Spectres
Architectural Theory as Hauntology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/footprint.19.2.7806Abstract
The contemporary sensibility seems increasingly accustomed to observing the blind spots of reality. Architecture, less interested in drawing future visions, channels its utopian tension into scrutinising the past, laying bare in its investigations those absent from History, the lesser stories, what has been forgotten, and what remains unresolved. Following the clues scattered in sociologist Avery Gordon’s book Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination, I will refer to this mode of work as ‘hauntology’ to examine the operational strength of architectural design theory in the present era. The essay, that, essentially seeks to bring Gordon’s social theories into the discipline of architectural theory, suggesting the need to restore the relation between architecture and society, is structured as a theory-fiction about architecture. The first part builds the premises for the subsequent ones, defining words ‘theory’ and ‘spectre’ and the results of their crash. The second part observes a concrete case in which a piece of a city has disappeared while remaining in place. The third part concerns the architectural element ‘space’ that re-emerges when considering architectural theory as an observation of the intangible. Finally, the conclusions will leave the essay somewhat suspended, opening up the necessity for a spectrology of architecture.References
Anthony Vidler, The Architectural Uncanny. Essays in the Modern Unhomely (Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press, 1992).
Anthony Vidler, Warped Space. Art, Architecture, and Anxiety in Modern Culture (Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press, 2009).
Avery Gordon, Cose di fantasmi. Haunting e immaginazione sociologia (Roma: DeriveApprodi, 2022).
Avery Gordon, Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996).
David Wang, ‘Prediction in Theoria: Towards an Interdisciplinary Range of Theories Related to Architecture’, in Architectural Research Quarterly, n. 10 (2006): 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135506000376.
Federico Soriano, ‘Theory’, in Recycle Theory. Dizionario illustrato | Illustrated Dictionary, eds. Sara Marini and Giovanni Corbellini (Macerata: Quodlibet, 2016): 610-612.
Francesco Dal Co, ed. 10 immagini per Venezia (Rome: Officina Edizioni, 1980).
Giorgio Agamben, What is an Apparatus? And Other Essays (Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2009).
Jacques Derrida, Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International (London: Routledge, 1994).
Léna Mauger and Stéphane Remael, The Vanished. The ‘Evaporated’ People of Japan in Stories and Photographs. (New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2016).
Mark Fisher, Ghosts of my Life: Writings on Depression, Hauntology + Lost Futures (London: Zero books, 2022).
Matthew Fuller and Eyal Weizman, Investigative Aesthetics. Conflicts and Commons in the Politics of Truth. (London: Verso 2021).
Mike Davis, City of Quartz. Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (London: Verso, 1990).
Nakamori Hiroki, Shissō no shakaigaku: shinmitsusei to sekinin o meguru shiron (Tokyo: Keiō Gijuku Daigaku Shuppankai, 2017).
Nee Brett, ‘Sanya: Japan’s Internal Colony’, in Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, vol. 6, issue 3 (1974), 12-18.
Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New York. A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan (New York: The Monacelli Press, 1978).
Sara Marini, ‘Magic’, Vesper. Rivista di architettura, arte e teoria | Journal of Architecture, Arts & Theory, no. 6 (2022): 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1400/288552.
Shirley Jackson, The Haunting of Hill House (London: Penguin, 2013).
Sigmund Freud, The Uncanny (New York: Penguin, 2003).
Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alberto Petracchin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.


