Werelderfgoed en dan? Een perspectief vanuit de alledaagse praktijk van Willemstad en Paramaribo

  • Astrid Aarsen

Samenvatting

A city is not built with the intention of becoming world heritage. This value is attributed to it on the basis of what it has produced in a spatial-physical sense in the course of time, as a reflection of its view of life and way of life, its administrative ambitions and social-economic needs. While the municipality of Amsterdam is awaiting a definite answer about placement of the seventeenth-century ring of canals on the World Heritage List, there are two cities across the Atlantic Ocean that preceded it in this respect and may serve as valuable examples for the actual execution. These are the historical city centres of Willemstad and Paramaribo, which were proclaimed world heritage in 1997 and 2002 respectively. Both in Willemstad and in Paramaribo it concerns an urban development process directed by the Netherlands for centuries on end; a colonial past that increases the complexities and stratification of the world heritage list. Preservation of heritage from the past may give shape to the local, contemporary urban culture, but has hardly played any part in it so far.

The fact that they were placed on the World Heritage List appears to have been a last resort for both Willemstad and Paramaribo in order to be able to safeguard the special cultural values of their highly neglected historical city centres. Thus this situation reverts directly to the original goal of the World Heritage Convention of 1972, namely by means of international aid rescuing valuable cultural and natural heritage that is in danger of being lost.

Although, notably these past years, both historical city centres are getting more international attention, it was not possible to prevent further decay and destruction of these historical city centres, even after having been placed on the World Heritage List.

In the daily practice of both cities assuming responsibility for their world heritage proves difficult to put into operation. The current developments and struggles in Willemstad and Paramaribo show that the significance of world heritage for the local, daily practice has been small so far. This significance is mainly expressed in the increased possibilities of exploiting the local historical heritage as a tourist attraction. This may have to do with the fact that in both cities the (universal) cultural values of the historical city centres attributed from a historical point of view have not been translated into operational values for the local practice yet and are therefore intangible for owners, investors and designers.

Dilemmas in management arise when only limited financial resources are available, maintenance and restoration programmes and incentive schemes are lacking, the structure of the executing organization is faltering, understaffed or not firmly rooted administratively, the local reality is guided by ad hoc initiatives and informal building practices, and when execution of and compliance with existing laws and regulations are seriously inadequate. A management plan by itself cannot change this.

Discussions on when heritage is of universal value for mankind, on the qualitative diversity in composition of the World Heritage List and on when heritage is in danger or should be placed on the World Heritage in Danger List, are politically and scientifically interesting on a higher abstraction level and have frequently been held, but eventually they have not contributed in any essential way to the survival of heritage (in danger), which is the primary goal of the World Heritage Convention. After all, the survival of urban heritage is not determined internationally, but is eventually fought out and realized by all the parties involved in the daily, local practice, which cannot be included in a management plan. In practice a supplementary, process-based commitment to world heritage is of overriding importance.

By paying attention to the special qualities of one’s own cultural history and its material and immaterial references, by making its values operational in planning processes and by positioning the historical city centre as an essential element of contemporary culture, world heritage will acquire new significance.

The highly politicized and not easily accessible – because very much specialist- oriented – organization that the UNESCO is at the moment, ought to become less bureaucratic and might start to function more as a platform and interactive network for exchange of knowledge and development of knowledge on preservation and management methods for heritage.

Referenties

1 M. Kuipers, ‘Fragile structures: The City as Cultural Heritage’, in: L. Deben, W. Salet en M.T. van Thoor (eds), Cultural Heritage and the Future of the Historic Inner City of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 2004, 84-100.

2 B.J.M. van der Aa, Preserving the heritage of humanity. Obtaining world heritage status and the impact of listing, Groningen 2005 en B.J.M. van der Aa en G.J. Ashworth, ‘Dertig jaar werelderfgoedconventie: Een loze lijst?’, Geografie 11(2002) 10, 6-9.

3 De observaties ten behoeve van dit artikel zijn gebaseerd op de betrokkenheid van de auteur bij projecten van de TU Delft in Willemstad en Paramaribo, in de periode 2007-2009.

4 B.R. Buddingh, Van Punt en Snoa. Ontstaan en groei van Willemstad, Curaçao 1994, 110 en C.L. Temminck Groll, The Dutch Overseas, Architectural Survey. Mutual heritage of four centuries in three continents, Zwolle 2002, 310-329.

5 Ibidem.

6 Buddingh 1994, 104-105.

7 P.C. Henriquez, ‘What future for Curacao’s architectural monuments?’, in: H.E. Coomans, M.A. Newton en M. Coomans-Eustatia (eds), Building up the future from the past: studies on the architecture and historic monuments in the Dutch Caribbean, Zutphen 1990, 165-171.

8 Zie ook: M.A. Newton, ‘Monumentenbeleid en stadsvernieuwing op Curaçao’, Bulletin KNOB 92(1993) 1, 14-19.

9 A. Aarsen en P. Meurs, De ontwikkelingspotenties van stedelijk werelderfgoed. Een voorbeeldproject in Scharloo Abou, Willemstad, in opdracht van het Ministerie van OCW, Directie Cultureel Erfgoed, Delft / Willemstad 2009; zie ook: ®MIT TU Delft / Dienst Ruimtelijke Ontwikkeling en Volkshuisvesting Curaçao, Project inhoudelijke verdieping masterplan Scharloo Abou. Ontwikkeling van het Werelderfgoed Willemstad, eindverslag fase I, Willemstad / Delft 2008.

10 Geciteerd uit het nominatiedossier voor Willemstad: Nomination of the ‘Historic area of Willemstad, inner city and harbour for the World Heritage List, Willemstad / Den Haag 1996.

11 Temminck Groll 2002, 365.

12 Zie de toelichting Lijst van het Werelderfgoed: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list

13 International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

14 Zie de tekst in het nominatiedossier voor Willemstad: Nomination of the ‘Historic area of Willemstad, inner city and harbour’ for the World Heritage List, Willemstad / Den Haag 1996 en Newton 1993.

15 Zie: http://sges.heritagesuriname.org.

16 Ministerie van Openbare Werken, Bijzonder te stellen eisen ten behoeve van bouwplannen in de historische binnenstad van Paramaribo en aangrenzende bufferzones, zoals aangewezen bij staatsbesluit van 31 oktober 2001, Paramaribo 2003.

17 PHI Architecture, Urban Development Plan Paramaribo, oktober 2005; zie ook: B. Adams en S. Kooyman, Ontwikkelingsstrategie voor de rivieroever van Paramaribo, masterproef Academiejaar 2006-2007, Hogeschool Antwerpen / Hoger Instituut voor Architectuurwetenschappen Henry van de Velde/ Departement Ontwerpwetenschappen, Antwerpen 2007.

18 G.J. Ashworth, ‘From history to heritage, from heritage to identity: in search of concepts and models’, in: G.J. Ashworth en P.J. Larkham (eds), Building a new heritage: tourism, culture and identity in the New Europe, London 1994, 13-30.

19 C. Iamandi, Paramaribo World Heritage Site. Management Plan Outline, Delft / Parijs 2008.

20 Zie resultaten en aanbevelingen in: Aarsen en Meurs 2009.

21 Iamandi 2008.

22 M.D. Ozinga, De monumenten van Curaçao in woord en beeld, Den Haag / Willemstad 1959, 195.

23 C.L. Temminck Groll e.a., De architektuur van Suriname, 1667- 1930, Zutphen 1973.

24 Iamandi 2008.

25 M. Martin, ‘De schizofrene stad’, in: M. Dings (red.), De stad, Rotterdam 2006, 331-347.

26 J.M. De Figueiredo, in: World Heritage Paper 9, 46.

27 Ontleend aan: Martin 2006, 345-346, noot 23.

28 Geciteerd in: Kuipers 2004, 96.

Biografie auteur

Astrid Aarsen

Drs. Astrid Aarsen is architectuurhistoricus. Van april 2007 tot juli 2009 was zij als universitair docent verbonden aan de leerstoel van prof. dr. ir. Paul Meurs, bij afdeling ®MIT van de TU Delft. In deze periode heeft zij zich vooral bezig gehouden met experimenteel onderwijs, waarin de combinatie onderzoek en onderwijs als inzet is gebruikt voor werelderfgoedprojecten in Paramaribo en Willemstad. Sinds kort is zij werkzaam op Curaçao waar zij haar eigen advies- en onderzoekspraktijk heeft opgezet onder de naam SINEMBARGO N.V..

Hoe te citeren
AARSEN, Astrid. Werelderfgoed en dan? Een perspectief vanuit de alledaagse praktijk van Willemstad en Paramaribo. Bulletin KNOB, [S.l.], p. 103-114, juni 2009. ISSN 2589-3343. Beschikbaar op: <https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/knob/article/view/Aarsen103>. Datum gebruik: 19 juli 2018 doi: https://doi.org/10.7480/knob.108.2009.3.158.
Gepubliceerd
2009-06-01