Efficiency Comparison of Various Parking Charge Schemes Considering Daily Travel Cost in a Linear City

Authors

  • Xiaoning Zhang Tongji University
  • Bert van Wee Delft University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2011.11.2.2924

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new duration dependent parking fee regime based on the travel cost for an entire day, rather than a single commute trip. Commuters are assumed to reside at one end of a linear city and work in a business center at the other end. A two-stage differential method is used to derive user equilibrium travel patterns for both morning and evening rush hour commutes. Both individual travel cost and system travel cost are derived as functions of travel demand. We then compare the efficiency of the duration dependent parking fee regime with that of three previously proposed pricing regimes in the context of elastic travel demand. Results show that a pricing regime with both time-varying road tolls and location dependent parking fees is most efficient, followed by a regime with time-varying road tolls alone. Depending on the parking fee rate, a uniform duration-based parking fee regime may or may not be more efficient than a no-pricing regime. Under the duration dependent parking fee regime, an optimal parking fee rate can be obtained by minimizing system cost or maximizing social surplus, which gives rise to a system-wide performance no worse than that in the no-pricing regime.

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
139
Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 20268
|

Downloads

Published

2011-04-01

How to Cite

Zhang, X., & Wee, B. van. (2011). Efficiency Comparison of Various Parking Charge Schemes Considering Daily Travel Cost in a Linear City. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2011.11.2.2924