Influencing Sustainable Mobility with Social Influence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25609/sure.v1.1047Abstract
This paper explores how a socio-psychological approach strengthened with social influence theory can contribute to attaining sustainable mobility by evaluating four mobility projects in the Netherlands as a response to the lack of that approach in Dutch planning practice. Findings indicate that social influence can contribute effectively to current mobility approaches. Social influence is activated when either social proof is triggered through descriptive social norms or when commitment is triggered through competitions with financial incentives.References
Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), pp. 73-80.
Beter Benutten(2013). Grip op gedrag. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.
Cialdini, R. (2013). Influence: Science and Practice. 5th Edition Harlow: Pearson.
Dijst, M., Rietveld, P., Steg, L. (2013). ‘Individual needs, opportunities and travel behaviour: a multidisciplinary perspective based on psychology, economics and geography’. in Van Wee, B., Annema, J.A., Banister, D. The transport system and transport policy. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham, UK. pp. 19 - 47
Meurs, H. (2002). Duurzaam koersen op tijd. Zwolle: Novem.
Rietveld, P. and Stough, RR. (2004) Barriers to Sustainable Transport: Institutions, Regulation and Sustainability. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
De Witte, A., Hollevoet, J., Dobruszkes, F., Hubert, M. and Macharis, C. (2013). Linking modal choice to motility: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, pp. 329-34
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) license and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page.