Is Demonstrating Understanding Rewarding? Student Academic Performance and Student Expression Mode in the Context of Micro Differentiation
AbstractHigh-performing students receive higher levels of micro differentiation (i.e., higher quality of tailored support) compared to low-performing students . The present study investigated an explanation for this practically relevant finding, hypothesizing that high-performing students utilize more demonstrations of understanding than claims of understanding compared to low-performing students. Thereby, they enable better teacher assessment of students’ needs, thus eliciting higher levels of micro differentiation. Research methods included coding scheme development and correlational analysis. Results revealed no evidence for the hypothesized relation between student academic performance and student expression mode. Findings of subsequently conducted exploratory analyses indicate important directions for future work.
Brekelmans, M. (submitted). Smart students receive
more adaptive support.
2. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H.,
Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover,
L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating
instruction in response to student readiness, interest,
and learning profile in academically diverse
classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the
Education of the Gifted, 27, 119-145.
3. Van de Pol, J., & Elbers, E. (2013). Scaffolding
student learning: A micro-analysis of teacher–student
interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction,
4. Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its
utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of
Learning Disabilities, 31, 344–364.
5. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over
800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New
York, NY: Routledge.
6. Nurmi, J. (2012). Students’ characteristics and
teacher–child relationships in instruction: A metaanalysis.
Educational Research Review, 7, 177-197.
7. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010).
Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of
research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-
8. Flem, A., Moen, T., & Gudmundsdottir, S. (2000).
Towards inclusive schools: a study of how a teacher
facilitated differentiated instruction. Paper presented
at the ECER Conference, Edinburgh.
9. Chi, M. T. H., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning from
examples via self-explanations. In L. B. Resnick
(Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in
honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 251-282). Hillsdale, NJ,
England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Koole, T. (2010). Displays of Epistemic Access:
Student Responses to Teacher Explanations. Research
on Language & Social Interaction, 43, 183-209.
11. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J.
(2014).Teacher scaffolding in small-group work: An
intervention study. Journal of the Learning Sciences,
12. Van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B., van Gog, T., &
Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). The effect of delayed-
JOLs and sentence generation on children’s
monitoring accuracy and regulation of idiom study.
Metacognition and learning, 8, 173-191.
13. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three
approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative
Health Research, 15, 1277-1288.
14. Wells, G. (2010). Coding scheme for the analysis of
classroom discourse. Retrieved from http://people.
15. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The
measurement of observer agreement for categorical
data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
16. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM
SPSS Statistics. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
17. Wittwer, J., Nückles, M., Landmann, N., & Renkl, A.
(2010). Can tutors be supported in giving effective
explanations? Journal of Educational Psychology,
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) license and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page.