Reflections on Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Architecture

Authors

  • David Macarthur Philosophy Department,The University of SydneyNSW 2006AUSTRALIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.11.1.1796

Abstract

Two recent collections on architectural theory and practice invoke the name of pragmatism as marking the hope of a new more intimate alignment of theory and practice after a period of what I call ‘philosophical vampirism’.  This paper examines what role the philosophical tradition of pragmatism might play in relation to architecture. I argue that pragmatism is best understood as a method of overcoming intellectualist and metaphysical obstacles to clear thinking as opposed to a philosophical ideology of some kind. Against Rem Koolhaas’s argument for post-criticality I show that we are always already critical. Pragmatism’s task is to make criticism better. I end by invoking the craft ethos as articulated by Richard Sennett in his book The Craftsman (2008), as perhaps the best model of what a pragmatist architecture might look like.

Author Biography

David Macarthur, Philosophy Department,The University of SydneyNSW 2006AUSTRALIA

David Macarthur is an Associate Professor in the Philosophy Department at the University of Sydney. He works at the interface of contemporary pragmatism, Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language and psychology and the philosophy of art. In addition to these topics, he has published articles in leading philosophy journals and books on liberal naturalism, metaphysical quietism, skepticism, common sense, perception, ordinary language, philosophy of architecture, and philosophy of photography and film. He has co-edited three collections of papers with Mario De Caro (Roma Tré): Naturalism in Question (Harvard, 2004); Naturalism and Normativity (Columbia, 2010); and Philosophy in an Age of Science: Physics, Mathematics and Skepticism (Harvard, 2012); and is currently editing Hilary & Ruth-Anna Putnam, Pragmatism as a Way of Life: The Lasting Legacy of William James and John Dewey (Harvard, 2017).

References

Allen, Stan, “Stocktaking 2004: Questions about the Present and Future of Design” in The New Architectural Pragmatism, Saunders (ed.), 101–106.

Barthes, Roland, “The Death of the Author” in Image, Music, Text. Trans. Stephen Heath (London: Fontana, 1977).

Blake, Casey, “Afterword: What’s Pragmatism Got To Do With It?” in The Pragmatist Imagination, Joan Ockman (ed.), 266–7.

David Bromwich, Romantic Critical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).

Dewey, John, Experience and Nature [1925], Later Works: vol. 1, Jo Ann Boydston & Larry Hickman (eds.) (Charlottesville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985).

Dewey, John, Reconstruction in Philosophy (New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1920).

Harries, Karsten, The Ethical Function of Architecture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997).

Hays, Michael K., “Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form,” Perspecta vol. 21 (1984): 14–19.

James, William, “Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking” [1907] (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1975).

Kolb, David, “Has Architecture Lost its Bearings?”. The text is available on-line: http://www.dkolb.org

Rem Koolhaas, “‘Life in the Metropolis’ or ‘Culture of Congestion'” Architectural Design vol. 47, no. 5 (August 1977).

_______Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for New York (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).

_______S,M,L,XL (New York: Monacelli Press, 1995).

Lahiji, Nadir, The Missed Encounter of Radical Philosophy with Architecture (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).

Loos, Adolf, “Architecture” [1910] in Adolf Loos: On Architecture, Daniel & Adolf Opel (eds.) (Riverside: Ariadne Press, 2007), 73–85.

Lehman, Maria Lorena Lehman, Sensing Architecture, 2012, Found on-line at: http://sensingarchitecture.com

Macarthur, David, “A Kant-Inspired Vision of Pragmatism as Democratic Experimentalism,” in Gabriele Gava & Robert Stern (eds.), Pragmatism, Kant & Transcendental Philosophy (London: Routledge, 2015) 67–84.

_______“Science and the Value of Objectivity” in Giancarlo & Sarin Marchetti (eds.), Facts and Values: The Ethics and Metaphysics of Normativity (London: Routledge, 2016).

________“Metaphysical Quietism and Everyday Life,” in G. D’Oro & S. Overgaard (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 270–296.

Murdoch, Iris, The Sovereignty of Good (London: Routledge, 1970).

Ockman, Joan, “Pragmatism/Architecture: The Idea of the Workshop Project” in The Pragmatist Imagination, Joan Ockman (ed.), 16–23.

_______(ed.) The Pragmatist Imagination (Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press, 2000).

________“One for the Sandpile,” Journal of Architectural Education, vol. 62 no. 3, (2009): 26–27, 99.

Peirce, Charles, “The Fixation of Belief,“ in Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (ed.) (New York: Dover, 1965).

Rorty, Richard, Consequences of Pragmatism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).

Saunders, William S., “Introduction: Accept, Resist, or Infect? Architecture and Contemporary Capitalism” in The New Architectural Pragmatism, vii–xvii.

_______(ed.) The New Architectural Pragmatism (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2007).

Sennett, Richard, The Craftsman (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008)

Somol, Robert & Sarah Whiting, “Notes around the Doppler Effect and Other Moods of Modernism,” Perspecta, vol. 33, Mining Autonomy (2002), 72-77.

Weber, Max, “Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy” [1904] in The Methodology of the Social Sciences, E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch (ed. & trans.), (New York: Free Press, 1949).

West, Cornell, “Race and Architecture,” in The Cornell West Reader (New York: Basic Civitas Books, 1999).

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations. 2nd ed. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1958).

_______Culture and Value, Revised 2nd ed. Trans. Peter Winch (Oxford:Blackwell, 1998).

Downloads

Published

2017-07-19