HyperCell: A Bio-inspired Design Framework for Real-time Interactive Architectures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2018.1.1947Keywords:
hyperbody, hypercell, Computation, Embodiment, Biology, Architecture, Organic Architecture, tu delft, ArchigramAbstract
This pioneering research focuses on Biomimetic Interactive Architecture using “Computation”, “Embodiment”, and “Biology” to generate an intimate embodied convergence to propose a novel rule-based design framework for creating organic architectures composed of swarm-based intelligent components. Furthermore, the research boldly claims that Interactive Architecture should emerge as the next truly Organic Architecture. As the world and society are dynamically changing, especially in this digital era, the research dares to challenge the Utilitas, Firmitas, and Venustas of the traditional architectural Weltanschauung, and rejects them by adopting the novel notion that architecture should be dynamic, fluid, and interactive. This project reflects a trajectory from the 1960’s with the advent of the avant-garde architectural design group, Archigram, and its numerous intriguing and pioneering visionary projects. Archigram’s non-standard, mobile, and interactive projects profoundly influenced a new generation of architects to explore the connection between technology and their architectural projects. This research continues this trend of exploring novel design thinking and the framework of Interactive Architecture by discovering the interrelationship amongst three major topics: “Computation”, “Embodiment”, and “Biology”. The project aims to elucidate pioneering research combining these three topics in one discourse: “Bio-inspired digital architectural design”. These three major topics will be introduced in this Summary.
“Computation”, is any type of calculation that includes both arithmetical and nonarithmetical steps and follows a well-defined model understood and described as, for example, an algorithm. But, in this research, refers to the use of data storage, parametric design application, and physical computing for developing informed architectural designs. “Form” has always been the most critical focus in architectural design, and this focus has also been a major driver behind the application computational design in Architecture. Nonetheless, this research will interpret the term “Form” in architecture as a continual “information processor” rather than the result of information processing. In other words, “Form” should not be perceived only as an expressive appearance based computational outcome but rather as a real-time process of information processing, akin to organic “Formation”. Architecture embodying kinetic ability for adjusting or changing its shape with the ability to process the surroundings and feedback in accordance with its free will with an inherent interactive intelligent movement of a living body. Additionally, it is also crucial to address the question of whether computational technologies are being properly harnessed, if they are only used for form-generating purposes in architecture design, or should this be replaced with real-time information communication and control systems to produce interactive architectures, with embodied computation abilities?
“Embodiment” in the context of this research is embedded in Umberto Eco’s vision on Semiotics, theories underlying media studies in Marshall McLuhan’s “Body Extension” (McLuhan, 1964), the contemporary philosophical thought of “Body Without Organs” (Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, 1983), the computational Logic of ‘Swarm Behavior’ and the philosophical notion of “Monadology” proposed by Gottfried Leibniz (Leibniz, 1714). Embodied computation and design are predominant today within the wearable computing and smart living domains, which combine Virtual and Real worlds. Technical progress and prowess in VR development also contribute to advancing 3D smart architectural design and display solutions. The proposed ‘Organic body-like architectural spaces’ emphasize upon the realization of a body-like interactive space. Developing Interactive Architecture will imply eliciting the collective intelligence prevalent in nature and the virtual world of Big Data. Interactive Architecture shall thus embody integrated Information exchange protocols and decision-making systems in order to possess organic body-like qualities.
“Biology”, in this research explores biomimetic principles intended to create purposedriven kinetic and organic architecture. This involves a detailed study/critique of organic architecture, generating organic shapes, performance optimization based digital fabrication techniques and kinetic systems. A holistic bio-inspired architecture embodies multiple performance criteria akin to natural systems, which integrate structural, infrastructure performances throughout the growth of an organic body. Such a natural morphogenesis process of architectural design explores what Janine M. Benyus described as “learning the natural process”. Profoundly influenced by the processes behind morphogenesis, the research further explores Evolutionary Development Biology (Evo-Devo) explaining how embryological regulation strongly affect the resulting formations. Evo-Devo in interactive architecture implies the development of architecture based on three fundamental principles: “Simple to Complex”, “Geometric Information Distribution”, and “On/Off Switch and Trigger.”
The research seeks to create a relatively intelligent architectural body, and the tactile interactive spatial environment by applying the extracted knowledge from the study of the aforementioned principles of Evo-Devo in the following fashion:
- A. Extract a Self-Similar Componential System based approach from the “Simple to Complex” principle of Evo-Devo
- B. Extract the idea of “Collective Intelligence” from “Geometric information Distribution” principle of Evo-Devo
- C. Extract the principle of “Assembly Regulation” from “On/Off switch and trigger” principle of Evo-Devo
The “HyperCell” research, through an elaborate investigation on the three aforementioned topics, develops a design framework for developing real-time adaptive spatial systems. HyperCell does this, by developing a system of transformable cubic elements which can self-organize, adapt and interact in real-time. These Hypercells shall comprise an organic space which can adjust itself in relation to our human bodies. The furniture system is literally reified and embodied to develop an intra-active space that proactively provokes human movement. The space thus acquires an emotive dimension and can become your pet, partner, or even friend, and might also involve multiple usabilities of the same space. The research and its progression were also had actively connected with a 5-year collaborative European Culture project: “MetaBody”.
The research thus involves exploration of Interactive Architecture from the following perspectives: architectural design, digital architectural history trajectory, computational technology, philosophical discourse related to the embodiment, media and digital culture, current VR and body-related technology, and Evolutionary Developmental Biology. “HyperCell” will encourage young architects to pursue interdisciplinary design initiatives via the fusion of computational design, embodiment, and biology for developing bio-inspired organic architectures.
References
Addington, Michelle & Schodek, Daniel. (2005). Smart Materials and New Technologies: for the architecture and design professions. Oxford: Architectural Press: An imprint of Elsevier.
Anders, P. (2001). Extending Architecture throgh Electronic Media. In C. Speed, & G. Grinsted (Eds.), VO1D (pp.58-65).
Andrasek, A. (2012). Open Synthesis// Toward a Resilient Fabric of Architecture. Log, 25, 45-54.
Barthes, R. (1968). The Death of the Author. In S. Heath (Ed.), Image, Music, Text (S. Heath, Trans., pp. 142-148). London: Fontana Press.
Beesley, P. (2013). Architecture in Formation: On the Nature of Information in Digital Architecture. In P. Lorenzo-Eiroa, & A. Sprecher (Eds.), Architecture in Formation: On the Nature of Information in Digital Architecture (pp. 268-275). New York: Routledge.
Benedikt, M. (1991). Cyberspace: the First Steps. Cambridge: The MIT Pressed.
Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
Biloria, Nimish & Chang, Jia-Rey. (2013). Hyper-Morphology: Experimentations with bio-inspired design processes for adaptive spatial re-use. Proceedings of the eCAADe Conference Volume No.1, 2013 (TU Delft) (pp. 529-538). Delft: eCAADe and Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology.
Brayer, Marie-Ange. (2013). Natur and artifice: Affects and artifacts in naturalized architecture. In M.-A. &. Brayer, Naturalizing Architecture (pp. 14-37). Orléans: Edition HYX.
Cache, B. (2012). Instruments of Thought: Another Classical Tradition. In C. O’Donnell (Ed.), The Cornell Journal of Architecture 9: Mathematics (pp. 17-26). New York: College of Architecture, Art, and Planning, Cornell University.
Carpo, M. (2012). Twenty Years of Digital Design. In M. Carpo (Ed.), The Digital Turn in Architecture 1992 – 2012 (pp. 8-14). New York: Wiley.
Carroll, S. B. (2005). Endless Forms Most Beautiful: the New Science of Evo Devo. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Chang, Jia-Rey, Biloria, Nimish, & Vandoren, Dieter. (2015). Ambiguous Topology from Interactive to Pro-active Spatial Environments. Proceedings of the IEEE VISAP’15 Conference: Data Improvisation (pp. 7-13). Chicago: IEEE VISAP.
Cicognani, A. (1998). On the Linguistic Nature of Cyberspace and Virtual Communities. Virtual Reality Society, 3(1), 25-33.
Crompton, D., & Archigram (Group). (2012). A Guide to Archigram 1961 - 74. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Cruz, M. (2008). Synthetic Neoplasms. Architectural Design: Neoplasmatic Design, 78(6), 36-43.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: J. Murray.
DeLanda, M. (2002). Deleuze and the Use of the Genetic Algorithm in Architecture. In N. Leach (Ed.), Designing for a Digital World. New York: Wiley-Academic.
de Kerckhove, D. (2001). The Architecture of Intelligence. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Deleuze, G. (1988). Bergsonism. New York: Zone Books.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2003). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Londom: Continuum.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
Dürer, Albrecht & Formschneider, H. Andreas (Nürnberg). (1525). Underweysung der Messung . Germany: Nürnberg.
Emmer, M. (2004). Mathland From Flatland to Hypersurfaces. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Engelbart, D. (1962). Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. Washington DC: Stanford Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.dougengelbart.org/pubs/papers/scanned/Doug_Engelbart-AugmentingHumanIntellect.pdf
Fox, Michael, & Kemp, Miles. (2009). Interactive Architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Frazer, J. (1995). A Natural Model for Architecture/ The Nature of the Evolutionary Mode. In J. Frazer, An Evolutionary Architecture. London: Architectural Association.
Future System. (1996). For Inspiration Only. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Future System. (1999). More for Inspiration Only. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gibson, W. (1982, July). Burning Chrome. Omni, 4(10), pp. 72-77.
Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.
Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., & D’Andea, R. (2014). Flight Assembled Architecture. In M.-A. &. Brayer, Naturalizing Architecture (pp. 136-137). Orléans: Edition HYX.
Haeckel, E. (1998). Art Forms in Nature: The Prints of Ernst Haeckel . Munich: Prestel.
Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Imperiale, A. (2000). New Flatness: Surface Tension in Digital Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Kelly, K. (1995). Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, & the Economic World. New York: Basic Books.
Kretzer, M. (2014). Beyond Performance. In M. Kretzer, & L. Hovestadt (Eds.), ALIVE: Advancements in Adaptive Architecture (pp. 72-77). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Latour, B., & Yaneva, A. (2008). Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All the Buildings Move: An Ant’s View of Architecture. In R. Geister (Ed.), Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research (pp. 80-89). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Leibniz, G. W. (1714). Monadology. (J. Bennett, Trans.) Retrieved from http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/leibniz1714b.pdf
Lévy, P. (1998). Becoming Virtual: Reality in the Digital Age. (R. Bononno, Trans.) New York: Plenum Trade.
Lorenzo-Eiroa, P. (2013). Form:In:Form on the relationship between Digital Signifiers and Formal Autonomy. In P. Lorenzo-Eiroa, & A. Sprecher (Eds.), Architecture in Formation: On the Nature of Information in Digital Architecture (pp. 11-22). New York: Routledge.
Lorenzo-Eiroa, P., & Lynn, G. (2013). Interview and projects by Greg Lynn FORM. In P. Lorenzo-Eiroa , & A. Sprecher (Eds.), Architecture in Formation: On the Nature of Information in Digital Architecture (pp. 286-295). New York: Routledge.
Lynn, G. (1999). Animate Form. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
McLuhan, M. (1964). The Gadget Lover: Narcissus as Narcosis. In M. McLuhan, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (pp. 45-52). New York: McGraw-Hill.
McCullough, M. (2006). 20 years of scripted space. (M. Silver, Ed.) Architectural Design Special Issue: Programming Cultures, 76(4), 12-15.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McLuhan, M., Fiore, Q., & Agel, J. (1967). The medium is the massage. New York: Bantam Books.
Menges, A. (2013). Morphospaces of Robotic Fabrication. In S. n. Brell-Çokca, & J. Braumann (Eds.), Rob | Arch 2012: Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art, and Design (pp. 28-47). Berlin: Springer.
Menges, A., Reichert, S., & Krieg O. D. (2014). Meteorosensitive Architecture. In K. M., & L. Hovestadt (Eds.), ALIVE: Advancements in Adaptive Architecture (pp. 39-42). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Miller, J. H. (2002). Literature and Virtual Realities. In J. H. Miller, On Literature (pp. 24-45). New York: Routledge.
Mitchell, W. J. (1990). A New Agenda for Computer-Aided Design. In M. McCullough, W. J. Mitchell, & P. Purcell (Eds.), The Electronic Design Studio: Architectural Education in the Computer Era (pp. 1-16). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Negroponte, N. (1975). Soft Architecture Machine. In Computer Aided Participatory Design (pp. 102-123). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Novak, M. (1991). Liquid Architectures in Cyberspace. In M. Benedikt, Cyberspace: First Step (pp. 225-255). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Oosterhuis, K. (2003). HyperBodies: Towards an E-motive Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Oosterhuis, K. (2006). Swarm Architecture II. In K. Oosterhuis, & L. Feireiss (Eds.), The Architecture Co-Laboratory: Game Set and Match II, on Computer Games, Advanced Geometries, and Digital Technologies (pp. 14-28). Rotterdam: episode publisher.
Oosterhuis, K. (2011). Towards a New Kind of Building. Rotterdam: NAi Publisher.
O’Sullivan, Dan & Igoe, Tom. (2004). Physical Computing: Sensing and Controlling the Physical World with Computers. Boston: Course Technology Press.
Oxman, Neri, Firstenberg, Michal, & Tsai, Elizabeth,. (2012). Digital Anisotropy: A Variable Elasticity Rapid Prototyping Platform. Virtual and Physical Prototyping (VPP), 261-274.
Pask, G. (1969). The Architecture Relevance of Cybernetics. Architectural Design, 494-496.
Palumbo, L. M. (2000). New Wombs: Electronic Bodies and Architectural Disorders. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Playboy Interview: Marshall McLuhan. (1969, March). Playboy, pp. 26–27, 45, 55-56, 61, 63.
Price, C. (2002). Generator Project. In Cyber_Reader: Critical Writings for the Digital Era (pp. 86-89). London: Phaidon Press Limited.
Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Compute Graphics, 21(4), 25-34.
Reynolds, C. W. (1999). Steering Behaviors For Autonomous Characters. Proceedings of Game Developers Conference (pp. 763-782). San Francisco: Miller Freeman Game Group.
Snooks, R. (2013). Self-Organised Bodies. In Lorenzo-Eiroa P., & A. Sprecher (Eds.), Architecture in Formation: On the Nature of Information in Digital Architecture (pp. 264-267). New York: Routledge.
Spiller, Neil & Amstrong, Rachel. (2011). It’s A Brand New Morning. Architectural Design: Protocell Architecture, 81(2), 14-25.
Stelarc. (1995). Towards the Post-Human: From Psycho-body to Cyber-system. Architectural Design, 65(11/12), 90-96.
Sutherland, I. E. (1963). Sketchpad: A Man-machine Graphical Communication System. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Terzidis, K. (2006). Algorithmic Form. Oxford: Routledge.
Thompson, D. (1992). On Growth of Form. London: Cambridge University Press.
van Schalk, M., & Macel, O. (Eds.). (2005). Exit Utopia: Architectural Provocations, 1956-76. London: Prestel Publishing.
Wertheim, M. (1999). The Pearl Gate of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet. London: Virago.
Weinstock, M. (2004). Morphogenesis and Mathematics of Emergence. In M. Hensel, A. Menges, & M. Weinstock (Eds.), Architectural Design, Emergence: Morphogenetic Design Strategies, Volume 74, Issue 3 (Vol. 74, pp.10-17). New York: Wiley.
Weinstock, M. (2010). The Architecture of Emergence: The Evolution of Form in Nature and Cilvilisation. New York: Wiley.
Weisberg, D. E. (2008). The Engineering Design Revolution: The People, Companies and Computer Systems That Changed Forever the Practice of Engineering. Retrieved from www.cadhistory.net
Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Champaign: Wolfram Media. Retrieved from http://www.wolframscience.com/nksonline/toc.html
Young, M. (2012). Digital Remediation. (C. O’Donnell, Ed.) The Cornell Journal of Architecture 9: Mathematics, 119-134.
