Urban planning in Guanabara State, Brazil: Doxiadis, from Ekistics to the Delos Meetings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7480/iphs.2016.6.1332Abstract
The work carried out by researchers in the urbanismo.br research network encompasses objects and the creation of frameworks, hypotheses and documents and is based on three premises: urbanization and development, urbanization and planning, and institutions. The theme related to planning (this panel) has been conducted by three researchers : Maria Cristina da Silva Leme , Fabio José Martins de Lima and Vera F. Rezende. The use of nucleation as a resource does not mean entirely discrete approaches, but rather a strategy to improve our understanding of changes in the field of urbanism and urban planning during a period of profound political transformation. The period chosen for the research is the 1960s, and we have taken into consideration the period’s setbacks and advances in accordance with the object of each piece of research. We have identified inflections, continuity and ruptures in the concepts and tendencies of the urbanism adopted in plans for different government spheres and different territorial scales and which guided the teams involved. There was increased and more complex team building, both in public bodies and in the local and foreign consultancies hired for such purposes. The conception of urban planning as a response to the unequal conditions of development that surfaced in the immediate post-war period was adapted to the policies of the new authoritarian era. We have also identified changes to the urban structuring process during the periphery expansion of Brazilian cities in the 1940s and 1950s. These changes were prompted by housing policies and investment in large infrastructure projects that redefined growth pivots and reaffirmed the new metropolitan regional character. This panel will debate the urban policies adopted by cities/thermal spas in Minas Gerais state amid the modernization of these cities before and after the 1964 military coup. We will also discuss the creation and modus operandi of the urban and regional planning offices and teams in the 1960s, especially in São Paulo. This analysis also looks into how the professional and political trajectories of the technicians that comprised the teams in these offices reveal the different concepts and trends in urbanism adopted in the various Plans drawn up for different government spheres. We also analyze how the Ekistics Theory (which was formulated by Constantinos A. Doxiadis) was applied to the Plan for Guanabara State, which was concluded in 1965. Following the Delos Meetings, this theory subsequently evolved into the concept of Network, which was based on the idea of complex relations in human activity networks and how they apply to different fields of knowledge, especially architecture and urbanism. In this research, we analyze the association between planning and authoritarian and repressive practices and the complexity behind these relations. We will observe tensions, ruptures and continuity in particular.References
Agrafiotis, D. “Ekistics a science or a tool for action? The Doxiadis paradox in the Greek research landscape”. Paper presented at Event Constantinos A. Doxiadis and his work, Athens, January 19-21, 2006.
Doxiadis Associates. Guanabara, a plan for urban development. Rio de Janeiro: Companhia Estadual de Águas da Guanabara, 1965.
Doxiadis Associates. Guanabara, um plano para o desenvolvimento urbano. Rio de Janeiro: Secretaria Municipal de Planejamento e Coordenação Geral, CEDUG, 1967.
Doxiadis, C. A. “Action for a better scientific approach to the subject of human settlements: the anthropocosmos model.” Ekistics 30 (1970), 1-12.
Doxiadis, C. A. Architecture in transition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1963.
Doxiadis, C. A. “Densities of Human Settlements: Introduction”. Ekistics 128 (1966), 77-101.
Doxiadis, C. A., Ekistics. An Introduction to the Science of Human Settlements New York, Oxford University Press, 1968
Doxiadis, C. A., “Ekistics and Regional Science”. Ekistics 84 (1962), 193-200.
Doxiadis, C. A., “Ekistics, the Science of Human Settlements”. Science 170 (1970), 393-404.
Doxiadis, C. A., “Living in High Densities, Techniques of Studying Density”. Ekistics 119 (1965), 199-208.
Doxiadis, C. A., “On Linear Cities”. Town Planning Review 38 (1967), 35-42.
Doxiadis, C. A. and J.G.Papaioannau, Ecumenopolis the inevitable city of the future. New York: W.W. Norton, 1974.
“Doxiadis, go home”. Diário da Noite. January 15 (1964): 4.
“Guanabara pode ter impostos municipais sem municípios”. O Globo, December 5 (1960): 6.
Madanipour, A., “The limits of scientific planning: Doxiadis and the Tehran Action Plan”. Planning perspectives Journal 25 (2010), 485-505.
Middleton, D. A., “Growth and expansion in post-war urban design strategies: C. A. Doxiadis and the first strategic Plan for Riyadh Saudi Arabia (1968-1972)”. PhD diss, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009.
Perez, M. D., Lacerda na Guanabara: a reconstrução do Rio de Janeiro nos anos 1960. Rio de Janeiro: Odisseia Editorial, 2007.
Rezende, V. F. M., “Ecos do modernismo: a Guanabara e o Plano Doxiadis”. In Novas Memórias do Urbanismo Carioca edited by Américo Freire and Lucia L. Oliveira, 63-101. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. FGV, 2008,
Rezende, V. F. M., Planejamento Urbano e Ideologia, quatro planos para a Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1982.
“Rio – Cidade livre, solução para o problema que surgirá com a mudança da capital para Brasília”. O Globo. July 19 (1958): 3.
Sosa, M. R., “A Guanabara de Doxiadis e a Havana de Sert. Ekistics e Urban Design, novas direções na ruptura do CIAM”. PhD diss, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2008.
Wigley, M., “Network Fever” Grey Room 04, Cambridge: Grey Room Inc. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001, 82–122.
World Society for Ekistics. “Delos declaration, Delos symposia”, In Meetings of the World Society for Ekistics. Universidad del Rosario, Bogota. 2014.
