The Ocean Project_Planning a resilient seascape
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7480/iphs.2016.4.1305Abstract
Planning the SeaThe sea is the site of one of this century’s greatest planning challenges. It is a material, spatial, ecological and recreational resource. As a vital producer, it is also a site of spatial and environmental convergence- a condition within which economic value is threatened by overall ecological degradation. Planning is initiated as a way of regulating interactions and conflicting spatial claims. Adopting the concept of seascapes as a parallel to landscapes, this paper traces the emergence of large-scale planned seascapes both for productive and protective purposes. While a relatively recent phenomenon, planning ocean space builds on centuries of seascape construction – a process merging natural, cultural, political and geological phenomena.
But planning the sea swiftly emerges as a contradiction in terms. Static geometric fields created by cartesian coordinates bear little relevance for the intervening water-column. The ocean rolls through such boundaries, forming temporary zones through organic thresholds and obeying its own territorial logic. Which planning approaches can ensure the continued resilience of the seascape and public access to the vast ocean commons?
Seascapes
The conception of seascape has evolved since the 16th century from the picturesque genre parallel to landscape painting. However this paper argues for a primary meaning of seascape as a realm shaped manipulated and cultivated through human interaction. Referring to J. B. Jackson’s three-fold understanding of landscape as a structural basis for the discussion, the properties of his landscapes one, two and three are tested on seascapes; the productive seascape, the essentially visual seascape and the all-encompassing, amorphous hybrid of architecture and nature defined later by Koolhaas as simply “scape”. In all three, landscape exists by definition only in relation to urbanization. It is here that we begin to understand the seascape as the full interpenetration of natural and cultural systems.
Large-scale ocean planning (MSP) currently uses a combination of two-dimensional, land-based zoning tools and precautionary principles to secure maritime transport corridors, sites of wind-energy or fossil fuel production and to outline marine protected areas. In Western Europe, however, mono-functional economic priorities and superficial (of the surface) geometries clearly dominate the resulting spatial order.
Case-study
In order to examine such offshore conditions more closely, the large-scale energy seascape of Nysted Windpark in the Baltic Sea is presented as a case study. In its specific cultural-territorial context, this windpark reveals surprising interdependencies and potentials for resilience, heterogeneity and social interaction, hence moving away from a purely technological infrastructure towards an integrated public resource.
Conclusions
Large-scale planned seascapes mark the emergence of a new urban realm and a paradigm shift in maritime interactions. Rather than a plan, this realm must be approached as a project which democratically coordinates a deep, kinetic, contingent and highly differentiated spatial commons, and engages the active involvement of its global stewards.
References
BSH:Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency. ‘Marine Spatial Plan for the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Baltic Sea.’, December 2009. http://www.bsh.de/en/Marine_uses/Spatial_Planning_in_the_German_EEZ/documents2/Spatial_Plan_Baltic_Sea.pdf.
Buchloh, Benjamin H. D. Photography and Painting in the Work of Gerhard Richter : Four Essays on ‘Atlas’ / B. H.D. Buchloh... [et Al.]. [2nd ed. ]. Barcelona: Museu d’Art Contemporani de Barcelona, cop2000, 2000.
Chung, Chuihua Judy, Alice Koolhaas, Jeffrey Inaba, and Sze Tsung Leong, eds. Great Leap Forward. Project on the City 1. Köln: Taschen, 2001.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. 11th print. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.
Easterling, Keller. Enduring Innocence : Global Architecture and Its Political Masquerades. Cambridge, Mass: MIT, 2005.
Edward W. Soja. Postmetropolis : Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
Elden, Stuart. ‘Land, Terrain, Territory’. Progress in Human Geography 34, no. 6 (1 December 2010): 799–817. doi:10.1177/0309132510362603.
———. ‘Missing the Point: Globalization, Deterritorialization and the Space of the World’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30, no. 1 (2005): 8–19. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00148.x.
Elsam Engineering, and ENERGI E2. ‘The Danish Offshore Wind Farm Demonstration Project: Horns Rev and Nysted Offshore Wind Farm. Environmental Impact Assessment and Monitoring’. Review report 2003. The environmental Committee of the Danich Ofshore Wind Farm Demonstration Projects, 2003.
German Federal Agency for nature Conservation (BfN). ‘Spatial Planning in the German Exclusive Economic Zone of the North and the Baltic Seas- Nature Conservation Objectives and Principles’, 2006.
Halpern, B. S., S. Walbridge, K. A. Selkoe, C. V. Kappel, F. Micheli, C. D’Agrosa, J. F. Bruno, et al. ‘A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems’. Science 319, no. 5865 (15 February 2008): 948–52. doi:10.1126/science.1149345.
Hønneland, Geir. Making Fishery Agreements Work : Post-Agreement Bargaining in the Barents Sea. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012.
John Brinckerhoff Jackson. Discovering the Vernacular Landscape. New Haven etc: Yale University Press, 1984.
Kenneth R. Olwig. Landscape, Nature, and the Body Politic : From Britain’s Renaissance to America’s New World. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2002.
Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, UK etc: Blackwell, 1991.
Maleuvre, Didier. The horizon : a history of our infinite longing. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.
Nadaï, Alain, and Olivier Labussière. ‘Birds, Wind and the Making of Wind Power Landscapes in Aude, Southern France’. Landscape Research 35, no. 2 (2010): 209–33. doi:10.1080/01426390903557964.
Reichsteiner, Rudolph. ‘Wind Power in Context- A Clean Revolution in Hte Energy Sector’, n.d.
Sobel, Dava. Longitude : The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time. London: Fourth Estate, 1996.
Steinberg, Philip E. The Social Construction of the Ocean. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 78. Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Stilgoe, John R. Common Landscape of America, 1580 to 1845. New Haven ; London: Yale University Press, 1982.
The Environmetal Group. ‘Danish Offshore Wind. Key Environmental Issues- a Follow-Up’. Danish Energy Agency, 2013.
‘The European Offshore Wind Industry- Key Trends and Statistics 2013’. Brussels: European Wind Energy Assosiation, January 2014. http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/files/library/publications/statistics/European_offshore_statistics_2013.pdf.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2014/89/EU, 2014. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.257.01.0135.01.ENG%20.
Theutenberg, Bo Johnson. ‘Mare Clausum et Mare Liberum’. ARCTIC 37, no. 4 (December 1984). http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic37-4-481.pdf.
UN. ‘UNCLOS 1982’, 1982. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/ convention_overview_convention.htm.
Urry, John. Offshoring. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.