Re-use of Building Products in the Netherlands: The development of a metabolism based assessment approach

  • Loriane Icibaci TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment

Abstract

Over the years, the consumption of materials for construction exceeded more than half of the total materials consumed in the Netherlands, and construction waste exceeded the volume of solid waste produced by households. Since the introduction of the "Ladder van Lansink" (in the 1970’s) and the further development of the European Waste Framework Directives followed by the Circular Economy concept, waste prevention has been considered a priority measure. Whereas the goals to improve waste management towards waste-to-resource and waste elimination evolved from guidelines to political action (throughout the EU), reuse of products remained a less implicit strategy. The reuse of building products is an ancient practice; nonetheless, limited information is available regarding the aspects involved in the existing process. Reuse of building products has seen limited regulatory changes and remained a vague procedure within the resource efficiency discourse in the Netherlands.

Building products remain in use for long time spans, which affects the planning and integration of strategies to recover them for reuse. When they are released from buildings (after renovation or demolition) and recovered, these products may not be compatible with new updated technical building requirements, or may not be competitive with upgraded, certified and cheaper new products.

The weight, size, and practical challenges to deconstruct buildings are also factors affecting the harvest of such products. Besides these technical and economic aspects, used goods are susceptible to subjective evaluation regarding their "style" and used appearance. Contrary to different forms of waste treatment that transform used products into commodities; used products have intrinsic cultural, historical and aesthetic values influencing their economic value.

To foster the integration of industrial activities to promote more efficient use of resources from the anthropogenic environment, it requires a better understanding of the constraints and opportunities among relations within a non-linear economy.

This research departs from the desire to understand the practice of reuse of building products from a systemic standpoint, to illuminate its current condition and help to foresee future perspectives.

System

The holistic approach in this research implies the investigation and representation of a network of multiple factors influencing the process of reusing in analogy to the nature of sustainability as a systemic concept that infers a holistic construction of different conceptual subsets.

To perceive the continuity of the strategy of reuse, this research positions the object of study from an evolutionary perspective where relations condition the action of reuse. These relations are dynamic and contextually bounded defining the commercial feasibility of products to be reused rather than wasted.

Understanding these relations enables to construct an analytical discourse that takes into consideration a multidisciplinary approach from which different strategies can be designed while contemplating their connectivity.

From a pragmatic research tradition, the central research question explored is:

What are the perspectives for reuse of building products from the housing stock, given contextual factors that influence the process chain and reserves?

The Industrial Ecology concept provides a system’s perspective and the foundation of this study’s methodological framework to answer the main research question. It postulates that the internal relations of the industrial process, as well as relations that go beyond the industrial boundary, are sources of perturbations in the natural system, which is driven by human activities and motivate changes in material and substance flows by demand for services provided by products.

Through this systemic perspective, to effectuate reuse of building products in the Netherlands, this research proposes to examine this practice as an industrial ecosystem. It describes the activities; actors and how different factors influence the process of building products' reuse.

This research is the result of a collaboration between the Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering and Architecture and the Built environment of TU Delft to construct a multi-scale scope ranging product thinking and regional resource management. The investigation departs from the following assumptions:

Reuse of products brings environmental benefits.

This study does not evaluate which conditions and what are the environmental benefits of reuse. Nonetheless, the study acknowledges that not one-measure fits all, nor that reuse is the best measure in all contexts. The study departs from the premise established by existing guidelines in waste management and the CE (Circular Economy) concept that waste prevention including reuse should be prioritized.

Assessing singular aspects of reuse can lead to limited or partial interpretations, risking future ineffective action plans or their complete absence.

The practice of reuse is inferred in this study as a cluster of activities that co-exists with other clusters of activities (recycling industry, technological evolution of construction systems and product innovation, waste management, lifestyle, environmental education, policy, primary resources among others), and that changes occurred in each of these parts can also affect the performance of reuse. Single focus analyses are needed but complementary to the holistic approach to increment knowledge and verification of findings.

The Industrial Ecology concept is used to emphasize the relevance to develop a systemic vision of reuse. The approach developed in this research exposes the connectivity between different factors and activities within the process and illuminates how these activities are performed. As result, different paths could be designed to improve the performance of the system.

Description of the existent practices can help sharpen the understanding of the waste prevention of building products among scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.

This research departs from the observation of the existing practice of reuse in the Netherlands to develop a tangible form of analysis and representation of the phenomena in the real world. The research contributes to the waste prevention and management debate, the possible conceptual vagueness, lack of detailing and transparency of what reuse consists, and how waste prevention is equivocally related to curbing economic growth. It also adds knowledge to the concerns of building a systemic approach for a CE exposed by previous scholars.

Research structure

A design-based research framework is applied to articulate how the study was performed. The analysis was divided into two main parts:

The organizational, socio-economic and technological aspects of building products reuse.

This segment examines internal relations of the industrial system of reuse, comprised by a description of the organization of activities and actors involved that characterize the supply chain and the practice of commercial reuse of building products in the Netherlands. The relations that go beyond the industrial boundary are clustered by the social, cultural economic, and technological factors influencing how building products are harvested from the building stock for consumption.

Conventionally, natural systems are assessed regarding the impact caused by industrial activities or the availability of resources to supply these same activities. As the anthropogenic environment evolves, it is relevant to comprehend how fit the industrial system is in this dynamic context, leading to the second part of the study:

The evolution of the housing stock as dynamic reserves (supply of reusable products).

The industry of reuse, by analogy, relies on the evolution of the building stock to supply the consumption of reusable building products. To exam this relation, the study investigates what products are commercially reusable (present). These products are a reference to the examination of the housing stock evolution (reserves), which affects the supply of reusable products in speed, composition, and amount of products released from the stock.

Finally, the research methodology delimits the industrial ecology of reuse as the sum of different relations influencing the flows of products harvested for commercial transactions of used building products. The representation of this network of relations reveals vulnerabilities and potentials in the industrial system to support future effectuation and evaluations for practice and policy. The conceptual model proposed is a map, a tool to assist the formulations of plans and tests in the learning curve to systematically implement waste prevention measures in the Netherlands.

Findings

The following limitations guided the mixed methodology proposed in this study: Scarce information about the practice of building product reuse in the Netherlands including social demand for used products; the availability of hard numeric information in waste prevention and periodic consumption of building products for housing construction; the metabolism of the building stock in the Netherlands including information about the survivability and obsolescence of houses as well as periodic physical description of housing the stock at the product level and building sizes.

In the first part, the research process was based on literature review, surveys and semi-structured interviews with practitioners in product reuse, experts in construction waste management, governmental agencies and designers. The central object in this stage is the representation of the industrial system of reuse connected to several relations that influence its performance. The key findings in this segment were:

Organizational

The practice of reuse currently functions as an appendix of the demolition industry, bringing benefits as well as disadvantages. Among the benefits is a lean and integrated management of activities able to absorb time, administrative and economic hurdles. Some of the disadvantages are the limited formalization and specialization of activities as product development (treatment of used products), quality control and marketing, as well as lack of formal representation affecting public recognition and political support.

Economic

In the economic context, direct costs involved in the process of reusing including transportation, storage, and workforce to deconstruct (associated with technology), as well as costs associated with processes to recondition used products for retail are critical parts of the economic equation. External factors influencing the economic benefits of reuse are for instance related to developments in waste management, tipping fees, fines of mixed materials and, prices of virgin materials and new products. The economic performance of reuse is also affected by investments and other forms of stimuli focused on developments in waste treatment or by policy regulating waste disposal and resource recovery.

Social

The social component is not only critical but has also been the least understood within the reuse process. Potential users and “waste” owners fundamentally lack knowledge on how to reuse, information about used products, where to find them and what are the benefits of reusing. Lack of certifications, warranties, standardization of products are also factors affecting the demand for used products. Additionally, the demand for used products concerns the interaction with potential consumers as the shopping experience, the image of the used product determining the “value” of the product and of reusing. Value is liable to change according to how the consumer perception arises about used products, about the action and experience to reuse and the economic benefits.

Technological

Technology is not yet developed in the building product reuse industry through three perspectives:

Building deconstruction evolved to harvest materials for recycle rather than harvesting products for reuse;

Construction technologies of new buildings indicated to evolve towards concrete intense systems less feasible to be deconstructed for reuse; and

The absence of quality control of used products to be applied in new constructions can pose risks to the performance of new buildings.

In this context, integrating cascading reuse indicated to be a beneficial strategy complementary to reuse. Although the challenges to develop methods to efficiently process (remanufacture, resize, recondition) used components into new products while securing quality standards, safety requirements and economic viability exist; cascading reuse can help to overcome barriers related to public perception and consumption of used products.

Lastly, the dynamic character of how the socioeconomic and technological relations identified above occur in the real world has to be taken into account to comprehend the status of building product reuse and to foresee future adaptation. Although improvements can be made in each one of these relations, it is relevant to understand how they can affect the system combined. For instance, increase building disassembly does not guarantee increase demand for used products in the future.

Reserves

Whereas the first part of the study revealed that a combination of factors defines what is commercially reusable in the Netherlands, the second part research analyses the capacity of product reuse in an existent context as a reference to estimate or plan strategies for future continuity. The juxtaposition between the operability of the industry of reuse and the evolution of the building stock represents the organization of a “typical” supply chain of reuse in the Netherlands.

Although in the real world different factors combined influence changes in the housing stock, in this research, the method to analyze trends in the housing stock behavior explored the evolution of different characteristics in the stock through binary “increase” or “decrease” trends based on historical data. The key findings in this research stage were:

Regarding housing survivability, the housing stock in the Netherlands evolved to be characterized by single-family private houses, apparently larger, built under non-traditional methods and better sound constructed compared to the recent post-war period. These characteristics indicated to influence (increase) housing survivability. Especially in the West, where most activities in the national housing stock are concentrated, the increase of private single-family houses influences overall housing survivability in the Netherlands (particularly when the pre-1946 group gradually decreases).

Regarding amounts of materials released accumulating in the housing stock, consumption of building materials per capita as well as continued housing stock increase were observed. As the population of single households expands, it is uncertain that house sizes will continue to rise as well. Nonetheless, despite the growth of material stock, the amount of material output can be offset by the increase housing survivability.

Regarding types of materials, the study of frequent house typologies, as well as the analysis of material consumption trends, indicates stronger dissipation of stony based products, and in particular concrete and plastic based, in comparison to wood ceramics and metals. The decrease of traditionally built houses can influence decrease supply of used wood in the future, inflicting the industry of reuse to adapt to these changes.

The analysis of trends in the housing stock and material consumption revealed how the supply of materials could affect reusing. The understanding of such trends at product scale resulted to be challenging through top- bottom approach and traditional material flow accounting. The study of the evolution of physical characterization of the housing stock from a bottom-up approach produced more consistent insight of housing stock trends at product level. Improving the classification system of the built housing stock according to physical characteristics including housing typologies, building age, description of building products (some of these characteristics are already being assessed to monitor energy efficiency) can facilitate monitoring of future material management. Strategies designed to improve waste prevention through reuse could be limited if they do not consider knowledge improvement of material reserves.

The stock is getting larger but there should be delays in material output for reuse through withdraws due to the increase housing survivability. The accumulation of stony based products indicates future challenges to overcome as the technical and economic viability to reuse them and demand for this type of products; especially when considering the competition with technological advances aiming to improve recyclability of concrete.

Tool

Finally, this holistic approach generates an overview of how dynamics in the housing stock and socioeconomic, and technological factors, associated direct and adjacent to the reuse process influence what is harvested for reuse in practice. The representation of these dynamic relations composes a conceptual model, which is the representation of the metabolism of building product reuse in the Netherlands. This “map” offers a way to improve the visualization and the understanding of how the trajectories of flows of products are reused as well as the motivations, conditions, and limitations behind them.

It is a tool that facilitates future assessments on how to improve the recovery of products for reuse (illustrated by the case of wooden products); how to support decision making by practitioners and policymakers; how to detect the connectedness among different aspects of building product reuse. Ultimately it offers different paths to (re) generate additional evaluation or action with the aim to adapt the practice of reuse to changing conditions.

The proposed conceptual model evolved from a composition of concepts adapted from the Industrial Ecology theoretical background to represent the system of the typical commercial practice of reuse of building products in the Netherlands, supplied by-products derived from the housing stock, and are centralized on the role of the practitioner. Accordingly, the data collection and most findings from the qualitative analysis departed from clustering information structured by the preconceived theoretical framework.

Overall, the insight out of this research indicates that more work needs to be done in the direction to optimize existing relations associated with materials derived from building demolition activities in the Netherlands, to improve efficiencies through these relations foreseeing future integration with the evolution of waste management and circular resource management, and as well as diversify stakeholders unfolding in new collaboration, business models and new supply chains.

References

Addis, W. (2012). Building with reclaimed components and materials: a design handbook for reuse and recycling. Routledge.

Addis, W. and Schouten, J. (2004). Principles of Design for Deconstruction to Facilitate Reuse and Recycling, London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association

Adriaanse, A., Brigenzu, S., Hammond, A., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D. and Schutz, H. (1997). Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrial Economies. World Resources Institute, Washington DC.

Agentschap, N. L. (2011)a. Bestaande Bouw Voorbeeldwoningen 2011. Als het gaat om energie en klimaat. Sittard.

Agentschap, N. L. (2011)b. Nederlands afval in cijfers, 2000-2008. Agentschap NL.

Agentschap, N. L. (2011)c. Voorbeeldwoningen 2011, Onderzoeksverantwoording. Energie en Klimaat, Sittard.

Agentschap, N. L. (2012). Energie besparings monitor 2010-2011. Agentschap NL. Energie en Klimaat, Sittard.

Alakangas E. (ed) (2009) Summary report of combustion test, BioNormII_ Pre-Normative research on solid biofules for im-proved European standards, Project n0. 038644, DIV7-Part 7 www.bionorm2.eu.

Alakangas E., Wiik C, Rathbauer J., Sulzbacher L., Kilgus D., Baumbach G., Grammelis P., Malliopoulou A., Naoum M., van Erp F., van Asselt B. (2008). Used wood and chemically treated industrial wood residues and by-products in the EU. Part 2. Catalogue of used wood examples, BioNormII – Pre-normative research on solid biofuels for improved Euro-pean standards, Project no. 038644, DIV6-Part 3. (www.bionorm2.eu).

Albin, S. (1997). Building a System Dynamics Model: Conceptualization (D-4597), System Dynamics in Education Project, System Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retreived from: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/sloan-school-of-management/15-988-system-dynamics-self-study-fall-1998-spring-1999/readings/building.pdf.

Allen, T. F. H., Tainter, J. A., Pires, J. C., & Hoekstra, T. W. (2001). Dragnet Ecology—“Just the Facts, Ma'am”: The Privilege of Science in a Postmodern World: Science of intrinsic quality needs narratives with explicit values—not just facts—particularly as it faces multiple-level complexity in advising on environmental policy, such as planning for energy fu-tures. BioScience, 51(6), 475-485.

Allenby, B. (1999). Culture and industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(1), 2-4.

Allwood, J. M., Cullen, J. M., Carruth, M. A., Cooper, D. R., McBrien, M., Milford, Milfford, R. L., Moynihan , M. C., Patel, A. C. (2012). Sustainable materials: with both eyes open (p. 384). Cambridge: UIT Cambridge.

Alonso, E., Gregory, J., Field, F., & Kirchain, R. (2007). Material availability and the supply chain: risks, effects, and responses; MIT- Materials Systems Laboratory: MIT.

Andersson, B. A. and I. Råde. 2002. Material constraints on technology: The case of scarce metals and emerging energy technologies. In A handbook of industrial ecology, edited by R. U. Ayres and L. W. Ayres. Cheltenham , UK : Edward Elgar.

Andriessen, D. (2008). Combining design-based research and action research to test management solutions. In Towards quality improvement of Action research: developing ethics and standards., Boog B, Slagter M, Zeelen J, Preece J (eds). Sense Publishers: Roterdam; 125-134.

Apricod (2012). Guide Towards Sustainable Plastic Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Europe.” Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.showFile&rep=file&fil=APRICOD_toolbox_brochure.pdf

Arcadis, Vito, Umweltbbundesamt, BioIntelligence (2011). Final report: Analyses of the Evolution of waste reduction and the scope of waste prevention, European Commission Dg Environment. Antwerpen: Arcadis.

Archidat (2012). BouwdetailWijzer. Handboek duurzaam en energiezuinig renoveren. Retrieved from: https://www.appartementeneigenaar.nl/images/540691/PDF-Onderzoek/16.pdf

Arditi, S. and Georgeson, R. Campaign Guide to the Waste Framework Directive transposition – opportunities and actions for NGOs. Ed. John Hontelez, European Environmental Bureau. No year available.

Arold, H. and Koring, C. (2008). New vocational ways and qualifications for professionalisation in the second-hand sec-tor. Institure, Technology and Building, Universität Bremen. 62.

Asam, C. (2007). Recycling prefabricated concrete components a contribution to sustainable construction, IEMB.

Ashby, M. F. "Materials and the Environment. Eco Informed Material Choice". Elsevier 2nd Edition 2013, p. 80.

Ashby, M. F., & Johnson, K. (2002). Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Augiseau, V., & Barles, S. (2017). Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 123, 153-164.

Ayres R. U (1989). Industrial metabolism. InTechnology and the Environment, ed. JH Ausubel, HE Sladovich, pp. 23–49. National Academies.

Ayres, R. U. (1997). Metals recycling: economic and environmental implications. Resources, conservation and recycling, 21(3), 145-173.

Ayres, R. U. Theory and Policy in Allenby, B. R., & Richards, D. J. (Eds.). (1994). The greening of industrial ecosystems. National Academies.

Ayres, R. U., & Kneese, A. V. (1969). Production, consumption, and externalities. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 282-297.

Ayres, R. U., & Simonis, U. E. (1994). Industrial metabolism: Restructuring for sustainable development. United Nations University Press.

Ayres, R. U., Ayres, L. W., & Klöpffer, W. (1997). Industrial ecology: Towards closing the material cycle. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2(3), 154-154.

Ayres, R. U. and Allen V. Kneese (1968), ‘Environmental pollution’. In Federal Programs for the Development of Human Re-sources, 2, Washington, DC: Joint Economic Committee, US Congress.

Bai, X., Van Der Leeuw, S., O’Brien, K., Berkhout, F., Biermann, F., Brondizio, E. S., ... & Revkin, A. (2015). Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: a new research agenda. Global Environmental Change, 39, 351-362.

Baccini, P., & Brunner, P. H. (1991). Metabolism of the anthroposphere. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag.

Bakas, L., Bøe, E., Kirkeby, J., Kjær, B. J., Ohls, A. K., Sidenmark, J., & Mandrup, M. U. (2011). Assessment of initiatives to prevent waste from building and construction sectors. Nordic Council of Ministers.

Barneveld et al. (2016). Regulatory barriers for the Circular Economy Lessons from ten case studies. Technopolis Group, Fraunhofer ISI, Thinkstep, Wuppertal Institute. Retrieved from: https://www.technopolis-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2288-160713-Regulary-barriers-for-the-circular-economy_accepted_HIres.pdf

BCIS. (2006). Life Expectancy of Building Components: Surveyors' Experiences of Buildings in Use: a Practical Guide. BCIS.

Beamon, B. M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. International journal of production economics, 55(3), 281-294.

Beck, J., & Stolterman, E. (2016). Examining Practical, Everyday Theory Use in Design Research. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(2), 125-140.

Beerepoot, M., & Beerepoot, N. (2007). Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy perfor-mance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector. Energy Policy, 35(10), 4812-4825.

Berge, B. (2009). The ecology of building materials. Routledge.

Bergsdal, H., Bohne, R. A., & Brattebø, H. (2007)a. Projection of construction and demolition waste in Norway. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(3), 27-39.

Bergsdal, H., Brattebø, H., Bohne, R. A., & Müller, D. B. (2007)b. Dynamic material flow analysis for Norway's dwelling stock. Building Research & Information, 35(5), 557-570.

Biesta, G. J. J., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Bio by Deloitte (2015). Screening Template for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in the Netherlands. European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/deliverables/CDW_The%20Netherlands_Factsheet_Final.pdf

Bio Intelligence Service (2011). Service contract on management of construction and demolition waste - SR1 Final Report Task 2. European Commission (DG ENV). Framework Contract ENV.G.4/FRA/2008/0112, Paris, France.

Bio Intelligence Service (2012). European Commission Directorate-General Environment. Preparing a Waste Prevention Pro-gramme. Guidance Document. Paris, Bio Intelligence. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/prevention/pdf/Waste%20prevention%20guidelines.pdf

BioRegional (2007). Reclamation Led Approach to Demolition. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Retrieved from: http://bioregional.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ReclamationtoDemolition_Jul07.pdf

BioRegional (2008)a. Reclaimed building products guide. A guide to procuring reclaimed building products and materials for use in construction projects. Waste & Resources Action Programme (wrap). Retrieved from: http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Reclaimed%20building%20products%20guide.pdf

BioRegional Development Group (2008)b. Generic Business Plan for a new UK Building Material Reuse Centre (BMRC). Including resources for developing a site specific plan. Center for Remanufacturing and Reuse. Retrieved from: http://www.remanufacturing.org.uk/pdf/story/1p287.pdf

Blaauw, K. (2000). Recycling and reuse of building components in the housing sector; environmental potential, possibilities and conditions. In International Symposium on Intergrated Life-Cycle Design of Materials and Structures (pp. 372-376). RILEM Publications SARL.

Blaazer, A. and van Gessel, F.Th. (2011). Bouwproducten. Vervaardiging, Toepassen, Onderhoud, Hergebruik. Thiememeulenhoff.

Blijie, B., Hulle, R. van, Poulus, C. and Hooimeijer, P. (2009). Het wonen overwogen – De resultaten van het WoonOnder-zoek Nederland 2009, Ministerie van VROM/WWI en CBS, Den Haag.

Blom, A., Bus, M., & Snoodijk, D. (2004). De typologie van de vroeg-naoorlogse woonwijken. Rijksdienst voor de Monu-mentenzorg (RDMZ).

Blom, I. (2005). Aanzet tot een nieuw LCA-model voor gebouwen. Theoretische en praktische knelpunten in de levenscyclusanalyse voor gebouwen en de zwaartepunten in het milieuprofiel van woningen. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.

Blomsma, F., & Brennan, G. (2017). The emergence of circular economy: A new framing around prolonging resource productivity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 603-614.

Boardman, B. (2004). Starting on the road to sustainability: Environmentally sustainable buildings: challenges and policies. Building Research & Information, 32(3), 264-268.

Bocken, N. M., Olivetti, E. A., Cullen, J. M., Potting, J., & Lifset, R. (2017)a. Taking the circularity to the next level: a special issue on the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 476-482.

Bocken, N. M., Ritala, P., & Huotari, P. (2017)b. The circular economy: exploring the introduction of the concept among S&P 500 firms. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 487-490.

Bohne, R. A., Brattebø, H., & Bergsdal, H. (2008). Dynamic Eco-Efficiency Projections for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Strategies at the City Level. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(1), 52-68.

Bone, A.H.L.G. and Kemps, T.N.W.G. (2000). Tabellenboek Bouwkunde. Noordhoff Uitgevers.

Boosten, M., & Oldenburger, J. (2012). Op weg naar 32 PJ uit bos, natuur, landschap en de houtketen in 2020!: stand van zaken in de NBLH-sector in 2011. Stichting Probos.

Boehme, L. et al. (2012). ValReCon20-Valorization of Recycled Concrete Aggregates in Concrete C20/25 & C25/30. Leuven: ACCO.

Bosman, G. L. (2014). From parts to products: Using a wastestream for new product development. (Thesis, Delft University of Technology).

Bossink, B. A. G., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (1996). Construction waste: quantification and source evaluation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 122(1), 55-60.

Bot, P. A. (2009). Vademecum: historische bouwmaterialen, installaties en infrastructuur. Alphen aan de Maas: Veerhuis.

Bouwkennis (2012). Whitepaper marktomvang deuren. Retrieved from: http://www.bouwkennis.nl

Bouwkennis(2012). Whitepaper marktomvang Kozijnen. Retrieved from: http://www.bouwkennis.nl

Bouwmetstal (2010). Market survey and analyses – Multi-storey buildings and industrial buildings. Management Sum-mary. Provided by Mic Barendz.

Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they're built. Penguin.

Brezet, J. C., Bijma, A. S., Ehrenfeld, J., & Silvester, S. (2001). The design of eco-efficient services. Methods, tools and review of the case study based “Designing eco-efficent Services” project. Report for Dutch Ministries of Environment (VROM).

Bringezu, S. (2006). Materializing policies for sustainable use and economy-wide management of resources: Biophysical perspectives, socio-economic options and a dual approach for the European Union (No. 160). Wuppertal papers.

Bringezu, S., & Bleischwitz, R. (2009). Sustainable resource management. Trends, visions and policies for Europe and the World. Greenleaf, Sheffield.

Brinksma, H. (2017). Toekomstbestendig renoveren. A+ BE| Architecture and the Built Environment, (13), 1-286.

Brundtland, G., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., Chidzero, B., Fadika, L., Hauff, … & Singh, M. (1987). Our common fu-ture. Oxford University Press, Oxford (\'brundtland report\').

Brunner, P. H. (1999). In search of the final sink. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 6(1), 1-1.

Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2002). Anthropogenic metabolism and environmental legacies. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change. Wiley, New York.

Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical handbook of material flow analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9(5), 337-338.

Brunner, P. H., Daxbeck, H., & Baccini, P. (1994). Industrial metabolism at the regional and local level: A case-study on a Swiss region. Industrial metabolism: Restructuring for sustainable development, 163-193.

atton, W. (1986). Carrying capacity and the limits to freedom. Social Ecology Session, 1, X1.

Caves, R. E. (1980). Industrial organization, corporate strategy and structure. In Readings in Accounting for Management Control (pp. 335-370). Springer, Boston, MA.

CBS. Verbruik Bouwmaterialen, 1975-1982”. In Analyse werkvoorraad Tilburg - Officiële bekendmakingen. Retrieved from: https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-25834-39-b7.pdf

Centrum Hout (2005). Naaldhout in de Bouw Producten, Toepassingen en Aanbevelingen. Bjalmere, Netherlands.

Chen, Z., Li, H., & Wong, C. T. (2002). An application of bar-code system for reducing construction wastes. Automation in Construction, 11(5), 521-533.

Chen, Z., Li, H., Kong, S. C., Hong, J., & Xu, Q. (2006). E-commerce system simulation for construction and demolition waste exchange. Automation in Construction, 15(6), 706-718.

Chini, A.R. (Ed.), (2005). Deconstruction and Materials Reuse – An International Overview. CIB Report TG 39, Publication 300, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Chini, A., Bruening, S. (2005). Deconstruction and materials reuse in the United States. In: Chini, A. (Eds.), Deconstruction and Materials Reuse – An International Overview, CIB Publication, 300.

Commoner, B. (1997). The relation between industrial and ecological systems. Journal of cleaner production, 5(1-2), 125-129.

Corsten, M., Worrell, E., van Duin, A., Rouw, M. (2010). Saving materials. Een verkening van de Potentiële Bijdrage van Duurzaamn Afval en Recyclingbeleid aan Broeikasgasemissiereductie in Nederland (in Dutch). Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. September 2010.

Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., ... & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global environmental change, 26, 152-158.

Coyle, G. (2000). Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: some research questions. System Dynamics Review, 16(3), 225-244.

Crowther, P. (1999). Design for disassembly. BDP environment design guide. Retrieved from: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/2882/1/Crowther-RAIA-1999.PDF

Crowther, P. (2001). Developing and Inclusive Model for Design for Deconstruction. Proc. Deconstruction Meeting, TG 39, CIB World Building Congress. 266.

Cullen, J. M. (2017). Circular economy: theoretical benchmark or perpetual motion machine?. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 483-486.

Daigo, I., Igarashi, Y., Matsuno, Y., & Adachi, Y. (2007). Accounting for steel stock in Japan. ISIJ international, 47(7), 1065-1069.

Dainty, A. R., & Brooke, R. J. (2004). Towards improved construction waste minimisation: a need for improved supply chain integration?. Structural Survey, 22(1), 20-29.

Daly, H. (1986). Comments on "population growth and economic development." Population and Development Review 12, 583-585.

Daugherty, P. J. et al. Supply Chain Issues: What’s Keeping Supply Chain Managers Awake At Night? APICS Supply Chain Council, Michigan State University. Retrieved from: http://www.apics.org/docs/default-source/scc-non-research/supply-chain-issues.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Davis, J. B. (2012). Suitability of salvaged timber in structural design (Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

De Bekker, P. J. G. M. Materiaalgebruik in de Nederlandse bouw. Economisch Instituut voor de Bouwnijverheid, (1998). In Goverse, Tessa, et al. "Wood innovation in the residential construction sector; opportunities and constraints." Re-sources, Conservation and Recycling 34.1 (2001): 53-74

De Boer, R. C. (1995). “The tropical timber market in 11 European countries in 1993.” Stichting Bos & Hout, ITTO/SBH, Wageningen in Goverse, Tessa, et al. "Wood innovation in the residential construction sector; opportunities and constraints." Resources, Conservation and Recycling 34.1 (2001): 53-74.

De Bree, M. A. (2006). Waste and innovation. How waste companies and government can interact to stimulate innovation in the Dutch waste industry (Thesis, Delft University of Technology).

De Groot , C. and Oldenburger , J. (2011). De Nederlandse markt voor gezaagd tropisch- en gezaagd gematigd loofhout. Stichting Probos.

De Groot, H. L., Marlet, G., Teulings, C., & Vermeulen, W. (2015). Cities and the urban land premium. Edward Elgar Publishing.

De Haas, F. and Gort, R. (2002). IFD Haalbaarheidsstudie: Hergebruikcaroussel. Voorburg.

De Haes, H. U., van der Voet, E., & Kleijn, R. (1997). Substance flow analysis (SFA), an analytical tool for integrated chain management. In Regional and National Material Flow Accounting: From Paradigm to Sustainability, Proceedings of the ConAccount Workshop, Leiden, The Netherlands (pp. 32-42).

De Jonge, T. (2005). Cost effectiveness of sustainable housing investments. (Thesis, Delft University of Technology).

De Lange, S. (2011). Partieel funderingsherstel van woningblokken: Het opstellen van een richtlijn voor partieel funderings-herstel. (Thesis, Delft University of Technology).

De Vries et al. (2005) Handleiding Duurzaam Slopen. SEV Realisatie. Rotterdam. Retrieved from: http://www.sev-realisatie.nl/

De Wilde, P. G. M., Anthonissen, I. H., & Keijzer, J. (1996). Afzet afvalstoffen als secundaire grondstoffen: milieuhygiënische kwaliteit van secundaire bouwstoffen. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiene, Bilthoven.

Decker, E. H., Elliott, S., Smith, F. A., Blake, D. R., & Rowland, F. S. (2000). Energy and material flow through the urban eco-system. Annual review of energy and the environment, 25.

Dehoust, G., Küppers, P., Bringezu, S., & Wilts, C. H. (2010). Development of scientific and technical foundations for a na-tional waste prevention programme. UBA-Texte Nr. 59/2010, Dessau.

Deilmann, C. (2009). Urban metabolism and the surface of the city. In Guiding Principles for Spatial Development in Ger-many (pp. 1-16). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Delahaye, R. (2004). NAMEA-solid waste accounts. Internal report, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg.

Delahaye, R. and Baldé, K. (2016). De Nederlandse economie. Circulaire Economie in Nederland 2016/06. CBS, The Hague.

Delahaye, R. et al. (2013). Environmental accounts of the Netherlands 2012. CBS, The Hague.

Delahaye, R., & Nooteboom, L. (2009). Material flow accounts in the Netherlands, time series 1996-2006. Project and re-port commissioned by the European Community.

Den Otter, H.J. (2007). Woningvoorraadgegevens 2006. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu_ VROM.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. Routledge.

Dewulf, J., Van der Vorst, G., Versele, N., Janssens, A., & Van Langenhove, H. (2009). Quantification of the impact of the end-of-life scenario on the overall resource consumption for a dwelling house. Resources, conservation and recycling, 53(4), 231-236.

Diederen, P. J. M., Kemp, R. P. M., Muysken, J., Palm, F. C., & Bartels, C. P. A. (1989). Diffusie van technologie, veranderingen in werkgelegenheid en beroepenstructuur: een modelmatige analyse. Technologie en economie: licht op een black box?/onder red. van: WCL Zegveld en JWA van Dijk, 211-233.

Dijk, M. V. (1998). Houtgebruik in de Woningnieuwbouw. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University, Department of Sci-ence. Technology and Society.

Dijkema, G. P. J., Reuter, M. A., & Verhoef, E. V. (2000). A new paradigm for waste management. Waste management, 20(8), 633-638.

Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Text with EEA relevance). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098&from=EN

Douglas, I., & Lawson, N. (1998). Problems associated with establishing reliable estimates of materials flows linked to ex-tractive industries. In Ecologizing Societal Metabolism. Third ConAccunt Meeting, CML, report (Vol. 148, pp. 127-134).

Duffy, F. (1990). Measuring building performance. Facilities, 8(5), 17-20.

Durmisevic, E. (2006). Transformable building structures. (Thesis, Delft University of Technology).

Durmisevic, E., & Noort, N. (2003). Re-use potential of steel in building construction. In CIB Publication (Vol. 287).

Econometrics, C., & Bio, I. S. (2014). Study on modelling of the economic and environmental impacts of raw material consumption. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Ehrenfeld, J. (2008). Sustainability by design: A subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. Yale University Press.

Ehrenfeld, J. R., & Chertow, M. R. (2002). 27. Industrial symbiosis: the legacy of Kalundborg. A handbook of industrial ecology, 334.

Ehrenfeld, J., & Gertler, N. (1997). Industrial ecology in practice: the evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. Journal of industrial Ecology, 1(1), 67-79.

Eikelboom, R. T., Ruwiel, E., & Goumans, J. J. J. M. (2001). The building materials decree: an example of a Dutch regulation based on the potential impact of materials on the environment. Waste Management, 21(3), 295-302.

Eisenriegler, S. Prevention, reuse, recycling: Closing the loop. General background situation and legislation. Retrieved from: http://www.iswa.org/uploads/tx_iswaknowledgebase/617707_Paper.pdf

Eisner, E. W. (1993). Reshaping assessment in education: Some criteria in search of practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(3), 219-233.

Eisner, E. W. (2002). "From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching." Teaching and teacher education 18.4: 375-385.

Elias-Özkan, S. T. (2002). An overview of demolition, recovery, reuse and recycling practices in Turkey. Proceedings of the CIB Task Group, 39, 128-138.

ERMCO (2008). European Ready-Mixed Concrete Industry Statistics Year 2007. Retrieved from: http://www.thbb.org/media/1940/ermco-2007.pdf

European Commission (2012). Guidance on the interpretation of key provisions of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/framework/pdf/guidance_doc.pdf

European Commission (2014). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions towards a circular economy: a zero waste programme for Europe. /*COM/2014/0398 final*/. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0398&from=EN

European I. P. P. C. Bureau (2007). European Commission. Reference document on best available techniques in the Ceramic Manufacturing Industry. Retrieved from: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/cer_bref_0807.pdf

Eurostat (2015). Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Material_flow_accounts_statistics_-_material_footprints).

Featherston, C. R., & Doolan, M. (2012, July). A critical review of the criticisms of system dynamics. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, St. Gallen, Switzerland (pp. 22-26).

Feijen, A. (2003). Ontwikkeling van Conceptoplossingen voor overlastproblemen bij renovatieprojecten. Project Innovation 4 Renovation- Deel 2, TNO.

Fernández, J. (2006). Material architecture: emergent materials for innovative buildings and ecological construction. Taylor & Francis.

Fernández, J. E. (2007). Resource consumption of new urban construction in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 99-115.

Ferrão, P., & Fernández, J. E. (2013). Sustainable urban metabolism. MIT Press.

Ferraresi, P. European waste policy: prevention a dream? Retrieved from: http://www.ekonomiaspoleczna.pl/files/ekonomiaspoleczna.pl/public/gk/01cluster/GKES_cluster_reuse_EU_waste_policy.pdf

Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2002). Exploring the history of industrial metabolism. A handbook of industrial ecology, 16.

Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (2007). Conceptualizing, observing and comparing socioecological transitions. Socioecological transitions and global change: Trajectories of social metabolism and land use, 1-30.

Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Weisz, H. (1999). Society as hybrid between material and symbolic realms: Toward a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Advances in human ecology, 8, 215-252.

Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society's metabolism: the intellectual history of materials flow analysis, Part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 61-78.

Fischer-Kowalski, Marina and Wanter Hüttler (1999), “Society’s metabolism: The intellectual history of material flow analysis, part II, 1970–1998”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), 107–36.

Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Mayer, A., Bringezu, S., ... & Weisz, H. (2011). Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(6), 855-876.

Fishman, T., Schandl, H., & Tanikawa, H. (2015). The socio-economic drivers of material stock accumulation in Japan's prefectures. Ecological Economics, 113, 76-84.

Folke, C., F. ,Berkes, F. and Colding, J. (1998). Ecological practices and social mechanisms for building resilience and sustainability. Pages 414–436 .In F. Berkes and C. Folke, editors. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Fonseca, M. (2010). Forest product conversion factors for the UNECE Region. Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Papers, (49).

Gardner, J. T., and Cooper, M. C. (2003). Strategic supply chain mapping approaches. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(2), 37-64.

Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 1(1), 24-40.

Georgiadis, P., and Athanasiou, E. (2013). Flexible long-term capacity planning in closed-loop supply chains with remanufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 44-58.

Georgiadis, P., and Besiou, M. (2008). Sustainability in electrical and electronic equipment closed-loop supply chains: a system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1665-1678.

Geyer, R., & Jackson, T. (2004). Supply loops and their constraints: the industrial ecology of recycling and reuse. California Management Review, 46(2), 55-73.

Geyer, R., Van Wassenhove, L. N., & Atasu, A. (2007). The economics of remanufacturing under limited component durability and finite product life cycles. Management science, 53(1), 88-100.

Gielen, D. J. (1997). Building materials and CO2: Western European emission reduction strategies. ECN Energy Research Center of the Netherlands.

Giglio, F. (2002). Controlling environmental impacts in the dismantling phase. In CIB Conference Design For Deconstruction And Materials Reuse, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Giljum, S., Dittrich, M., Bringezu, S., Polzin, C., & Lutter, S. (2010). Resource use and resource productivity in Asia. Vienna, Austria: Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI).

Girardet, H. (1999). The metabolism of cities. The sustainable urban development reader, 125-132. In S. M. Wheeler & T. Beatley (Eds.), The sustainable urban development reader. London, New York, Canada: Routledge (2004).

Girardet, H. (1990). The metabolism of cities. In: Cadman, D., Payne, G. (Eds.), The Living City: Towards a Sustainable Future, Routledge, London, UK, pp. 170–180.

Gommans, L. (1990). Hergebruik bouwmaterialen, met name baksteen: Studie naar de hergebruikmogelijkheden van bouwmterialen, toegespitst op die van baksteen. (Monografieën milieuplanning, 6) Delft: Technische Universiteit Delft, Faculteit der Bouwkunde.

Gordon, G. (1978). System simulation (2d ed. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Gorgolewski, M. (2006). The implications of reuse and recycling for the design of steel buildings. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(4), 489-496.

Gorgolewski, M. (2008)a. Designing with reused building components: some challenges. Building Research & Information, 36(2), 175-188.

Gorgolewski, M. (2008)b. Mountain Equipment Co-op in Ottawa Canada. Department of Architectural Science, Ryerson University. Retrieved from: http://www.reuse-steel.org/files/projects/MEC/MEC%20case%20study%205-5.pdf

Gorgolewski, M.T. and Morettin, L. (2009). The process of designing with reused building components. CIB115 Construction Materials Stewardship International Conference and annual meeting, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Gort, R. et al. (2007). No flat Future. Setrenovem, Utrecht.

Goverse, T., Hekkert, M. P., Groenewegen, P., Worrell, E., Smits, R. E. (2001). Wood innovation in the residential construction sector; opportunities and constraints. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 34(1), 53-74.

Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., Kannan, D. (2015). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 603-626.

Graedel, T., & Allenby, B. (2010). Industrial ecology and sustainable engineering. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Graedel, T., & Howard-Grenville, J. (2005). Greening the industrial facility: perspectives, approaches, and tools. Springer, New York.

Green, K., Morton, B., & New, S. (2000). Greening organizations: Purchasing, consumption, and innovation. Organization & Environment, 13(2), 206-225.

Grinberg, D., & Bakema, J. (1982). Housing in the netherlands 1900-1940. Delft: Delft University Press.

Guide, V.D.R., Jr. , van Wassenhove, L.N. , Ayres, R.U. , Ayres, L.W. (2002). Closed-loop supply chains. A Handbook of Industrial Ecology, Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited , 497-509.

Guide, V.D.R., Jr., Jayaraman, V., Srivastava, R., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Supply-chain management for recoverable manufacturing systems. Interfaces, 30(3), 125-142.

Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 31(1), 425-439.

Guttman, R. H., Moukas, A. G., & Maes, P. (1998). Agent-mediated electronic commerce: A survey. The Knowledge Engineer-ing Review, 13(2), 147-159.

Guy, B., Shell, S., & Esherick, H. (2006). Design for deconstruction and materials reuse. Proceedings of the CIB Task Group, 39(4), 189-209.

Haberl, H., & Geissler, S. (2000). Cascade utilization of biomass: strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource. Eco-logical Engineering, 16, 111-121.

Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2004). Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 199-213.

Habraken, N. J. (2003). Open Building as a condition for industrial construction. Paper presented at the 20th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Hammond, G. P., & Jones, C. I. (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy, 161(2), 87-98.

Hardin, G. (1991). Paramount positions in ecological economics. In R. Costanza, (Ed.). Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability, pp. 47–57. New York: Columbia University Press.

Hargreaves, D. (Ed.) (2005). The Global Cement Report, Tradeship Publications, Surrey.

Hashimoto, S., Moriguchi, Y., Saito, A., & Ono, T. (2004). Six indicators of material cycles for describing society’s metabolism: application to wood resources in Japan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 40(3), 201-223.

Hashimoto, S., Tanikawa, H., & Moriguchi, Y. (2007). Where will large amounts of materials accumulated within the economy go?–A material flow analysis of construction minerals for Japan. Waste Management, 27(12), 1725-1738.

Hashimoto, S., Tanikawa, H., & Moriguchi, Y. (2009). Framework for estimating potential wastes and secondary resources ac-cumulated within an economy–A case study of construction minerals in Japan. Waste Management, 29(11), 2859-2866.

Hasselaar, E. (2001). Hoe gezond is de Nederlandse woning?. Delft: DUP Science.

Hasselaar, E. and Van Battum, M. T. A. (2004). Levensduur Van Bestande Woningen. In Bouwen Met Tijd. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu_ VROM. Retrieved from: http://www.slimbouwen.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Bouwen%20met%20tijd.pdf

Hemström, K. et al. (2012). Characterisation of supply chain for reused building components in Europe. Retrieved from: http://wikia.ircow.eu/index.php/Characterisation_of_supply_chain_for_reused_building_components_in_Europe

Hendriks, C. F., & Janssen, G. M. T. (2001). Construction and demolition waste: general process aspects. Heron, 46(2), 79-87.

Hendriks, C. F., & Pietersen, H. S. (Eds.). (2000). Report 22: Sustainable Raw Materials: Construction and Demolition Waste. RILEM Publications, France.

Hendriks, C., Obernosterer, R., Müller, D., Kytzia, S., Baccini, P., & Brunner, P. H. (2000). Material flow analysis: a tool to support environmental policy decision making. Case-studies on the city of Vienna and the Swiss lowlands. Local Environment, 5(3), 311-328.

Hendriks, I. C. F., & Raad, J. S. (1997). Report: Principles and background of the Building Materials Decree in the Nether-lands. Materials and Structures, 30(1), 3-10.

Hendriks, C.F. (1998). Application of Aggregates Out of Construction: and Demolition Waste in Road Constructions and Concrete. CIB World Building Congress Construction and Environment, Gävle, Sweden (1998), pp. 211-222

Herczeg, M., et al. (2014). Resource efficiency in the building sector. Final report. Prepared for European Commission. ECORYS and Copenhagen Resource Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/Resource%20efficiency%20in%20the%20building%20sector.pdf

Hertwich, E. (2010). Assessing the environmental impacts of consumption and production: priority products and materials. UNEP/Earthprint.

Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Johnson, R. B. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford University Press.

Heun, M. K., Carbajales-Dale, M., & Haney, B. R. (2015). Accounting for the Wealth of Nations. In Beyond GDP (pp. 23-43). Springer, Cham.

Heynen, Nikolas C., Maria Kaika, and Erik Swyngedouw, eds. (2006). In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. Vol. 3. Taylor & Francis.

Hiete, M., Stengel, J., Ludwig, J., & Schultmann, F. (2011). Matching construction and demolition waste supply to recycling demand: a regional management chain model. Building Research & Information, 39(4), 333-351.

Hilderink, H. B. M., Den Otter, H., & De Jong, A. (2005). Scenario's voor huishoudensontwikkelingen in Nederland. Retrieved from: http://www.mnp.nl/duurzameontwikkeling/demografie

Hinterberger, F., Giljum, S., Hammer, M. (2002). Material flow accounting and analysis (MFA): a valuable tool for analyses of society–nature interrelationships. In SERI-Backgroundpaper 2/2003 published in The Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecolog-ical Economics. Retrieved from: http://www.ecologicaleconomics.org/publica/encyc.htm)

Hobbs, G., Hurley, J. (2001). Deconstruction and the reuse of construction materials. Deconstruction and Material Reuse: Technology, Economic and Policy, Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 - Deconstruction Meeting, CIB World Building Congress, CIB Publication 266, Wellington, New Zealand (2001), pp. 98-124.

Hoekstra, R. (2010). Physical Input–Output Tables: Developments and Future. Paper prepared for the 18th International In-put-Output Conference (pp. 20-25), Sydney, Australia.

Hofstra, U., et al. (2006) Scenariostudie BSA-Granulaten, Aanbod En Afzet van 2005 Tot 2025. Delft: Rijkswaterstaat.

Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 4(1), 1-23.

Holmes, T., & Pincetl, S. (2012). UCLA Institute of the Environment Urban Metabolism Literature Review Winter 2012.

Hoogers , A., Gelinck, S., Trabsky, W., van Luijk, P., Kortman, J. (2004). Levensduur Van Bestande Woningen. In Bouwen Met Tijd. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu. Retrieved from: http://www.slimbouwen.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Bouwen%20met%20tijd.pdf

Houseknecht, M., Kim, C., & Whitman, A. (2006). Material flows on the island of Hawai’i. The Kohala Center, Hilo, HI, USA. The Kohala Center.30p.

Hsiao, T. Y., Huang, Y. T., Yu, Y. H., & Wernick, I. K. (2002). Modeling materials flow of waste concrete from construction and demolition wastes in Taiwan. Resources Policy, 28(1-2), 39-47.

Hu, M. (2010). Dynamic material flow analysis to support sustainable built environment development: with case studies on Chinese housing stock dynamics. (Thesis Instititute of Environmental Sciences, CML Leiden University).

Institute For European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Ecologic, Arcadis, Umweltbundesamt, Bio Intelligence Services, Vito (2010). Supporting The Thematic Strategy On Waste Prevention And Recycling. Final Report. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/Final%20Report%20final%2025%20Oct.pdf

Itard, L., & Klunder, G. (2007). Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction. Build-ing Research & Information, 35(3), 252-267.

Itard, L., Meijer, F., Vrins, E., & Hoiting, H. (2008). Building renovation and modernisation in Europe: state of the art re-view. Final Report ERABUILD, Technical University of Delft, 31.

Hu, M., Bergsdal, H., van der Voet, E., Huppes, G., & Müller, D. B. (2010). Dynamics of urban and rural housing stocks in China. Building Research & Information, 38(3), 301-317.

Hu, M., Van Der Voet, E., & Huppes, G. (2010). Dynamic material flow analysis for strategic construction and demolition waste management in Beijing. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(3), 440-456.

Huang, S. L., & Hsu, W. L. (2003). Materials flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei’s urban construction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(2), 61-74.

Huang, S. L., Lee, C. L., & Chen, C. W. (2006). Socioeconomic metabolism in Taiwan: emergy synthesis versus material flow analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 48(2), 166-196.

Huang, T., Shi, F., Tanikawa, H., Fei, J., & Han, J. (2013). Materials demand and environmental impact of buildings construction and demolition in China based on dynamic material flow analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 72, 91-101

Huffmeijer, F.J.M. and Damen, A. A. J. (1995), Levensduur van bouwprodukten: Praktijkwaarden. Rotterdam (Stichting Bouwresearch).

Hurley, James and Gilli Hobbs (2003). “TG39- UK Country Report on Deconstruction”. Deconstruction: Techniques, Economics, and Safety - Country Reports. eds. Charles J. Kibert, Abdol Chini and Charles Hendriks.

Hurley, J., Goodier, C., Garrod, E., Grantham, R., Lennon, T., & Waterman, A. (2002). Design for Deconstruction - Tools and Practices. In: CIB, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building Construction, editor. Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39, Karlsruhe, Germany, p. Paper 13.

Jackson, C., & Watkins, E. (2012). EU waste law: the challenge of better compliance. Directions in European Environmental Policy (IEEP), (5), 62.

Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption. Sustainable Development Research Network, 29, 30.

Jäger, F. P. (Ed.). (2010). Old & new: design manual for revitalizing existing buildings. Walter de Gruyter.

Jaillon, L., Poon, C. S., & Chiang, Y. H. (2009). Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste management, 29(1), 309-320.

Jansen, P.A.G. and Eppenga, R. (2000). Houtgebruik voor kozijnen in Nederland. Stichting Bos en Hout, Wageningen.

Janssen. G. M. T. (2005). “Recycling In The Construction Industry: Pro And Contra. Abstracts of Papers at 7th World Congress on Recovery, Recycling and Re-integration.

Johansson, A. (2002). Industrial ecology and industrial metabolism: use and misuse of metaphors. R.U. Ayres, L. Ayres (Eds.), A handbook of industrial ecology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2002), pp. 70-78.

Johnson, J., Reck, B. K., Wang, T., & Graedel, T. E. (2008). The energy benefit of stainless steel recycling. Energy policy, 36(1), 181-192.

Jonkers, I. (2011). “Onderzoek naar kwalitatieve verbetering van het hergebruik van hout in de Nederlandse markt.” Inhoudelijke verslaglegging Fase 1, aanzet voor Fase 2. Nyenrode CfS, Breukelen.

Kalmykova, Y., Rosado, L., & Patrício, J. (2016). Resource consumption drivers and pathways to reduction: economy, policy and lifestyle impact on material flows at the national and urban scale. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 70-80.

Thornton, K. and Essex, J. (2009). Pushing Re-use: towards a Low-carbon Construction Industry. Bioregional. Retrieved from: https://bioregional.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/PushingReuse.pdf

Kazmierczyk P et al (2016). More from less: material resource efficiency in Europe; 2015 overview of policies, instruments and targets in 32 countries. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Kemp, R. (2006). An Example of a ‘Managed Transition’: The Transformation of the Waste Management Subsystem in the Netherlands 1960–2000. In Sustainability and Innovation, ed. M. Lehmann Waffenschmidt. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag HD.

Kemp, R., & van Lente, H. (2011). The dual challenge of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 121-124.

Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of industrial ecology, 11(2), 43-59.

Kennedy, C., Pincetl, S., & Bunje, P. (2011). The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and de-sign. Environmental pollution, 159(8), 1965-1973.

Kennedy, C., Steinberger, J., Gasson, B., Hansen, Y., Hillman, T., Havránek, M., ... & Mendez, G. V. (2010). Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Energy policy, 38(9), 4828-4837.

Kennedy, C., Stewart, I. D., Ibrahim, N., Facchini, A., & Mele, R. (2014). Developing a multi-layered indicator set for urban metabolism studies in megacities. Ecological Indicators, 47, 7-15.

Keys, P. (1990). System dynamics as a systems-based problem-solving methodology. Systems practice, 3(5), 479-493.

Kibert, C. J. (2000). Implementing deconstruction in Florida: Materials reuse issues, disassembly techniques, economics and policy, Florida Center for Solid and Hazardouse Waste.

Kibert, C. J., & Chini, A. R. (2000). Overview of deconstruction in selected countries. In CIB Publication (Vol. 252).

Kibert, C. J. (2001) “Policy Instruments for Sustainable Built Environment.” Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law 01/2001; 17:379.

Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons.

Kilbourne, W. E., & Beckmann, S. C. (1998). Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 513-532.

Kirchner, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Re-sources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232.

Kirchner, J., Leduc, G., Goodland, R., & Drake, J. (1985). Carrying capacity, population growth, and sustainable development. In D. Mahar (Ed.).Rapid population growth and human carrying capacity: Two perspectives. Staff Working Papers #690, Population and Development Series. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Klang, A., Vikman, P. Å., & Brattebø, H. (2003). Sustainable management of demolition waste—an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 38(4), 317-334.

Kleijn, R., Huele, R., & Van Der Voet, E. (2000). Dynamic substance flow analysis: the delaying mechanism of stocks, with the case of PVC in Sweden. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 241-254.

Klunder, G. (2005). Sustainable solutions for Dutch housing: reducing the environmental impacts of new and existing houses (Thesis, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology).

Klunder, G., & Van Nunen, H. (2003). The factor of time in the life cycle assessment of housing. Open House International, 28(1), 20-27.

Kohler, N., & Hassler, U. (2002). The building stock as a research object. Building Research & Information, 30(4), 226-236.

Koops, O. and Manshanden, W. (2006). “Ontwikkelingen in de woningvoorraad in Nederland, de G30-steden en de 56 Prioriteitswijken. TNO rapport 2006-D-R0004/A, Delft.

Koppert, Hielke (2012). " Environmental protection expenditures of households home improvement.” Final report, Statistisch Onderzoeker, Team/ Milieu.

Korhonen, J. (2004). Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model: strategic applications of industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(8-10), 809-823.

Krausmann, F., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Schandl, H., & Eisenmenger, N. (2008). The global sociometabolic transition. Journal of Industrial ecology, 12(5-6), 637-656.

Kristinsson, J., Hendriks, C. F., Kowalczyk, T., & Dorsthorst, B. J. H. (2001). Reuse of secondary elements: utopia or reality. In Proceedings of World CIB Conference 2001 paper No: NOV55.

Krutwagen, B, and van Broekhuizen, F. (2010). Milieuanalyses Bouw- en sloopafval. Ten behoeve van prioritaire stromen ketengericht afvalbeleid. Eindrapport. IVAM.

Kuikka, S. (2012). LCA of the Demolition of a Building-An assessment conducted at IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.

Kvale, S. (1996) "An introdution to qualitative research interviewing." California: Sage Publications/Thousand Oaks.

MacArthur, Ellen. (2013). "Towards the circular economy." Ellen Macarthur Foundation, Isle of Wight, UK, Vol. 1.

Martin, B., & Simintiras, A. C. (1995). The impact of green product lines on the environment: does what they know affect how they feel?. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 13(4), 16-23.

Matthews, E., Amann, C., Bringezu, S., Hüttler, W., Ottke, C., Rodenburg, E., ... & Weisz, H. (2000). The weight of nations-material outflows from industrial economies. In World Resources Institute.

Maxwell, J. A. (2011). Paradigms or toolkits? Philosophical and methodological positions as heuristics for mixed methods research. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 24(2), 27-30.

Mazahir, S., Lassagne, M., & Kerbache, L. (2011). Reverse logistics and push-pull manufacturing systems: The case of electronic products. In Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal (Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 92-103). Taylor & Francis.

McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2010). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.

McGrath, C., Hurley, J., Fletcher, S.L. and Bowes, H.M. (2000) “UK Market Share Report—Deconstruction and Reuse of Construction Materials,” Report No 81467, DETR, UK.

McLear, K., & Nobe, M. C. (2011). Return on Investment for Non-Profit Deconstruction. 47th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings. Associated Schools of Construction. Retrieved from: http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2011/paper/CPGT361002011.pdf

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York, 102, 27.

Meijer, A. (2006). Improvement of the life cycle assessment methodology for dwellings. IOS Press.

Meijer, F. M., & Thomsen, A. F. (2006). Kwaliteit van de particuliere woningvoorraad. Habiforum.

Mellor, W., Wright, E., Clift, R., Azapagic, A., & Stevens, G. (2002). A mathematical model and decision-support framework for material recovery, recycling and cascaded use. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(22-23), 4697-4713.

Menegaki, M. E., & Kaliampakos, D. C. (2010). European aggregates production: Drivers, correlations and trends. Resources policy, 35(3), 235-244.

Merl, A. D., Humar, M., Okstad, T., Picardo, V., Ribeiro, A., & Steirer, F. (2007). Amounts of recovered wood in cost E31 countries and Europe. In C. Gallis (Ed.), Management of recovered wood: Reaching a higher technical, economic and environmental standard in Europe Thessaloniki. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.

Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (2010). Cijfers over Wonen, Wijken en Integratie 2010. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.

Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (2013). Cijfers over Wonen en Bouwen 2013. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.

Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (2016). Cijfers over Wonen en Bouwen 2016. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.

Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu (2014). VANG. Bijlage 1 bij de kamerbrief Invulling programma Van Afval Naar Grondstof. Van Afval Naar Grondstof. Uitwerking van acht operationele doelstellingen, Den Haag.

Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu_ VROM (1997). “Bouwprognoses 1996–2001.” The Hague, The Netherlands.

Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu_ VROM (2000). "De kwaliteit van de Nederlandse woning en woonomgeving rond de millenniumwisseling; basisrapportage Kwalitatieve Woningregistratie 2000”. Retrieved from: http://www. vrom.nl/infowonen/docs/De% 20kwaliteit% 20van% 20de% 20Nederlandse 20 (2003).

Ministerie van Volkshuisveting, Ruimtelijk Ordening en Milieu_ VROM (1990). “De gevolgen van substitutie van tropisch hardhout in de woning- en utiliteitsbouw.”The Hague, The Netherlands.

Ministerie van Volkshuisveting, Ruimtelijk Ordening en Milieu_ VROM (2006). “Kernpublicatie WoON Energie 2006”. Retrieved from: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2010/03/11/kernpublicatie-woon-energie-2006

Ministerie van Volkshuivesting Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu_ VROM (2010)a. “Landelijk afvalbeheerplan 2009-2021. Naar een materiaalketenbeleid”.

Ministerie van Volkshuivesting Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu_ VROM (2010)b. “Getting Ahead with a Successful Chain Approach.” The Hague, The Netherlands.

Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment and the Ministry of Economic Affairs, also on behalf of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. (2016). “A Circular Economy in the Netherlands by 2050. Government-wide Programme for a Circular Economy.”

Moffatt, S., & Kohler, N. (2008). Conceptualizing the built environment as a social–ecological system. Building research & information, 36(3), 248-268.

Moll, S., Popescu, C., & Nickel, R. (2012). EU's Resource Productivity on the increase. Eurostat. Statistics in Focus, 22, 2012. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3433488/5584760/KS-SF-12-022-EN.PDF/0fcda682-ebc6-448e-9a25-f46b1aeb15b9

Moors, P. G. G. (1991). Duurzaam bouwen en verschuivingen in de toepassing van bouwproducten: Een verkennend onderzoek onder toeleveringsbedrijven, architectenbureaus en uitvoerende bouwbedrijven. Volkshuisvestingsbeleid bouwmarkt 12.

Mulder, E. (2008). “Kringbouw - Naar een duurzame grondstofvoorziening in de bouw.” TNO SenterNovem.

Müller, D. B. (2006). Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows—Case study for housing in The Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 59(1), 142-156.

Müller, D. B., Bader, H. P., & Baccini, P. (2004). Long-term coordination of timber production and consumption using a dynamic material and energy flow analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(3), 65-88.

Müller, E., Hilty, L. M., Widmer, R., Schluep, M., & Faulstich, M. (2014). Modeling metal stocks and flows: A review of dynamic material flow analysis methods. Environmental science & technology, 48(4), 2102-2113.

Nakajima, S., & Murakami, T. (2010). Comparison of two structural reuse options of two-by-four salvaged lumbers. In Proceedings of the WCTE 2010-World Conference on Timber Engineering. Riva del Garda (Italy) (pp. 20-24).

Nederlandse Vereninging Van Banken (2014). The Dutch Mortgage Market. Retrieved from: https://www.nvb.nl/publicaties/rapporten-verslagen-brochures/1970/the-dutch-mortgage-market.html

Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of political economy, 78(2), 311-329.

Nelson, R. R. (1995). Co–evolution of industry structure, technology and supporting institutions, and the making of comparative advantage. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2(2), 171-184.

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.

Newman, P. W. (1999). Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. Landscape and urban planning, 44(4), 219-226.

Nie, Z., Yang, Z., Fang, Y., Yang, Y., Tang, Z., Wang, X., ... & Huang, Q. (2015). Environmental risks of HBCDD from construction and demolition waste: a contemporary and future issue. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(21), 17249-17252.

Nightingale, J. (1978). On the Definition of Industry'andMarket'. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 31-40.

Nordby, A. S., Berge, B., Hakonsen, F., & Hestnes, A. G. (2009)a. Criteria for salvageability: the reuse of bricks. Building Re-search & Information, 37(1), 55-67.

Nordby, A.S., Wigum, K.S., Berge, B. (2009)b. Developing the Stavne Timber Block - Life cycle design in practice. Proceeding of CIB W115 Construction Material Stewardship, Lifecycle Design of Buildings, Systems and Materials

Norris, M., & Shiels, P. (2004). Regular National Report on housing developments in European countries: Synthesis re-port. Stationery Office.

Novem (2001). Referentiewoningen bestaande bouw. CE, Delft, The Netherlands.

Noy, D. and Maessen, H. (2011). Jellema deel 8 Bouwmethoden Woningbouw. ThiemeMeulenhoff.

O'Brien, E., Guy, B., & Lindner, A. S. (2006). Life cycle analysis of the deconstruction of military barracks: Ft. McClellan, Anniston, AL. Journal of Green Building, 1(4), 166-183.

O'Donoghue, T., & Punch, K. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative educational research in action: Doing and reflecting. Routledge.

Odegard, I. Y. R., Croezen, H. J., & Bergsma, G. C. (2012). Cascading of Biomass: 13 Solutions for a Sustainable Bio-based Economy: Making Better Choices for Use of Biomass Residues, By-products and Wastes. CE Delft.

OECD (2004). Towards waste prevention performance indicators. OECD Environmental Directorate. Working group on waste prevention and recycling and working group on environmental information and outlooks.

OECD (2008)a Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Volume 1. The OECD Guide. OECD Paris.

OECD (2008)b. Measuring material flows and resource productivity: Volume 2. The accounting framework. OECD Paris.

Ogbu, L. (2010). Design for reuse primer. Public Architecture.

Oldenburger, J., de Groot, C., Winterink, A., & van Benthem, M. (2015). Duurzaam geproduceerd hout op de Nederlandse markt in 2013. Stichting Probos.

Oldenburger, J., Winterink, A., & de Groot, C. (2015). Duurzaam geproduceerd hout op de Nederlandse markt in 2011. Stichting Probos.

Oldenburger, J., Winterink, A., & Leek, N. (2010). Duurzaam geproduceerd hout op de Nederlandse markt in 2008. Sticht-ing Probos.

Oosterhoff, J. (1990). Kracht en vorm: De draagconstructie van bouwwerken eenvoudig verklaard. Oosterhuis, F. H., Bartelings, H., Linderhof, V. G., & van Beukering, P. J. (2009). Economic instruments and waste policies in the Netherlands-Inventory and options for extended use. IVM report (R-09/01). Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University, Am-sterdam, the Netherlands.

Ortiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2009). Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 28-39.

Oswald, F., Baccini, P., & Michaeli, M. (2003). Netzstadt. Springer Science & Business Media

Oudejans, J., Colthoff, J. K., de Vlugt, M., Valk, M. & S. Geraedts (2011) “Eindrapport. Onderzoek naar potentie hoogwaardig hergebruik bouw- en sloopafval Amsterdam”, University of Utrecht. Retrieved from: http://cache.duurzaamgebouwd.nl/upload/dg_8fd9sluf/files/pdf/eindrapport_uu_potentie_hoogwaardig_hergebruik_steenachtige_fracties_amsterdam.pdf

Pacheco-Torgal, F., Cabeza, L. F., Labrincha, J., & De Magalhaes, A. G. (2014). Eco-efficient construction and building mate-rials: life cycle assessment (LCA), eco-labelling and case studies. Woodhead Publishing.

Pacheco-Torgal, F., Fucic, A. . Jalali, S. (2012). Toxicity of building materials. Woodhead Publishing Limited Abington Hall, Cambridge, UK.

Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Murthy, N. N. (2007). The supply chain implications of recycling. Business Horizons, 50(2), 133-143.

Park, M. S. (2013) Reusing Brick: Properties of Brick to Mortar Bond Strength, Columbia University Academic Commons, https://doi.org/10.7916/D832032S.

Parker, D., & Butler, P. (2007). An Introduction to Remanufacturing. Aylesbury. Center for Remanufacturing and Reuse. Retrieved from: www.remanufacturing.org.uk/pdf/reman_primer.pdf.

Patel, A. (2010). Strengthening The Business Case Of Reuse. WellMet 2050 Working paper 4. University of Cambridge.

Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: behavior and norms. Annual review of environment and resources, 35. 35 (1), 195-228

Pedersen, O. G., & Haan, M. (2006). The system of environmental and economic accounts—2003 and the economic relevance of physical flow accounting. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1-2), 19-42.

Pepke, E. (2010). Forest Products Annual Market Review 2009-2010 (No. 25). United Nations Publications.

Perkins, R., 2003. Technological “lock-in”. Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics, p. 1).

Persoon, J. (2011). “Energiebesparingsmogelijkheden bestaande woningen: uitwerkingsinstructie op basis van toolkitconcepten.” SBR and ISSO.

Peters, C. (2011). “Rightsizing Community Deconstruction Development.” State University of New York College of Environ-mental Science & Forestry. BMRA conference.

Phillips, A. (1971). Technology and market structure: A study of the aircraft industry. Heath Lexington Books.

Pietersen, H. S. (2000). Application of Recycled Aggregates in the European Concrete Industry_ its current status and Future Outlook. TUDelft. ICONDA CIB 4806. Retrieved from: http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB2973.pdf

Plinke, E., Wenk, N., Wolff, G., Castiglione, D. & Palmark, M. (2000). “Mechanical recycling for PVC Wastes. Final Report.” Study for DG XI of the European Commission (B43040/98/000821/ MAR/ E3). Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/pvc/mech_recylce.pdf

Poelman, W.A. (2009). Supply Driven Architecture (SDA). In Lifecycle Design of Buildings, Proceedings of the Systems and Materials: CIB W115 Construction Material Stewardship, Enschede, The Netherlands, 12–15 June 2009; Durmišević, E., Ed.; International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 110–117.

Porter, E. (2007). Understanding Industry Structure. Harvard Business School Background Note 707 - 49 3, December 2006. (Revised August 2007.)

Priemus, H. (1980). Volkshuisvesting in de verdrukking : Kritische notities over het nederlandse woonbeleid. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom.

Probos (2008). “Kerngegevens Bos en Hout in Nederland, 2008”, Stichting Probos, Wageningen.

Probos (2011). “Kerngegevens Bos en Hout in Nederland, 2011”, Stichting Probos, Wageningen.

Pun, S. K., Liu, C., Langston, C., Treloar, G., & Itoh, Y. (2006). Promoting the reuse and recycling of building demolition materials. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 5(1), 195.

Quinn, D. J. (2008). Modeling the resource consumption of housing in New Orleans using System Dynamics (Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Quinn, D., & Fernández, J. E. (2010). Estimating material usage of road infrastructure in US cities. Proceedings of SimBuild, 4(1), 365-376.

Quinn, K. E. (2010). Improving the Feasibility of building Deconstruction and Adaptability (Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Radzicki, M. J., & Tauheed, L. (2009). In defense of system dynamics: A response to professor hayden. Journal of Economic Issues, 43(4), 1043-1061.

Randers, J. (1980). Guidelines for model conceptualization. Elements of the system dynamics method, 117, 139.

Rees, W. E. (1996). Revisiting carrying capacity: area-based indicators of sustainability. Population and environment, 17(3), 195-215.

Richardson, G. P. (1986). Problems with causal-loop diagrams. System dynamics review, 2(2), 158-170.

Rijkswaterstaat (2014). Afvalverwerking in Nederland: gegevens 2013. Rijkswaterstaat.Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu. Werkgroep Afvalregistratie, Utrecht.

Ritchie J Spencer L. (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.) Analysing qualitative data. London Routledge.

Roders, M. J., & van Gassel, F. J. M. (2004). Samenvatting symposium IFD Bouwen In Japan, Amerika en Europa. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 14 pp.

Roper, W. E. (2006). Strategies for building material reuse and recycle. International journal of environmental technology and management, 6(3-4), 313-345.

Roth, L. (2005). Reuse of construction materials: Environmental performance and assessment methodology (Thesis, Institutionen för konstruktions-och produktionsteknik).

Roussat, N., Méhu, J., Abdelghafour, M., & Brula, P. (2008). Leaching behaviour of hazardous demolition waste. Waste Management, 28(11), 2032-2040.

Sára, B., Antonini, E., & Tarantini, M. (2001, February). Application of life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology for valorization of building demolition materials and products. In Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing (Vol. 4193, pp. 382-391). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

Sartori, I., Bergsdal, H., Müller, D. B., & Brattebø, H. (2008). Towards modelling of construction, renovation and demolition activities: Norway's dwelling stock, 1900–2100. Building Research & Information, 36(5), 412-425.

Sassi, P. (2008). Defining closed-loop material cycle construction. Building Research & Information, 36(5), 509-519.

Schmidt-Bleek, F. (2003). The Fossil Makers, Factor 10 Institute, Ch. 4, 100–108.

Schmidt, J. H., Merciai, S., Delahaye, R., Vuik, J., Heijungs, R., de Koning, A., & Sahoo, A. (2014). Recommendation of terminology, classification, framework of waste accounts and MFA, and data collection guideline. CREEA deliverable D, 4.

Schoonvelde, G. J. (
How to Cite
ICIBACI, Loriane. Re-use of Building Products in the Netherlands. A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment, [S.l.], n. 2, p. 1-422, jan. 2019. ISSN 2214-7233. Available at: <https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/abe/article/view/3248>. Date accessed: 19 july 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2019.2.3248.
Published
2019-01-02