Finnish standardization panel pilot study: Preliminary observations and a research agenda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/jos.2026.8341Keywords:
standardization ecosystem, national standardization system, small open economy, FinlandAbstract
Standardization ecosystems are arguably inseparable components of innovation ecosystems and national innovation systems. The design of standardization institutions may impact innovation incentives, appropriation of research and development investments and the rate and direction of technological progress. We evaluate the status of the Finnish standardization ecosystem and the role of standardization for the stakeholders of the Finnish standardization ecosystem. Extensive stakeholder interviews provided diverse perspectives of which the following saturated observations can be highlighted. First, the role and impacts of standards vary across industries, so the perspectives on the functioning of standardization systems vary accordingly. Second, standardization education is not systematic in Finland, indicating that standardization education could be improved to complement the learning by doing approach in organizations. Third, the role of standardization is expected to increase in the future, but geopolitical tensions cast a shadow on the functioning of the system. The pilot study provides one benchmark for the analysis of national standardization ecosystems in other (European) small open economies. We conclude by presenting a research agenda.
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1A. (pp. 385–472). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business.
Ali-Vehmas, T. (2016). Complex Network Perspective on Collaboration in the ICT Standardization. International Journal of Standardization Research, 14(2), 33-64. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSR.2016070103
Baldwin, C. Y., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Kapoor, R., & West, J. (2024). Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies. Research Policy, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104949
Baron, J. (2020). Counting standard contributions to measure the value of patent portfolios: A tale of apples and oranges. Telecommunications Policy, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101870
Baron, J., & Kanevskaia, O. (2023). Wearing multiple hats—the role of working group chairs’ affiliation in standards development. Research Policy 52(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104822
Baron, J., & Spulber, D. (2018). Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 27, 462–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12257
Baron, J., Arque-Castells, P., Leonard, A., Pohlmann, T., & Sergheraert, E. (2023). Empirical Assessment of Potential Challenges in SEP Licensing. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2873/19262
Bekkers, R., Catalini, C., Martinelli, A., Righi, C., & Simcoe, T. (2023). Disclosure rules and declared essential patents. Research Policy, 52(1), 104618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104618
Bekkers, R., Raiteri, E., Martinelli, A., Mas-Tur, E., & Thumm, N. (eds.). (2020). Landscape Study of Potentially Essential Patents Disclosed to ETSI. Thumm (ed.). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/313626
Blind, K. (2008). Regulatory foresight: methodologies and selected applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(4), 496-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.02.004
Blind, K. (2025). Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123873
Blind, K., & Jungmittag, A. (2008). The impact of patents and standards on macroeconomic growth: a panel approach covering four countries and 12 sectors. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 29(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-007-0060-8
Blind, K., Kromer, L., Neuhäusler, P., Rosenberg, D., & Schubert, T. (2024). European Standardisation Panel Survey. European Commission, DG for Research and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2777/643814
Blind, K., & Kromer, L. (2024). German Standardisation Panel: Standardisation Research, Policy and Promotion. Indicator Report 2024 - European Standardisation. https://www.normungspanel.de/publications/latest-results-of-the-dnp-published/?tmstv=1756730943
Blind, K., & Mangelsdorf, A. (2016). Motives to standardize: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 48–49, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.001
Blind, K., Ramel, F., & Rochell, C. (2021). The influence of standards and patents on long-term economic growth. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 979–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09864-3
Blind, K., & von Laer, M. (2021). Paving the path: drivers of standardization participation at ISO. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09871-4
Bonner, P., & Potter, D. (2000). Achieving best practices in national standardisation: a benchmarking study of the national standardisation systems of Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Italy. Kauppa- ja teollisuusministeriö, Edita. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:bib:me:W00253726500
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press.
Buggenhagen, M., & Blind, K. (2022). Development of 5G – identifying organizations active in publishing, patenting, and standardization. Telecommunications Policy, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102326
CEN-CENELEC. (2015). CEN-CENELEC Guide 30: European Guide on Standards and Regulation - Better regulation through the use of voluntary standards - Guidance for policy makers. CEN-CENELEC.
de Vries, H., Blind, K., Mangelsdorf, A., Verheul, H., & Van der Zwann, J. (2009). SME access to European Standardization – Enabling small and medium–sized enterprises to achieve greater benefit from standards and from involvement in standardization. Erasmus University.
de Vries, H. (1999). Standards for the Nation: Analysis of National Standards Organizations. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Draghi, M. (2024). The future of European competitiveness: A competitiveness strategy for Europe. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/draghi-report_en
European Commission. (2003). General Guidelines for the Cooperation between CEN, CENELEC and ETSI and the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association — 28 March 2003. Official Journal of the European Union, C91. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:091:0007:0011:en:PDF
European Commission. (2012). EU Regulation 1025/2012 on European Standardisation. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/1025/oj/eng
European Commission. (2020). Making the most of the EU’s innovative potential: An intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/43845/attachments/2/translations/en/renditions/native
European Commission. (2022). An EU Strategy on Standardisation: Setting global standards in support of a resilient, green and digital EU single market. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/48598/attachments/2/translations/en/renditions/native
European Commission. (2023). Impact assessment report accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on standard essential patents and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. European Commission.
Finnish Government. (2024). Multiannual plan for the use of government research and development funding. Publications of the Finnish Government 2024:41. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/11111/10974
Gabriel, L. C., de Vries, H., & Cleeland, B. (2022). Stimulating Education About Standardization - Activities and Perspectives of National Standards Bodies. Journal of Standardisation, 1. https://doi.org/10.18757/jos.2022.6298
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2019). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation 90–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Grillo, F., Wiegmann, P. M., de Vries, H. J., Bekkers, R., Tasselli, S., Yousefi, A., & van de Kaa, G. (2024). Standardization: Research trends, current debates, and interdisciplinarity. Academy of Management Annals, 18(2), 788-830, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2023.0072
Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki, N., Khalilova, A., & Cardoso, J. (2023). European Innovation Scoreboard 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/119961
Hall, B. H., & Helmers, C. (2019). The impact of international patent systems: evidence from accession to the European Patent Convention. Research Policy, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103810
Heikkilä, J. (2024). Finnish Standardization Panel Pilot: A Progress Report. Proceedings of the 28th EURAS Annual Standardisation Conference -Comprehensive Standardisation for Societal Challenges.
Heikkilä, J., Ali-Vehmas, T., & Rissanen, J. (2021). The Link Between Standardization and Economic Growth: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Standardization Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsr.287101
Heikkilä, J., & Ojanen, V. (2025). Standardization ecosystems, standardization strategies and transformative innovation policy. Business Finland Policy Brief 1/2025. https://www.businessfinland.fi/julkaisut/policy-brief-12025-standardization-ecosystems-standardization-strategies-and-transformative-innovation-policy
Heikkilä, J., & Peltoniemi, M. (2023). The changing work of IPR attorneys: 30 years of institutional transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122853
Heikkilä, J., Rinkinen, S., & Rantala, T. (2024). IPR and standardization strategies of companies in the presence of the Brussels effect. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4746781
Hemphill, T. A. (2009). National standards strategy: public/private cooperation for global competitiveness. Competitiveness Review, 19(4), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/10595420910977416
Juhasz, R., Lane, N., & Rodrik, D. (2024). The new economics of industrial policy. Annual Review of Economics, 16, 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081023-024638
Kallestrup, M. (2017). Stakeholder Participation in European Standardization: A Mapping and an Assessment of Three Categories of Regulation. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 44(4), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2017021
Kanevskaia, O., Delimatsis, P., & Bijlmakers, S. (2024). The European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI): in search for legitimacy and resilience of European standardisation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 37(5), 1269–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2395262
Kanevskaia O. (2025). Is it really all about the money? The future of European standardization after PublicResourceOrg. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 16(1), 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.64
Koyama, M., & Rubin, J. (2022). How the world became rich: The historical origins of economic growth. Polity Press.
Letta, E. (2024). Much More Than a Market - Speed, Security, Solidarity: Empowering the Single Market to deliver a sustainable future and prosperity for all EU Citizens. Institut Jacques Delors https://institutdelors.eu/en/publications/much-more-than-a-market/
Lucking, B., Bloom, N., & van Reenen, J. (2019). Have R&D spillovers declined in the 21st century? Fiscal Studies, 40, 561–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12195
Lundvall, B. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., Hajikhani, A., Naumanen, M., Nyman, J., & Laasonen, V. (2025). Mid-term evaluation of the Leading Company Initiative partnerships - Final Report. Business Finland. https://www.businessfinland.fi/julkaisut/mid-term-evaluation-of-the-leading-company-initiative-partnerships---final-report-32025
Marcovitch, I., & Wilner, A. (2024). Tackling the Geopolitics of Standardization: Lessons from Canada’s Strategic Foresight-to-Standards Pilot Project. International Journal, 79(4), 577-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020241298264
Menon Economics. (2018). The Influence of Standards on the Nordic Economies. Oslo: Menon Economics.
Moon, S., & Lee, H. (2021). The Primary Actors of Technology Standardization in the Manufacturing Industry. IEEE Access, 9, 101886-101901. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097800
Niemelä, I., & Jokinen, H. (2018). Standardisointi Suomessa. Loppuraportti.
Nylund, P., & Brem, A. (2023). Standardization in innovation ecosystems: The promise and peril of dominant platforms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122714
Parker, C., Scott, S. & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE Research Methods Foundations.
Rühlig, T. (2023). Chinese Influence through Technical Standardization Power. Journal of Contemporary China, 32(139), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2052439
Scaringella, L. & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023
Swann, P. (2010). The Economics of Standardization: An Update. Report for the UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, Innovative Economic Limited.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47, 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
Teubner, L., Henkel, J., & Bekkers, R. (2021). Industry consortia in mobile telecommunications standards setting: Purpose, organization and diversity. Telecommunications Policy, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102059
Vennerød, Ø, Skyum, L., Erraia, J. & Midtømme, K. (2023). Macroeconomic benefits of standardisation: Evidence from six Northern European countries. Menon Publication no. 43/2023.
Waguespack, D. M., & Fleming, L. (2008). Scanning the commons? Evidence on the benefits to startups participating in open standards development. Management Science, 55(2), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0944
Wakke, P., Blind, K., & De Vries, H. (2015). Driving factors for service providers to participate in standardisation: Insights from the Netherlands. Industry & Innovation, 22(4), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2015.1049865
Werle, R. & Iversen, E. (2006). Promoting legitimacy in technical standardization. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 2, 19–39.
Wiegmann, P. M., de Vries, H. & Blind, K. (2017). Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 46(8), 1370-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.002
Wiegmann, P., de Vries, H. & Eom, D. (2023). Measuring societal impact of standards. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
WIPO. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024 - Unlocking the Promise of Social Entrepreneurship. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2024/en/index.html
Yates, J. & Murphy. (2019). Engineering rules: Global Standards Setting Since 1880. John Hopkins University Press.
Yildiz, O. C. (2025). Defining the standardization ecosystem: an integrative framework, integrating perspectives from business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems. Bachelor thesis, LUT University. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025052048052
Zúniga, N., Burton, S., Blancato, F. & Carr, M. (2024). The geopolitics of technology standards: historical context for US, EU and Chinese approaches. International Affairs, 100(4), 1635–1652. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae124
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jussi T. S. Heikkilä
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
