Science for Architecture: Designing Architectural Research in Post-War Sweden

Authors

  • Frida Rosenberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.6.1-2.752

Abstract

How did architectural research in Sweden become scientific in its approach rather than artistic, as architecture education in the post-war period was primarily influenced by the Bauhaus pedagogy?
Via the American Bauhaus pedagogical developments taking place at the IIT and the GSD, Swedish architecture education adopted the artistic ‘learning by doing’ approach.

The most interesting structure signifying this was a permanent exhibition of building materials located in the foreground of the 1957 KTH architecture school. When the new KTH architecture school was completed its architecture illustrated another image: that of the new architecture curriculum, A68, put into practice the same year as the building was designed. 
A68 reorganized architecture education and put more focus on environmental studies and building function analysis.

The new curriculum included the subjects Formlära, Design Principles, and Byggnadsfunktionslära, Building Function Analysis, which were technical in their approach of using empirical research. As a result, the 1969 KTH architecture building included a laboratory for testing technical problems in air-conditioned spaces as well as a laboratory for testing acoustics. The 1961 LTH architecture building included a full-scale-laboratory where studies were directed by Carin Boalt, the first female professor at a technical university.

Author Biography

Frida Rosenberg

Frida Rosenberg is a practicing architect, educator and researcher. She is a PhD Candidate in Architecture History and Theory at the Royal Institute of Technology and a frequent guest critic at Lund University. She received her architecture degree in 2004 from Chalmers and Yale University in 2007.

Downloads

Published

2012-01-01