Epithetische apposities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25609/sure.v1.1053Abstract
Epithetische apposities worden vergeleken met attribu-tieve nominale apposities en parenthetische depictieven wat betreft hun gedrag, distributie, vereiste vorm en status van het anker en relatie met constituenten in de gastheerzin. Het blijkt dat epithetische apposities en parenthetische depictieven een vrijere distributie hebben dan nominale apposities. De belangrijkste conclusie is dan ook dat epithetische apposities niet alleen dezelfde distributie maar vermoedelijk ook een vergelijkbare onderliggende constructie hebben als parenthetische depictieven, en dat ze zodoende bestaan uit een niet-uitgesproken pronomen PRO plus het epitheton. Boven-dien blijken de beperkingen op de distributie van apposi-ties niet zozeer syntactisch maar eerder pragmatisch van aard.References
Dehé, N. (2014). Parentheticals in spoken English. The syntax-prosody relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kluck, M., Ott, D. & De Vries, M. (2014). Incomplete parenthesis: an overview. In M. Kluck, D. Ott & M. de Vries (Eds.), Parenthesis and ellipsis. Cross-linguistic and theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-21). Berlin: De Gruyter/ Mouton.
Griffiths, J. (2015). On appositives. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen (2015). (LOT Dissertation Series 389).
Kluck, M. (2015). On representing anchored parentheses in syntax. In A. Trotzke, J. Bayer (Eds.), Syntactic complexity across interfaces (pp. 107-136). Berlin: De Gruyter/Mouton.
Heringa, H. (2011b). Appositional constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen (2012). (LOT Dissertation Series 294).
De Groot, C. (2008). Depictive secondary predication in Hungarian. In Schroeder, C., Hentschel, G. & Broeder, W. (Eds.), Secondary predicates in eastern European languages and beyond (pp. 69-96). Oldenburg.
Heringa, H. (2010). Depictives and the word orders of English and Dutch. In J.W. Zwart & M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure preserved, studies in syntax for Jan Koster (pp. 157-165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Müller-Bardey, T. (2005). Adverbials and depictives as restrictors. In Himmelmann, N.P. & Schultze-Berndt, E.F. (Eds.), Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives (pp. 107- 140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schultze-Berndt, E. & Himmelmann, N.P. (2004). Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic typology 8, 59-131.
Schultze-Berndt, E. & Himmelmann, N.P. (2005). Secondary predication and adverbial modification: the typology of depictives. Oxford University Press.
Corazza, E. (2005). On epithets qua attributive anaphors. Journal of linguistics 41(1): 1-32.
Dubinsky, S. & Hamilton, R. (1998). Epithets as antilogophoric pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4), 685-693.
Jackendoff, R.S. (1969). Some rules of semantic
interpretation for English. Ph.D dissertation, MIT (1969).
Jackendoff, R.S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Patel-Grosz, P. (2014). Epithets as de re pronouns. Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 10, 91-106.
Postal, P.M. (1972). Pronominal epithets and similar items. Foundations of language 9:2, 246-248.
Kavalova, Y. (2007). And-parenthetical clauses. In N. Dehé & Y. Kavalova (Eds.), Parentheticals (pp. 145- 172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106).
Heringa, H. (2011a). A multidominance approach to appositional constructions. Lingua 122, 554-581.
De Vries, M. (2007). Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In N. Dehé & Y. Kavalova (Eds.), Parentheticals (pp. 203-234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) license and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page.
