The Diagrammatic Inquiry of Architectural Media
According to the philosopher C.S. Peirce the diagram is a system of interrelated parts that operates in a manner similar to another system of interrelated parts. It is a mental map of relations. It drives an open-ended inquiry on a given problem. In architectural discourse a diagram is often defined as a particular form of drawing. It is a simplified image and/or it uses a notation system. In this context, the latter is termed a digital diagram. However, an architectural medium has material properties that influence both the making and the translation of the drawing. It is both a singular artefact and a set of instructions for actions undertaken in another space than that of the medium. This article introduces the notion of an immanent diagram to discuss how the composition of a drawing is distributed. The proposition is that the architectural diagrammatic inquiry operates in the struggle between digital and analogue diagrams. I develop the argument using a traditional architectural drawing as a starting point. In the last section, I discuss a contemporary computer based design practice in which drawings and prototype modelling constitute a heterogeneous technological environment.
Agamben, Giorgio. ‘Absolute Immanence.’ In Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy edited by Daniel Heller-Roazen, 220-239. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1999.
Allen, Stan. Practice: Architecture, Technique and Representation. Amsterdam: G+B International, 2000.
Ayres, Phil. ‘Introduction: Persistent Modelling – Reconsidering Relations.’ In Persistent Modelling. Extending the Role of Architectural Representation, 1-3. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, 2012.
Busk, Malene. ‘The Diagrams of Peirce and Deleuze.’ In Cartography, Morphology, Topology edited by Cort Ross Dinesen, 170-173. København: Kunstakademiets Arkitektskoles Forlag, 2009.
Delanda, Manuel. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
Deleuze, Gilles. Bergsonism. New York: Zone Books, 1988.
Deleuze, Gilles. Francis Bacon. The Logic of Sensation. London: Continuum, 2004.
Goodman, Nelson. The Languages of Art. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett publishing Company, INC., 1976.
Massumi, Brian, ‘”Technical Mentality” Revisited: Brian Massumi on Gilbert Simondon.’ In Being and Technology edited by Arne De Boever, Alex Murray, Jon Roffe and Ashley Woodward, 19-36. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.
Merrill, Michael. Louis Kahn – Drawing to Find Out: The Dominican Motherhouse and the Patient Search for Architecture. Baden: Lars Müller Publishers, 2010.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. ‘The First Rule of Logic.’ In The Essential Peirce edited by The Peirce Edition Project, 42-56. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1998.
Simondon, Gilbert. ‘Technical Mentality.’ In Being and Technology edited by Arne De Boever, Alex Murray, Jon Roffe and Ashley Woodward, 1-15. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.
Stjernfeldt, Frederik. Diagrammatology: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology and Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.
Vidler, Anthony. ‘What Is a Diagram Anyway?.’ In Feints edited by Silvio Cassarà, 19-27. Milano: Skira Editore, 2006.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.