Kuy-e Narmak: A Resilient Heritage of Modern Housing in Tehran, Iran


  • Seyed Sedighi TU Delft




Similar to many Middle-Eastern countries during the 20th century, Iran underwent a unique process of modernisation. This process was accelerated in Tehran after the second World War, when the urban population density dramatically grew, due to rural-urban migration, and the construction of mass housing got a prominent place in the development agenda of the Iranian government. Furthermore, for creating a modern nation that made Iran part of the civilized world, the government diffused the notion of modern living through mass housing largely carried out by a group of Western-trained Iranian architects. Creating cross-cultural exchanges, they played the mediator role between the International Style and the Iranian culture, and they helped the Iranian government to purse the objectives of the development plans. 

Accordingly, the government established a new financial organisation named Bank-e Sakhtemani (Construction Bank) to fund new urban projects, and the parliament adopted a new law by which the arid lands beyond the border of cities were declared as state properties. Doing so braced the role of Bank-e Sakhtemani in land-use strategies, and as a result, a series of new neighbourhoods was constructed in Tehran, such as Kuy-e Narmak (1951-58), Kuy-e Nazi-Abad (1952-54), and Tehran-Pars (1958-72). Among these neighbourhoods, Narmak played a crucial role in forming modern Tehran’s Identity, and the project created a strong collective identity among its residents. Situated in the North-Eastern part of Tehran, Narmak was constructed on an area of 507 hectares, from which around 200 hectares was allocated to the public and collective amenities. This project aimed at accommodating 25,000 residents; however, it houses approximately 340,000 inhabitants, at present. 

To understand this adaptability, the spatial organisation of Narmak and its development should be studied. The urban layout of Narmak proposed a series of public outdoor spaces including a grid of linear gardens (Chaharbagh), and 110 enclosed gardens (Meydan) allocated to each respective block. In the block layout, houses were located around the edges of Meydans, and the repetition of this pattern provided the urban structure of Narmak. In this structure, Chaharbaghs and Meydans have become the permanent constituting a frame around which change could take place. Although these public spaces have remained unchanged, based on new needs, the inhabitants have had the possibilities to transfer their low-rise houses to mid-rise apartments, and adapt their private spaces. Therefore, by analysing Narmak’s urban form and development, this paper reveals typological elements, socio-cultural characteristics, and economic features that led to the survival and resilience of this modern urban form over times. Understanding the development of this model demonstrates whether the process of modernisation through affordable housing practices in a non-western country such as Iran presents a sense of continuity in the structure, meaning, character and identity of place, or generates a sense of disjuncture.

Author Biography

Seyed Sedighi, TU Delft

Phd Researcher, Dept. of Architecture, TU Delft


Abdi, Mohamad Ali, Sima Mehdizadegan, and Farzaneh Kordi. Six Decades Housing Planning in Iran (1948-2008). Tehran: BHRC Publication, 2011.

Abrahamian, Ervand. A History of Modern Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Adjdari, Abbas. “Nokati Ke Dar Tarh-Haye Kuy-E Narmak Va Nazi-Abad Ra’yat Shodeh Ast [the Points Taken into Consideration in Narmak and Nazi-Abad Proposal].” Journal of Bank-e Sakhtemani 1, no. 4 (1956).

Badie, Naser. “Elaal-E Peydayesh-E Kuy-Haye Taze: Yousef-Abad, Narmak, Nazi-Abad [Causes of Constrcuting New Neighbourhoods: Yousef-Abad, Narmak, Nazi-Abad].” In Barresi-E Masael-E Ejtemaee-E Shahr-E Tehran [Investigation of Social Problems of Tehran], edited by M Motmaeni and M Hakemi, 210-18. Tehran: Tehran University Press, 1962.

———. “Layehe Arazi Mavat [the Law of Dead-Land].” Journal of Bank-e Sakhtemani 1, no. 4 (1956): 19-20.

———. “Mokhtasari Az Chand Nameh [Summery of Some Letters].” Journal of Bank-e Sakhtemani 1, no. 1 (1955): 37.

———. “Taghsim-E Zamin Alaj-E Bikhanemani Nist [Land Distribution Is Not the Solution of Homelessness].” Journal of Bank-e Sakhtemani 1, no. 2 (1955): 31-34.

Beheshti, Seyed Mohamad. “Jahan Bagh-E Irani [the World of the Persian Garden].” Golestan-e Honar 11 (2008): 7-15.

Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press 1990.

Callister, William. D. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. Wiley, 1994.

Curzon, George Nathaniel. Persia and Persian Question Vol. I, London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1892.

David, Randy. “Multiple Modernism and Modernities.” In Non-West Modernist Past on Architecture & Modernities, edited by S.W Lim and J.H Chang, 181-88. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co, 2012.

Deldam, Saleh. “The Narmak Neighbourhood.” In A documentary on Tehran’s neighbourhoods, edited by Saleh Deldam, 51 min. Tehran: IRIB 5, 2011.

Eraydin, Ayda. “Resilience Thinking for Planning.” In Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning, edited by Ayda Eraydin and Tuna Tasan-Kok, 17-38. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2013.

Eraydin, Ayda, and Tuna Tasan-Kok, eds. Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning. Vol. 106. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2013.

Falahat, Somaiyeh, and Mohamad Reza Shirazi. “New Urban Developments in Safavid Isfahan Continuity or Disjuncture?”. Planning Perspectives 27, no. 4 (2012): 611-24.

Frampton, Kenneth. Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd, 1992.

Goh, Robbie B. H. Contours of Culture: Space and Social Difference in Singapore. Hong Kong University Press, 2005.

Habibi, Rana, and Bruno De Meulder. “Architects and Architecture without Architects: Modernization of Iranian Housing and the Birth of a New Urban Form Narmak (Tehran, 1952).” Cities 45 (2015): 29-40.

Habibi, Seyed Mohsen. Az Shar Ta Shahr: Tahlili Tarikhi Az Mafhum-E Shahr Va Sima-Ye Kalbudi-E an Tafakkur Va Taassur [De La Cite a La Ville-Analyse Historique De La Conception Urbaine Et Son Aspect Physique]. Tehran: University of Tehran Press, 1999.

Heylighen, Francis. The Science of Self-Organisation and Adaptivity. Free University of Brussels: Center “Leo Apostel”, 2002.

Holling, Crawford Stanley. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4 (1973): 1-23.

Khame-ie, Anvar. Eqtesad Bedune Naft: Ebtekar-E Bozrg-E Doctor Mosaddeq [Economy without Oil: A Big Initiative of Dr. Mosaddeq]. Tehran: Nahid publication, 1996.

Khodayar, A. M. “Avalin Khaney-E Kalad Dar Kuy-E Narmak [the First Kalad House in Narmak].” Bank-e Sakhtemani Journal 1, no. 6 (1957): 10-15.

———. “Cheguneh Kuy-E Narmak Bevojud Amad [How Narmak Neighborhood Was Created].” Journal of Bank-e Sakhtemani 1, no. 1 (1955): 6-10.

Madanipour, Ali. Tehran: The Making of a Metropolis. World Cities Series. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

Moshiri, Iraj. “Akhbar-E Anjoman [News of Association].” Architect 1 (1946): 39.

———. “Hadaf-E Ma [Our Intention].” Architect 1, no. 1 (1946): 1-2.

Mumford, Eric. The Ciam Discourse on Urbanism, 1928-1960. Cambridge, Massachusett and London, England The MIT Press, 2000.

Rowe, Peter. G. Modernity and Housing. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 1993.

Seyhoun, Houshang. “Maskan Va Sabk-Haye Meli-E Memari [Housing and the National Architectural Styles].” Bank-e Rahni Journal 2, no. 6 (1967): 6-12.

Timmerman, Peter. “Vulnerability, Resilience and the Collapse of Society: A Review of Models and Possible Climatic Applications.” Monograph 1 (1981): 1-46.

Umbach, Maiken, and Bernd Huppauf. Vernacular Modernism. California: Stanford University Press, 2005.




How to Cite

Sedighi, S. (2016). Kuy-e Narmak: A Resilient Heritage of Modern Housing in Tehran, Iran. International Planning History Society Proceedings, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.7480/iphs.2016.2.1224