Exploring the Possibility of Using Bioreceptive Concrete in Building Façades
Keywords:Bioreceptivity, biofilm, concrete façade panel
A bioreceptive material allows for biological content (biofilms) to grow on it, without necessarily affecting
the material itself. If a bioreceptive concrete could therefore be integrated into a building façade, it could
lead to green façades that do not need additional technical systems. As part of previous research by
the authors, a promising bioreceptive concrete mixture was formulated. The aim of this research is to
develop this concept by using the previously developed mixture to create a bioreceptive concrete façade
panel prototype, made using commonly available materials, that can direct where the biological growth
takes place. The latter is done by combining the bioreceptive concrete with a non-bioreceptive (UHPCbased) concrete in the same panel, through a two-stage pouring process. A biofilm was developed on this
prototype panel and results show that full coverage of the bioreceptive parts of the panel can be achieved
within two weeks under optimal growing conditions and biological growth can be directed. However,
exterior survivability is an issue for now. The concept of bioreceptive façades therefore shows promise,
yet further investigation into improving exterior survivability is necessary, while further research into the
underlying ecology, material, economics, and climate effects is also necessary.
Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic Cities Are Sustainable. Sustainability, 5(8), 3328-3345.
Charoenkit, S., & Yiemwattana, S. (2017). Role of specific plant characteristics on thermal and carbon sequestration properties of living walls in tropical climate. Building and Environment, 115, 67-79.
Freystein, K., Salisch, M., & Reisser, W. (2008). Algal biofilms on tree bark to monitor airborne. Biologica, 63(6), 866-872.
Gorbushina, A. A. (2007). Life on the rocks. Environmental Microbiology, 9(7), 1613-1631.
Guillitte, O. (1995). Bioreceptivity: a new concept for building ecology. Science of the Total Environment, 167(1-3), 215-220.
Guillitte, O. & Dreessen, R. (1995). Laboratory chamber studies and petrographical analysis as bioreceptivity assessment tools of building materials. Science of the Total Environment, 167(1-3), 365-374.
Johansson, O., Johansson, O., Giesler, R., & Palmqvist, K. (2011). Lichen responses to nitrogen and phosphorus additions can be explained by the different symbiont responses. New Phytologist, 191(3), 795-805. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03739.x
Jones, A. A., & Bennett, P. C. (2017). Mineral ecology: Surface specific colonization and geochemical drivers of Biofilm accumulation, composition, and phenology. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8(491).
Kleerekoper, L., Van Esch, M., & Salcedo, T. B. (2012). How to make a city climate-proof, addressing the urban heat island effect. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 64, 30-38.
Lai, L., & Cheng, W. (2010). Urban Heat Island and Air Pollution—An Emerging Role for Hospital Respiratory Admissions in an Urban Area. Journal of Environmental Health, 72(6), 32-36.
Li, W., & Yeung, K. (2014). A comprehensive study of green roof performance from environmental perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3(1), 127-134.
Mayaud, J. R., Viles, H. A., & Coombes, M. A. (2014). Exploring the influence of biofilm on short-term expansion and contraction of supratidal rock: An example from the Mediterranean. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(10), 1404-1412.
McCarthy, M. J., & Dyer, T. D. (2019). Pozzolanas and Pozzolanic Materials. In P. Hewlett, & M. Liska, Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete (5th ed., pp. 363-467). Oxford: Elsevier.
McKinney, M. L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11(2), 161-176.
Miller, A. Z., Leal, N., Laiz, L., Rogeiro-Candelera, M. A., Silva, R. J., Dionisio, A., . . . Saiz-Jimenez, C. (2010). Primary bioreceptivity of limestones used in southern European monuments. In B. J. Smith, M. Gomez-Heras, H. A. Víles, & C. J, Limestone in the Built Environment: Present-day Challenges for the Preservation of the Past (pp. 79-92). London: Geological Society.
Mindness, S. (2019). Resistance of Concrete to Destructive Agencies. In P. Hewlett, & M. Liska, Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete (5 ed., pp. 251-283). Oxford: Elsevier.
Mostert, E. S., & Grobbelaar, J. (1987). The influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on algal growth and quality in outdoor mass algal cultures. Biomass, 13(4), 219-233. doi:10.1016/0144-4565(87)90061-8
Paine, K. A. (2019). Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Portland Cements. In P. Hewlett, & M. Liska, Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete (5 ed., pp. 285-339). Oxford: Elsevier.
Pentecost, A., & Whitton, B. A. (2012). Subaerial Cyanobacteria. In B. A. Whitton, Ecology of Cyanobacteria II (pp. 291-316). Dordrecht: Springer.
Perini, K., & Rosasco, P. (2013). Cost-benefit analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Building and Environment, 70, 110-121.
Prieto, B., & Silva, B. (2005). Estimation of the potential bioreceptivity of granitic rocks from their intrinsic properties. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 56(4), 206-215.
Shi, C., Wu, Z., Xiao, J., Wang, D., Huang, Z., & Fang, Z. (2015). A review on ultra high performance concrete: Part I. Raw materials and mixture design. Construction and Building Materials, 101, 741-751.
Swinnen, I. A., Bernaerts, K., Dens, E. J., Geeraerd, A. H., & Van Impe, J. F. (2004). Predictive modelling of the microbial lag phase: A review. nternational Journal of Food Microbiology, 94(2), 137-159.
Tiano, P., Accolla, P., & Tomaselli, L. (1995). Phototrophic biodeteriogens on lithoid surfaces: An ecological study. Microbial Ecology, 29(3), 299-309.
Vázquez-Níon, D., Silva, B., & Prieto, B. (2018). Influence of the properties of granitic rocks on their bioreceptivity to subaerial phototrophic biofilms. Science of the Total Environment, 610-611, 44-54.
Veeger, M., Prieto, A., & Ottelé, M. (2021). Making bioreceptive concrete: formulation and testing of bioreceptive concrete mixtures. Manuscript under review.
Wang, D., Shi, C., Wu, Z., Xiao, J., Huang, Z., & Fang, Z. (2015). A review on ultra high performance concrete: Part II. Hydration, microstructure and properties. Construction and Building Materials, 96, 368-377.
Wiktor, V., De Leo, F. U., Guyonnet, R., Grosseau, P., & Garcia-Diaz, E. (2009). Accelerated laboratory test to study fungal biodeterioration of cementitious matrix. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 63(8), 1061-1065.
Wiktor, V., Grosseau, P., Guyonnet, R., & Garcia-Diaz, E. L. (2010). Accelerated weathering of cementitious matrix for the development of an accelerated laboratory test of biodeterioration. Materials and Structures, 44(3), 623-640.
Wolfaardt, M., Lawrence, J. R., & Korber, D. R. (1999). Function of EPS. In J. Wingender, T. R. Neu, & H. Flemming, Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Characterization, Structure and Function (pp. 171-200). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Zhang, T., & Klapper, I. (2010). Mathematical model of biofilm induced calcite precipitation. Water Science and Technology, 61(11), 2957-2964.
Copyright (c) 2021 Max Veeger, Alejandro Prieto, Marc Ottelé
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Author(s) hold their copyright without restrictions.