Cosmotechnical Difference in Architecture and Urbanism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/footprint.18.2.7744

Abstract

This issue of Footprint explores the intersection between architecture, technology and cosmology. It does so by examining the concept of ‘cosmotechnics’, as proposed by the philosopher Yuk Hui. Cosmotechnics – defined as ‘the unification of the cosmic and moral order through technical activities’ – proposes that technology is not a universal category but always exists in a co-productive relationship with a specific cosmology. While cosmotechnics has fomented new scholarship in philosophy, STS and cultural theory, its implications for architecture remain underexplored. Here, we introduce the concept of cosmotechnics, distinguish it from previous approaches to technology and cosmology, and outline its unique relevance to architectural discourse. In doing so, we present a core theme of the issue: technologies, cosmologies and architectures do not only influence one another, but are indeed inseparable, mutually Introduction Cosmotechnical Difference in Architecture and Urbanism Dulmini Perera and Samuel Koh, editors Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany constitutive, and conjoined in continual coevolution. Finally, we introduce the contributions that comprise the issue – a diverse set of explorations of the theoretical and practical intersections between cosmotechnics and architecture.

 

Author Biographies

Dulmini Perera, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar

Dulmini Perera is a lecturer and researcher at the Bauhaus-Universität Weimar. Her research focuses on the systemic relations between ecological questions and questions concerning technology within the design context. She has published extensively on histories, theories and methods that emerge from design’s encounters with other disciplines that engage with complex living systems (particularly cybernetics, systems sciences and process philosophies) and how the social and political aspects of these encounters keep influencing our present-day knowledge and practice models. Her current research on ecology, technology and cosmology is supported by the DFG (Germany), grant number 508363000.

Samuel Koh, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar

Samuel Koh is a PhD candidate at the Bauhaus-Universität Weimar. His research examines the role of science and technology in the shifting narratives of human purpose in urban planning. His dissertation examines key moments in the history of Western urban thought, focusing on how cosmological ideas have transformed the goals and values of the urban professions. He currently teaches graduate courses on urban history and theory at the Technische Hochschule Nürnberg.

References

Akkach, Samer. Cosmology and Architecture in Premodern Islam: An Architectural Reading of Mystical Ideas. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005.

Allan, Bentley. Scientific Cosmology and International Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Axel, Nick, Kenny Cupers, and Nikolaus Hirsch, eds. Coloniality of Infrastructure. E-Flux Architecture. Accessed June 13, 2024. https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/coloniality-infrastructure/.

Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books, 1990.

Braham, William W., Jonathan A. Hale, and John Stanislav Sadar, eds. Rethinking Technology: A Reader in Architectural Theory. London: Routledge, 2007.

Brenner, Neil, Jamie Peck, and Nik Theodore. “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.” Global Networks 10, no. 2 (April 2010): 182–222.

Brenner, Neil, and Christian Schmid. “Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?” City 19, no. 2–3 (May 4, 2015): 151–82.

Byrne, D. R. “Archaeology and the Fortress of Rationality.” In Cosmopolitan Archaeologies, edited by L. Meskell, 68–88, 2009.

Chang, Jiat-Hwee. A Genealogy of Tropical Architecture: Colonial Networks, Nature and Technoscience. London: Routledge, 2016.

Cupers, Kenny, Federica Zambeletti, and Laura Nkula-Wenz. “South Designs for Planetary Futures.” Accessed June 13, 2024. https://www.koozarch.com/interviews/south-designs-for-planetary-futures.

Davison, Graeme. “The City as a Natural System.” In The Pursuit of Urban History, edited by Derek Fraser and Anthony Sutcliffe. London: Edward Arnold, 1983.

Descola, Philippe. Beyond Nature and Culture. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.

Destro, Anna Maria. “Cosmology and Mythology.” In 21st Century Anthropology: A Reference Handbook, edited by H. James Birx, 227–34. London: Sage, 2010.

Douglas, Mary. How Institutions Think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1986.

Durkheim, Émile, and Marcel Mauss. Primitive Classification. 1963. Reprint, London: Taylor and Francis, 2009.

Dutta, Arindam. The Bureaucracy of Beauty: Design in the Age of Its Global Reproducibility. New York: Routledge, 2007.

Eliade, Mircea. Myths, Rites, Symbols: A Mircea Eliade Reader. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.

Giedion, Siegfried. Mechanization Takes Command: A Contribution to Anonymous History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1948.

Giedion, Sigfried. Bauen in Frankreich, Bauen in Eisen, Bauen in Eisenbeton. 1928. Reprint, Berlin: Gebr. Mann, 2000.

Glacken, Clarence J. Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.

Gorny, Robert. A, and Andrej Radman, eds. “The Epiphylogenetic Turn and Architecture: In (Tertiary) Memory of Stiegler.” Footprint 30 (July 12, 2022).

Hamilton, Clive. Defiant Earth: The Fate of Humans in the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Polity, 2017.

Hamlin, Christopher. “The City as a Chemical System? The Chemist as Urban Environmental Professional in France and Britain, 1780—1880.” Journal of Urban History 33, no. 5 (July 2007): 702–28.

Herzfeld, Michael. “Shaping Cultural Space: Reflections on the Politics and Cosmology of Urbanism.” In Life among Urban Planners: Practice, Professionalism, and Expertise in the Making of the City, edited by Jennifer Mack and Michael Herzfeld. The City in the Twenty-First Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020.

Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Howell, Signe. “Cosmology.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, edited by Alan Barnard and Jonathan Spencer, 196–99. London: Routledge, 2010.

Hui, Yuk. “Cosmotechnics as Cosmopolitics.” E-Flux, no. 86 (November 2017). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/86/161887/cosmotechnics-as-cosmopolitics/.

———. “For a Planetary Thinking.” E-Flux, December 2020. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/114/366703/for-a-planetary-thinking/.

———. “On Cosmotechnics: For a Renewed Relation between Technology and Nature in the Anthropocene.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21, no. 2 (2017): 319–41.

———. The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics. Falmouth: Urbanomic, 2016.

Jacobs, Alan. “From Tech Critique to Ways of Living.” The New Atlantis, Winter 2021. https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/from-tech-critique-to-ways-of-living.

Jewson, N. D. “The Disappearance of the Sick-Man from Medical Cosmology, 1770-1870.” Sociology 10, no. 2 (May 1976): 225–44.

Kousoulas, Stavros. Architectural Technicities: A Foray into Larval Space. London: Routledge, 2023.

Kragh, Helge. Conceptions of Cosmos: From Myths to the Accelerating Universe: A History of Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Kusch, Rodolfo. Indigenous and Popular Thinking in América. Translated by Maria Lugones and Joshua M. Price. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Tristes Tropiques. Translated by John Weightman and Doreen Weightman. Modern Classics. London: Penguin Books, 2011.

Mertins, Detlef. “Walter Benjamin and the Tectonic Unconscious: Using Architecture as an Optical Instrument.” In The Optic of Walter Benjamin, edited by Alex Coles, 196–221. London: Black Dog Publishing, 1999.

Mignolo, Walter, and Catherine E. Walsh. On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Durham: Duke University Press, 2018.

Mumford, Lewis. Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1934.

———. The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1970.

Perera, Dulmini, and Stavros Kousoulas, eds. “All Is in Formation: Architecture, Cybernetics, Ecology.” Footprint 28 (June 29, 2021).

Pérez-Gómez, Alberto. Architecture and the Crisis of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.

Pickering, Andrew. “The Ontological Turn: Taking Different Worlds Seriously.” Social Analysis 61, no. 2 (January 1, 2017).

Portella, Vinícius. “Cosmotechnics and the Multicultural Trap.” TripleAmpersand Journal (&&&), November 21, 2022. https://tripleampersand.org/cosmotechnics-and-the-multicultural-trap/.

Robinson, Jennifer. Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. Questioning Cities. London: Routledge, 2006.

Roy, Ananya. “Worlding the South: Towards a Post-Colonial Urban Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, edited by Susan Parnell and Sophie Oldfield, 9–20. London: Routledge, 2014.

Rykwert, Joseph. The Idea of a Town: The Anthropology of Urban Form in Rome, Italy and the Ancient World. 1964. Reprint, London: Faber and Faber, 2010.

Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.

Schabert, Tilo. “The Cosmology of the Architecture of Cities.” Diogenes 39, no. 156 (December 1991): 1–31.

Sheppard, Eric, Helga Leitner, and Anant Maringanti. “Provincializing Global Urbanism: A Manifesto.” Urban Geography 34, no. 7 (November 2013): 893–900.

Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja. “The Galactic Polity in Southeast Asia.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3, no. 3 (December 2013): 503–34.

Tresch, John. “Cosmogram.” In Cosmograms, edited by Mélik Ohanian and Jean-Christophe Royoux. New York: Lukas & Sternberg, 2005.

———. “Technological World‐Pictures: Cosmic Things and Cosmograms.” Isis 98, no. 1 (March 2007): 84–99.

Viveiros De Castro, Eduardo. “Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4, no. 3 (September 1998): 469–88.

Viveiros De Castro, Eduardo, and Yuk Hui. “For a Strategic Primitivism: A Dialogue between Eduardo Viveiros de Castro and Yuk Hui.” Philosophy Today 65, no. 2 (2021): 391–400.

Wallenstein, Sven-Olov. “Space, Power, Control.” SITE, 2021. https://www.sitezones.net/articles/spacepowercontrol.

Wright, A.F. “The Cosmology of the Chinese City.” In The City in Late Imperial China, edited by G. William Skinner and Hugh D. R. Baker, 33–75. Studies in Chinese Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1977.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-10