A Historical Investigation of Sexuality and Marked Space - Case Study: Urban Historical Neighbourhood in Tehran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7480/iphs.2016.4.1293Abstract
efore the 1970s, the adoption of an old global hypothesis (i.e. male/female dichotomy, in which different spheres are defined based on gender), was a key reason why the approach to gender justice could not attract attention in urban planning. This hypothesis argued in particular that women belong to the home and internal space and men to the public sphere and external spaces, while planning is to ensure that social justice is established and therefore the attention should inevitably give to the approach of inclusion instead of women’s exclusion. So the main goal of this paper is to discuss the concept of gender, justice, and gender justice and also present the approach of women’s inclusion vs. women’s exclusion through history of urban planning. For this investigation two urban planning models (the traditional urban planning model- comprehensive plan and the strategic urban planning model) have selected and deeply examined.For better understanding of the influences of urban planning models on producing the gendered marked space or a responsive space, neighbourhood scale as the main space of women’s presence has chosen in Tehran. Since the historical development is an important consideration in this study, Chizar neighbourhood is chosen as an appropriate case because of its long history and religious identity, and also the changes created during the process of urban development plans in Tehran. Therefore, it provides an ideal text for evaluating the level of gender justice in the context of traditional structure of Iranian neighbourhoods. This study is an applied research of descriptive-analytical nature, in which the in-depth interview was used as the data collection method and the sample size was 30. Women’s narrations about their everyday space are considered as a measure to analyse markedness, which serves as the basis for identifying dichotomies or binary oppositions that are affected by the old male/female dichotomy. The results showed that the historical neighbourhoods changed during the urban development process in Tehran have failed to respond to gender justice concerns and, compared to previous models, sometimes have worked more inappropriately and desirably in the views of women.
References
Begum, Julekha. “Women, Environment and Sustainable Development: Making the Links.” 2000, http://www.unep.org/PDF/Women/ChapterTwo.pdf
Chandler, Daniel. Semiotics: The Basics. London: Rutledge, 2003.
Day, Kristen. “The Ethic of Care and Women’s Experiences of Public Space.” Environmental Psychology 20 (2000): 103–124.
English Regional Development Agencies. “Skills for Sustainable Communities.” English Regional Development Agencies, 2004. http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/152086.pdf
Franck, Karen A., “Women and Environment,” in Handbook of Environmental Psychology, edited by Robert B. Bechtel, and Arza Churchman, 347-362.New York: John Wiley & sons, 2002.
Gehl, Jan. Life between Buildings: using public space. Washington: Island press, 1987
Hayden, Dolores “What Would a Non-sexist City be like? Speculations on Housing, Urban Design, and Human Work.” In Designing Cities, Critical Readings in Urban Design, edited by Alexander R. Cuthbert, 167-184. USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2003.
Huxley, Margo “Governmentality, Gender, Planning.” In Planning Future, edited by Philip Allmendinger and Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 136-154. London: Rutledge, 2002.
Krenichyn, Kira. “Women and Physical Activity in an Urban Park: Enrichment and Support through an Ethic of Care.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24 (2004): 117-130.
Lawanga, Margaret. “Gender, Environment and Sustainable Development.” Paper presented at Sustainable Development, Governance and Globalization Meeting: An African Forum for Strategic thinking Towards the Earth Summit 2002 and beyond, Nairobi, Kenya, September, 2001
Madanipour, Ali. Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a Socio Spatial Process. Translated by Farhad Mortazaei. Tehran: Processing and Urban Planning Publication, 2000.
McDowell, Linda. Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. UK: Polity Press, 1999.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Planning. Reforming the Management of Urban Development System in Iran, through Strategic Approach. Tehran: Assistance of Urban Planning and Architecture, Office of Architecture and Urban Design, 2008.
Mohammadi, Maryam. “Gender equality approach in designing urban space.” MA diss., Iran University of Science and Technology, 2008.
Paydar, Forouzandeh. “Evaluation of gender considerations in urban planning of new cities”. Paper presented at international meeting for new cities, Iran, Tehran, May 3-5, 2005.
Raco, Mike “Securing Sustainable Communities.” European Urban and Regional Studies, 14 (2007): 305-320.
Raco, Mike. Building Sustainable Communities, Spatial policy- place Imaginations and Labor Mobility in Post-war Britain. Bristol: Policy Press, 2007.
Rezazadeh, Razieh. “The Role of Women in Good Governance.” Paper presented at Metropolis COMMISSION 5: Metropolitan Performance Measurement, Iran, Mashhad, June 21-23, 2007.
Wekerle, Gerda R. “Women’s Right to the City: Gendered Spaces of a Pluralistic Citizenship.” In Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City, edited by Engin F. Isin, 203-217. London: Rutledge, 2002.
