European standardization in flux: Navigating delegation and control in AI governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/jos.2026.8346Keywords:
standard setting, standardization, artificial intelligence, AI governance, AI Act, orchestration, delegationAbstract
The EU confronts a dilemma in AI governance: on the one hand, it faces strong incentives to delegate detailed, technical rulemaking to private authorities. On the other hand, the political charge of these detailed rules makes it imperative to retain control over them. We investigate how the EU navigates this dilemma, and which tactics are available to it to control delegated governance in the case of AI standardization. Building on theories of global governance (Bernstein, 2010; Ruggie, 2014), we reveal the hard and soft mechanisms the European Commission can use to influence both the operation and the output of standards development organizations (SDOs). We argue that the EU’s control tactics depend on (1) its relationship with the SDO in question and (2) whether standard setters serve through delegation with granted authority or orchestration with enlisted authority. The EU is often portrayed as lagging rival superpowers, not only in AI development but also in ICT standardization. As our analysis demonstrates, however, the EU has a range of robust tactics to interfere in technical standard-setting, but in opting to deploy these tactics, might risk the overall integrity and legitimacy of European standardization more broadly.
References
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., Zangl, B. (2021a). Competence versus control: The governor’s dilemma. In Abbott, K. W., & Snidal D. (Eds.), The Spectrum of International Institutions, an interdisciplinary collaboration on global governance (pp. 233-257). Routledge.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., Zangl, B. (2021b). Orchestration: Global governance through intermediaries. In Abbott, K. W., & Snidal D. (Eds.), The Spectrum of International Institutions, an interdisciplinary collaboration on global governance (pp. 140-170). Routledge.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., Zangl, B. (2021c). Two logics of indirect governance: delegation and orchestration. In Abbott, K. W., & Snidal D. (Eds.), The Spectrum of International Institutions, an interdisciplinary collaboration on global governance (pp. 198-211). Routledge.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2021). Institutional diversity and indirect governance. In Abbott, K. W., & Snidal D. (Eds.), The Spectrum of International Institutions, an interdisciplinary collaboration on global governance (pp. 140-170). Routledge.
Arcuri, A. (2015). The transformation of organic regulation: The ambiguous effects of publicization. Regulation & Governance, 9(2), 144-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12066
Almada, M., & De Gregorio, G. (2025). The Mixed Nature of the AI Act: Product Safety and Fundamental Rights Regulation. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5770982
Baron, J., & Kanevskaia Whitaker, O. (2021). Global Competition for Leadership Positions in Standards Development Organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3818143
Baron, J., & Spulber, D. F. (2018). Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 27(3), 462-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12257
Bartley, T. (2022). Power and the Practice of Transnational Private Regulation. New Political Economy, 27(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881471
Bernstein, S. (2010). When Is Non-state Global Governance Really Governance? Utah Law Review, 1, 91–113.
Bertuzzi, L. (2022, December 7). Commission leaves European standardisation body out of AI standard-setting. Euractiv. https://www.euractiv.com/section/artificial-intelligence/news/commission-leaves-european-standardisation-body-out-of-ai-standard-setting/
Bertuzzi, L. (2025, October 27). EU AI standard setters’ pause of consensus process has international fallout. MLex. https://www.mlex.com/mlex/articles/2403848/eu-ai-standard-setters-pause-of-consensus-process-has-international-fallout
Black, J. (2003). Enrolling actors in regulatory systems: Examples from UK financial services regulation. Public Law, 63–91.
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (1st ed.). Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001
Bremmer, I., Suleyman, M. (2023). The AI Power Paradox: Can States Learn to Govern Artificial Intelligence—Before It’s Too Late? Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/artificial-intelligence-power-paradox
Brzozowski A., Brunetti A., Gkritsi E. Moller-Nielsen, T. (2025, April 4). EU officials scramble to prove Trade and Technology Council will survive Trump. Euractiv. https://www.euractiv.com/news/eu-officials-scramble-to-prove-trade-and-technology-council-will-survive-trump/
Cafaggi, F., & Pistor, K. (2015). Regulatory capabilities: A normative framework for assessing the distributional effects of regulation. Regulation & Governance, 9(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12065
Cantero Gamito, M. (2021). From Private Regulation to Power Politics: The Rise of China in AI Private Governance Through Standardisation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3794761
Cashore, B., Knudsen, J. S., Moon, J., & Van Der Ven, H. (2021). Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1166–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12395
CEN-CENELEC. (2015). CEN-CENELEC Guide 30: European Guide on Standards and Regulation - Better regulation through the use of voluntary standards - Guidance for policy makers (Edition 1). https://www.cencenelec.eu/media/Guides/CEN-CLC/cenclcguide30.pdf
CEN-CENELEC (2019, November). Membership Fee Calculation methodology and periodic review policy Edition 2. https://www.cencenelec.eu/media/Guides/CEN-CLC/cenclcguide21.pdf
CEN-CENELEC. (2025, October, 23). Update on CEN and CENELEC’s Decision to Accelerate the Development of Standards for Artificial Intelligence. https://www.cencenelec.eu/news-events/news/2025/brief-news/2025-10-23-ai-standardization/
Corporate Europe Observatory, (2025, January 9). Bias baked in: How Big Tech sets its own AI standards. https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/01/bias-baked
Centre for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET), (2021, November 8). The Chinese Communist Party Central Committee and the State Council Publish the "National Standardization Development Outline" 中共中央 国务院印发《国家标准化发展纲要》. Georgetown University. https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/t0406_standardization_outline_EN.pdf
Cuccuru, P. (2019). Interest Representation in European Standardisation: The Case of CEN and CENELEC. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3505290
Cutler, A. C. (2003). Private power and global authority: Transnational merchant law in the global political economy. Cambridge University Press.
Delimatsis, P., & Verghese, Z. (2024). “To Antipolis, my sisters!”: ETSI as a forum of contestation, collaboration and orchestration. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 37(5), 1305–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2379806
Ebers, M. (2022). Standardizing AI: The Case of the European Commission’s Proposal for an ‘Artificial Intelligence Act’*. In L. A. DiMatteo, C. Poncibò, & M. Cannarsa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (1st ed., pp. 321–344). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072168.030
Epoch AI. (2025). Data on AI models. Retrieved August 26, 2025, from https://epoch.ai/data/ai-models
European Commission. (n.d.). New Legislative Framework. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/goods/new-legislative-framework_en
European Commission. (2015). Vademecum on European Standardisation in Support of Union Legislation and Policies: Part II Preparation and Adoption of the Commission’s Standardisation Requests to the European Standardisation Organisations. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/13508/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf
European Commission. (2022). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: An EU Strategy on Standardisation Setting Global Standards in Support of a Resilient, Green and Digital EU Single Market. https://op.europa.eu/s/zgCE
European Ombudsman. (2025, September 30). Ombudswoman opens inquiry concerning the development of EU standards for artificial intelligence. https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/news-document/en/212272
European Regulation. (2012). (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European Standardisation OJ L 316/12 14 November 2012. Official Journal of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/1025/oj
European Regulation. (2022). (EU) No 2022/2480 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 OJ L 323/1 19 December 2022. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2480/oj
Fägersten, B. & Rühlig, T. (2019). China’s standard power and its geopolitical implications for Europe (UI Brief No. 2). Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
Genschel, P. (1997). How Fragmentation Can Improve Co-ordination: Setting Standards in International Telecommunications. Organization Studies, 18(4), 603-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800403
Graz, JC. (2019). The power of standards: Hybrid authority and the globalisation of services. Cambridge University Press.
Graz, JC., Nölke, A. (2012). The Limits of Transnational Private Governance. In: Guzzini, S., Neumann, I.B. (Eds), The Diffusion of Power in Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283559_5
Green, J. F. (2014). Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hhqdr
Hahn, R., & Weidtmann, C. (2016). Transnational Governance, Deliberative Democracy, and the Legitimacy of ISO 26000: Analyzing the Case of a Global Multistakeholder Process. Business & Society, 55(1), 90–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312462666
Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. The Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-013-9174-0
Héritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X08000755
High-Level Forum on European Standardisation. (2024a). Alignment between European and International standards. Final report elaborated by workstream 4. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/core/api/front/expertGroupAddtitionalInfo/54292/download
High-Level Forum on European Standardisation. (2024b, November 11). High-Level Forum recommendations on increasing funding for standardization activities at international level. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/62954
High-Level Forum on European Standardisation. (2025). Work stream 5 “Greater civil society and SME inclusion in international standardisation” Mapping, analysis and recommendations for greater civil society inclusion in standardisation at international level. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/64934
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019, April 8). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html
Kanevskaia, O. (2024). The Commission strikes back: Regulatory authority and legitimacy in European technology standardization. A commentary on Cantero Gamito and Kamara. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 37(5), 1461–1467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2332235
Kanevskaia, O. (2025). Is it really all about the money? The future of European standardization after PublicResourceOrg. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 16(1), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.64
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little, Brown. Journal of Public Policy, 5(2), 281–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003068
Krog, G.P. (2025). CEN-CENELEC JTC21 AI Standards: Complete Detailed Overview. CEN-CENELEC. https://jtc21.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/CEN-CENELEC-JTC21-AI-Standards-Complete-Detailed-Overview.pdf
Lee, K.-F. (2018). AI superpowers. China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Houghton Mifflin.
Lee, J., Zhang, E., and Creemers, R. (2022). China’s Standardisation System – trends, implications and case studies in emerging technologies. Leiden Asia Centre Report. https://leidenasiacentre.nl/chinas-standardisation-system-trends-implications-and-case-studies-in-emerging-technologies/
National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) (2024, July). A plan for Global Engagement on AI Standards (NIST AI 100-5). https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.100-5.pdf
Mattli, W. (2001). The politics and economics of international institutional standards setting: An introduction. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110056004
McFadden, M., Jones, K., Taylor E., & Osborn, G. (2021, December). Harmonising artificial intelligence: The role of standards in the EU AI regulation. Oxford Information Labs.
Meyer, N. (2012). Public intervention in private rule making: The role of the European Commission in industry standardization [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/236/1/Meyer_Public_Intervention_in_Private.pdf
Miller, C. (2022). Chip War. The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology. Scribner.
Mügge, D., Paul, R., Stan, V. (2026). The AI Matrix: Profits, Power, Politics. Agenda Publishing.
Mueller, M. (2024). Rethinking AI Governance: The Political Economy of the Digital Ecosystem. Proceedings of the TPRC2024 The Research Conference on Communications, Information and Internet Policy.
Racicot, R. Simpson, K.H. (2025, July 22). China’s AI Governance Initiative and Its Geopolitical Ambitions. Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/chinas-ai-governance-initiative-and-its-geopolitical-ambitions/
Renckens S. (2020). Explaining Public Interventions in Private Governance. In: Private governance and public authority: Regulating sustainability in a global economy (pp. 25-61). Cambridge University Press.
Renckens, S. (2021). Disaggregating public‐private governance interactions: European Union interventions in transnational private sustainability governance. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1230–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12332
Roberts, H., Hine, E., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2024). Global AI governance: Barriers and pathways forward. International Affairs, 100(3), 1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae073
Robins-Early N. (2023, July 19). Disinformation reimagined: how AI could erode democracy in the 2024 US elections. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/19/ai-generated-disinformation-us-elections
Roger, C., & Dauvergne, P. (2016). The Rise of Transnational Governance as a Field of Study. International Studies Review, 18(3), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viw001
Ruggie, J. G. (2014). Global Governance and “New Governance Theory”: Lessons from Business and Human Rights. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 20(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02001002
Schleifer, P. (2013). Orchestrating sustainability: The case of European Union biofuel governance. Regulation & Governance, 7(4), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12037
Seaman, J. (2020). China and the New Geopolitics of Technical Standardization (Notes de l'Ifri). Ifri.
Shepardson, D. (2025, January 21). Trump revokes Biden executive order on addressing AI risks. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/trump-revokes-biden-executive-order-addressing-ai-risks-2025-01-21/
Steurer, R. (2013). Disentangling governance: A synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society. Policy Sciences, 46(4), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9177-y
Stix, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence by any other name: A brief history of the conceptualization of “trustworthy artificial intelligence.” Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00041-5
Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in World politics. Cambridge University Press.
ten Oever, N., & Becker, C. (2024). Infrastructural insecurity: Geopolitics in the standardization of telecommunications networks. Media International Australia, 194(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X231225748
The White House. (2025). Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf
Vance, J.D. (2025, February 11). Remarks by the Vice President at the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris, France. The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-vice-president-the-artificial-intelligence-action-summit-paris-france.
Verbruggen, P. (2016). Understanding the ‘new governance’ of food safety: Regulatory enrolment as a response to change in public and private power. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 5(3), 418-449.
Wood, S., et al. (2019). Transnational business governance interactions, regulatory quality and marginalized actors: an introduction. In: S. Wood, R. Schmidt, E. Meidinger, B. Eberlein, & K. W. Abbott (Eds.). Transnational business governance interactions: advancing marginalized actors and enhancing regulatory quality (pp. 1-26) . Edward Elgar Publishing,
Zúñiga, N., Burton, S. D., Blancato, F., & Carr, M. (2024). The geopolitics of technology standards: Historical context for US, EU and Chinese approaches. International Affairs, 100(4), 1635–1652. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae124
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Orla Hennessy, Daniel Mügge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
