The Translation of Dreams. Psychoanalytic and Poetic Devices in South African Architectural Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7480/writingplace.1.2074Abstract
There are two kinds of dreams. There are the dreams that we share, and there are dreams that are our own. Architecture, and the politics of dreams – or the dreams of politics, for that matter – form the context of this essay, and in particular how this thematized a design project in South African architectural education. In the South African context, where the past is often experienced as a nightmare, a fundamental inquiry into the precepts of architectural design and shared history has the potential to relocate repressed events of trauma. These events, which currently exist primarily in the historical record, can be translated into the present, and shown to still be active, but exerting their effects surreptitiously.
This essay aims to presents brief readings of three design-research projects conducted in Unit 11 of the Graduate School of Architecture (GSA) at the University of Johannesburg. A number of projects are being developed which work through (rather than resolve) concerns of material memory, cultural edifices and politics, employing metaphors of ghosts, nightmares, phantom limbs, exquisite corpses and plastic identities. By illustrating (or designing) such conditions, the unit attempts to bring to the surface some of the historical fragments haunting the South African collective subconscious.
Design-research students are encouraged to make associations more or less freely in the early stages of the design process, after which, through critique, reflexive relationships are established between designed work and its interpretation. The unit makes extensive use of allegory and figuration to create a slight distance between the students’ immediate frame of reference and the complex political realities with which the projects are entangled. This method allows students to expose and interrogate their biases and proclivities. The projects define architecture as a collective dream, condensing, sorting and forgetting our (shared) history.
References
Jacques Derrida, Dissemination, translated by B. Johnson (London: The Athlone Press, 1981)
Sigmund Freud, On Dreams (1914), translated by M.D. Eder (New York: Dover, 2001 reprint).
Sigmund Freud, ‘The “Uncanny”’ (1919), in The Complete Psychological Works, Vol. XVII (London: Hogarth Press, 1955).
Sigmund Freud, The Ego and the Id (1923), translated by Joan Riviere (1927) (New York: Norton, 1960 reprint)
J. Lee Kavanau, ‘Sleep, Memory Maintenance and Mental Disorders,’ in The Jour-nal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 12, no. 2, May (2000), 199-208.
Stéphane Leman Langlois and Clifford Shearing, ‘Transition, Forgiveness and Citi-zenship: The TRC and the Social Construction of Forgiveness’, in F. Du Bois and A. Pedain (eds.), Justice and Reconciliation in Post-Apartheid South Africa (Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 206-228.
Adam Philips, One Way and Another: New and Selected Essays (London: Penguin, 2013)
Adam Philips, ‘The Art of Nonfiction No.7’, in The Paris Review, no. 208, (2014)
Warsan Shire, ‘Conversations About Home (At the Deportation Centre)’, in Teach-ing My Mother How to Give Birth (London: Flipped Eye Publishing, 2011)
Slavoj Žižek, Trouble in Paradise: From the End of History to the End of Capitalism (London: Allen Lane, 2014)
