The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?
The French case in the light of European Experiences
The architecture competition is a high point of interaction between very diverse actors, architecture specialists or not. However, is it really an opportunity for exchange and shared learning? Based on surveys conducted in France and in several European countries on behalf of the French Ministry of Culture, this contribution aims to identify the conditions that foster the interactions inherent to competitions, the possible scope of these exchanges and the rationale behind them. When the competition is a chosen procedure, it is most often perceived as a moment of generating ideas that opens a professional debate and also addresses the general public. When it is mandatory, the competition is guided by another logic: that of ensuring the fairness and transparency of the joint choice of a project and a service provider as well as the legality of the contract concluded with the latter. Depending on the place given by decision-makers to this legal and contractual dimension, the nature and scope of the debates around the competition vary widely. If the legalistic approach dominates, it tends to limit interactions. However if the contracting authority adopts a more open approach to the competition, from programming to the dissemination and capitalisation of its results, it can make a real process of collective deliberation and favour the growth of shared competence.
Jonas E. Andersson, Gerd Bloxham Zettersten and Magnus Rönn, Architectural Competitions; Histories and Practice. Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology and Rio KulturKooperativ: 2013.
Bacqué, Marie-Hélène, Henri Rey, and Yves Sintomer, Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative: les nouveaux paradigmes de l’action publique. Paris: La Découverte, 2005.
Chupin, Jean-Pierre, Carmela Cucuzzella and Bechara Helal Eds. Architecture Competitions and The Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge: An International Inquiry. Montreal: Potential Architecture Books, 2015.
Chupin, Jean-Pierre Chupin, Carmen Cucuzzella. "Environmental standards and judgment processes in competitions for public buildings," Geographica Helvetica, Swiss Journal of Geography (1, 2011)13-23.
Daniel-Lacombem Éric, Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger, "Vers des dynamiques de coproduction et une hybridation des savoirs dans les projets d'urbanisme? Évaluation réflexive d'un dispositif d'Assistance à Maîtrise d'Ouvrage," Savoirs citoyens et démocratie participative dans la question urbaine, Eds Agnès Deboulet, Héloïse Nez, 51 - 61: Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2013.
Épron, Jean-Pierre. Architecture: une Anthologie. Paris : Pierre Mardaga, 1991.
Findeli, Alain. "La recherche-projet en design et la question de la question de recherche : essai de clarification conceptuelle," Sciences du Design (1, 2015), 45-57.
Frey, Pierre A., and Ivan Kolecek. Concours d’architecture et d’urbanisme en Suisse romande. Lausanne: Payot, 1995.
Gravari-Barbas, Maria and Cécile Renard-Delautre. Starchitecture(s): Figures d'architectes et espace urbain-Celebrity Architects and Urban Space. Paris: Editions L'Harmattan, 2015.
Goodin, Robert E. Innovating Democracy: Democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Jones, John C. Design Methods: Seeds of human Futures. London: Wiley, 1970.
Kreiner, Kristian. "Architectural Competitions ; Empirical Observations and Strategic Implications for Architectural Firms," Nordic Journal of Architectural Research (Vol. 21, 2/3, 2009) 37-51.
Lipstadt, Helene Lipstadt and Barry Bergdoll, editors. The Experimental tradition: essays on competitions in architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1989.
Macaire, Elise and Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger. "Dix ans de pratiques des concours d'architecture en France : bilan et perspectives," in Les Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale et Urbaine, [En ligne], Actualités de la recherche, mis en ligne le 01 juillet 2019, https://journals.openedition.org/craup/1923.
Obkircher, Stefan. Raumentwicklung in Grenzregionen. Bedeutung und Wirkung von Planungsleitbildern und Governance-Prozessen. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2017.
Prechter, Günther. Architektur als soziale Praxis. Akteure zeitgenössischer Baukulturen: Das Beispiel Vorarlberg. Vienna, Cologne, Weimar: Böhlau Verlag, 2013.
Sanoff, Henry. Integrating Programming, Evaluation and Participation in Design: a theory Z Approach. Brookfield, Vermont : Avebury, 1992.
Schmiedeknecht, Torsten. "Routine and Exceptional Competition Practice in Germany as published in Wettbewerbe Aktuell," Nordic Journal of Architectural Research (Vol. 21, 2/3, 2009) 151-165
Seraji, Nasrine. "France," in G. Stanley Collyer, editor. Competing Globally in Architecture Competitions. London: Academy Press: 2004.
Spreiregen, Paul D. Design competitions. New-York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Stang Valand, Marianne. "End user participation as an input to shape the brief in architectural competitions; a threefold translation process," Nordic Journal of Architectural Research (Vol. 21, 2/3, 2009) 108-122
Strebel, Ignaz and Jan Silberberger, eds. Architecture Competition: Project Design and the Building Process. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2018.
Till, Jeremy Till. "Competitive Strain Syndrome" in The Competition Grid, ed. Maria Theodorou and Antigoni Katsakou, 161 - 168. Newcastle: RIBA Publishing, 2018.
Vanderburgh, David and Carlo Menon, "Who or What Wins an Architectural Competition ?” FORMAkademisk (Vol. 7, 1, 2014) 1-19
Volker, Leentje. Deciding about Design Quality: Value Judgements and Decision Making in the Selection of Architects by Public Clients under European Tendering Regulations. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 2010.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.