, A. D., Hollevoet, J., Dobruszkes, F., Hubert, M., and Macharis, C. (2013). Linking modal choice to motility: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 329.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Huurman, C., Pel, A., Daamen, W., & Maat, K. (2024). The role of the (e-)bike: a mode choice model for short distances. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 24(4), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.59490/ejtir.2024.24.4.6965

Issue

Section

Articles