On the Open Style of Architectural Reasoning
This article departs from Ian Hacking’s concept of ‘styles of reasoning’ to argue that open architecture is not necessarily an ontological, but rather a methodological category, and that in order to understand open architecture we require an appropriate style of architectural reasoning. Stanford Anderson’s approach to Imre Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programmes in architecture is used to develop the idea that a precise style of reasoning forms an explicit understanding of architectural openness, and is elaborated further using Michael Hays’s notion of critical architecture as an alternative approach to open architecture, which is free from any predetermined logic. The article concludes with an attempt to identify similarities between the work of Anderson and Hays as a basis for an open style of architectural reasoning.
Anderson, Stanford. ‘Architectural design as a system of research programmes’, Design Studies, ed. K. Michael Hays (1984):146-50.
Anderson, Stanford. ‘Architectural research programmes in the work of Le Corbusier’, Design Studies, ed. K. Michael Hays (1984): 151-58.
Anderson, Stanford. ‘Introduction’, in Planning for Diversity and Choice, ed. Stanford Anderson (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1968), 3-7.
Anderson, Stanford. ‘Rational reconstructions and architectural knowledge’, Architecture in the Age of Empire (2011):163-75.
Crombie, A.C. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition: The history of argument and explanation especially in the mathematical and biomedical sciences and arts (Vol. 3). (London: Duckworth, 1994).
Davidson, Arnold. ‘Styles of Reasoning: From the History of Art to the Epistemology of Science’, The emergence of sexuality: historical epistemology and the formation of concepts. (Boston: Harvard University Press, 2001), 125-41.
Feyerabend, Paul. ‘Outline of a Pluralistic Theory of Knowledge and Action’ in Planning for Diversity and Choice, ed. Stanford Anderson (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1968), 275-84
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things, (London & New York: Routledge, 2005).
Foucault, Michel. ‘Truth and Power’, in Power/Knowledge, ed. Colin Gordon (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980), 109-133.
Frampton, Kenneth. Modern Architecture. (London: Thames & Hudson, 1996).
Goodman, Nelson. ‘The Status of Style’, Critical Inquiry 1, no.4 (June 1975): 799-811.
Hacking, Ian. ‘Foucault’s Immature Science’, Nous 13, no. 1 (1979): 39-51.
Hacking, Ian. ‘Imre Lakatos’s Philosophy of Science’, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science 30, (1979): 381-410.
Hacking, Ian. ‘Language, Truth and Reason 30 years later’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43 (2012): 599–609.
Hacking, Ian. Representing & Intervening. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
Hacking, Ian. ‘‘Style’ for historians and philosophers’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23 (1992): 1-20.
Hays, K. Michael. ‘Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form’, Perspecta 21, (1984): 14-29.
Lakatos, Imre. The methodology of scientific research programmes, Philosophical papers I, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Landau, Royston. ‘The history of modern architecture that still needs to be written’, AA Files 21 (1991): 49-54.
Mejía Hernández, Jorge. Transactions; or Architecture as a System of Research Programs, (TU DELFT, 2018), https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:8e4e1df7-716b-40d8-bb38-3fd9f03bdda4
Popper, Karl. ‘Epistemology without a knowing subject’, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 52, (1968): 333-73.
Sauerländer, Willibald. ‘From Stilus to Style: Reflections on the Fate of a Notion’, Art History 6, no. 3 (September 1983): 253-70.
Sonntag, Richard, Claus Borgnakke and Gordon J. Van Wylen. Fundamentals of Thermodynamics (New York: Wiley, 2003).
Williams, Bernard. Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).
Wölfflin, Heinrich. Principles of Art History: The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art (New York: Dover Publications, 1950).
Copyright (c) 2023 Konstantinos Apostolidis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.